벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제16권3호
  • /
  • Pages.145-158
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

비상장기업의 소유구조가 IPO 성공에 미치는 영향

The Effect of Ownership Structure on IPO Success: Empirical Evidence from Non-listed Firm

  • 김소원 ((주)미라파트너스 투자팀) ;
  • 조신 (연세대학교 정보대학원) ;
  • 조지형 (연세대학교 정보대학원)
  • Kim, Sowon (Investment Team, Mira Partners) ;
  • Cho, Shin (Graduate School of Information, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jo, Jeehyung (Graduate School of Information, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2021.05.10
  • 심사 : 2021.06.23
  • 발행 : 2021.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 비상장기업의 소유구조가 코스닥 상장에 미치는 영향을 살펴보는 것이다. 소유구조를 중심으로 상장 성공의 특성을 분석한 선행연구가 거의 없어 상장을 목표로 스타트업을 성장시키는 경영진들이 창업 초기부터 상장의 가능성을 높일 수 있는 소유구조를 갖추어 가는데 참고할 만한 자료가 부족한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 코스닥 시장에 상장 예비 심사 청구 기업 중 상장(IPO) 성공기업과 실패기업 대상비교를 통해, 선행연구에서 충분히 고려하지 않았던 기업의 소유구조가 상장 성공에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 주요 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. (1)벤처캐피탈의 투자 및 지분율은 코스닥 상장 성공에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤다. 이는 벤처캐피탈의 투자가 정보 비대칭 문제를 완화하며, 벤처캐피탈의 투자는 시장참여자에게 유의한 신호가 된다는 것을 뜻한다. 이러한 결과는 벤처캐피탈이 코스닥 시장에 상장하려는 기업에게 중요한 역할을 한다는 것을 보여준다. (2)최대주주 지분율과 기업의 상장 성공 간에는 약한 역U자 관계가 존재하는 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 최대주주 지분율이 증가함에 따라 도덕적 해이가 완화되어 상장 성공 가능성이 높아진다. 그러나 최대주주지분율이 일정 수준보다 높아지면, 최대주주의 사익추구에 대한 우려로 상장 성공 가능성이 낮아진다. 이러한 비선형 관계는 기존 실증연구와 일치하는 결과로, 최대주주의 주식 소유가 대리인 비용을 줄이는데 기여한다는 것을 의미한다. 이 연구는 신호이론과 대리인 이론을 활용하여 기업의 소유구조가 상장 성공에 미치는 영향을 분석함으로써 학문적으로 기여하였다. 본 연구 결과는 기업공개를 준비하는 기업에 실무적 시사점을 제공하고 있다.

The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of the ownership structure of unlisted firms on KOSDAQ listing. There are few studies analyzing the characteristics of listing success based on ownership structure. For startup executives, there is not enough data to refer to the ownership structure that can increase the possibility of listing. This paper examines the effects of ownership structure on IPO success through comparison between listed successful and failed companies among the companies in application for KOSDAQ listing eligibility review. The major findings are as follows; (1) Venture capital investment and shareholding have a statistically positive effect on the success of KOSDAQ listing. This results indicate that the venture capital's investment alleviate the problem of information asymmetry, and it is a valid signal for market participants. The result means the role of venture capital seems to be important when companies are listed on the KOSDAQ. (2) The largest shareholder's stake has an inverted-U shape relationship with listing success. In other words, the ownership concentration mitigates moral hazard problem, which leads to listing success. However, if the ownership concentration exceeds a certain level, the chances of success in listing will decrease due to concerns over the pursuit of private interests. The result suggests that the largest shareholder's stake reduce agency problem. This study academically contributes to the existing literature by demonstrating the ownership structure affects IPOs, and explaining the results based on agent theory and signal theory. Our results provide practical implications for companies preparing for an IPO on the KOSDAQ.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aharony, J., Lin, C., & Loeb, M.(1993). Initial Public Offerings, Accounting Choices, and Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 10(1), 61-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1993.tb00382.x
  2. Baron, D. P.(1982). A model of demand for investment banking advising and distribution services for new issues. Journal of Finance, 37(4), 959-976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1982.tb03591.x
  3. Berle, A., & Means, G.(1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New Work: MacMillan.
  4. Bhatt, G. D.(2000). Organizing knowledge in the knowledge development cycle. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270010315371
  5. Block, J.(2012). R&D Investments in Family and Founder Firms: An Agency Perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 248-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.09.003
  6. Brau, J. C., & Fawcett, S. E.(2006). Initial public offerings: an analysis of theory and practice. Journal of Finance, 61(1), 399-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00840.x
  7. Cho, S., & Jung, W. J.(2017). The Effects of Corporate Ownership Structure on R&D Expenditures: Comparison between KSE and KOSDAQ Listed Firms. Korea Technology Innovation Society, 20(1), 239-270.
  8. Cho, S., Jo, J. H., & Jung, W. J.(2018). The Effects of Corporate Ownership Structure on R&D Expenditures: Comparison between KSE and KOSDAQ Listed Firms. Korean Corporation Management Review, 25(1), 53-79. https://doi.org/10.21052/kcmr.2018.25.1.03
  9. Choi, S. H., & Choi, J. H.(2018). Determinants of Initial Public Offering Firms:Focused on the Firms Applying for Listing Eligibility Review. Korean Accounting Journal, 27(6), 61-94. https://doi.org/10.24056/KAJ.2018.10.003
  10. Choi, S. H., & Choi, K.(2014). The Effect of Backdoor Listing Requirements and Procedures on Earnings Quality. Korean management review, 43(6), 1845-1874.
  11. Coles, J., Lemmon, M., & Meschke, J.(2012). Structural Models and Endogeneity in Corporate Finance: The Link between Managerial Ownership and Corporate Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 103(1), 149-168 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.04.002
  12. Davila, A., Foster, G., & Gupta, M.(2003). Venture capital financing and the growth of startup firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(6), 689-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00127-1
  13. Demsetz, H.(1983). The Structure of Ownership and The Theory of The Firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 375-390 https://doi.org/10.1086/467041
  14. Fischer, C.(2000). Why do companies go public? Empirical Evidence from Germany's Neuer market. SSRN Working Paper, 1-43. Retrieved(2021.05.28.) from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.229529.
  15. Gompers, P. & Lerner, J.(1999). An analysis of compensation in the U.S. venture capital partnership. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(1), 3-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00042-7
  16. Grant, R. M.(1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
  17. Gulati, R., & Higgins, M. C.(2003). Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 127-144. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.287
  18. Holmstrom, B.(1979). Moral Hazard and Observability. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 74-91. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003320
  19. Jensen, M., & Meckling, W.(1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  20. Kim, A. R., & Choi, M. H.(2011). CEO Turnover in Owner-managed firms: The Choice Between Owner-manager and Professional CEO. Korean Society of Strategic Management, 14(2), 57-75.
  21. Kim, B. G., & Kim, D. W.(2007). The Relation of Corporate Governance and Corporate Value: Korean Evidence from Panel Data. The Korean Journal of Financial Engineering, 6(2), 223-247. https://doi.org/10.35527/kfedoi.2007.6.2.011
  22. Kim, H. S., & Joh, K. S.(2001). An Empirical Study on Determinants of Going Public. Journal of Buisiness Research, 16(3), 173-195.
  23. Kim, I. H.(2008). Ways to Go Public: Choice of IPO, Sellout, and Reverse Takeover. The Korean Finance Association Conference, 2008 Joint Academic Research Symposium, Asan: The Korean Finance Association.
  24. Kim, I. S., Lee, H. I., & Choi, S. H.(2014). Earnings Management of Initial Public Offerings: Evidence from Venture Capital-Backed Firms. Korean Accounting Review, 39(3), 179-213.
  25. Kim, J. I., & Kim. E. H.(2006). An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Initial Public Offerings: in the KOSDAQ mark. Korean Accounting Journal, 15, 123-158.
  26. Kim, J. I., & Kwon, S. Y.(2007). The Ex Post-Empirical Study on the Determinants of Initial Public Offerings: in the KOSDAQ market. Korean Accounting Review, 32(3), 89-121
  27. Kim, J. K., & Ahn, D. H.(2017). Effects of the fitness among Entrepreneurship, Dynamic capabilities and Innovation activities on Business performance. Journal of digital convergence, 15(1), 163-170. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.1.163
  28. Kim, M. T., & Lee, S. H.(2016). A Study of Determinants of Initial Public Offerings(IPOs) in the KONEX market. Korea International Accounting Association, 66, 335-354.
  29. Kim, Y. G., & Kim, S. H.(2011). The Impact of SMEs' Ownership on Business Performance Before and After IPO. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 24(2), 911-926.
  30. Korean Venture Capital Association.(2020), Venture Capital Market Brief, Retrieved(2021.05.08.) from http://www.kvca.or.kr/Program/board/listbody.html?a_gb=board&a_cd=15&a_item=0&sm=4_1&page=1&po_no=5449.
  31. Lee, G. S.(2021.05.06.). [Market recover without M&A] VC, Fund collection through M&A is the lowest in five years, Edaily, Retrieved from https://www.edaily.co.kr/news/read?newsId=01216886625637392&mediaCodeNo=E.
  32. Lee, K. Y., Shin, H. H., & Kim, S. Y.(2019). An Empirical Analysis of Corporate Performance According to Existence and Types of Venture Capital. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.14.2.201904.15
  33. Lee, S. W., Kim, J. S., & Ryu, D. J.(2010). Venture Capitalist Certification in Initial Public Offerings: the Case of KOSDAQ Market. Korean Corporation Management Review, 17(2), 1-22.
  34. Lim, E. C., & Kim, D. H.(2017). A Study of Grandstanding According to the Types of Venture Capital in Korea. Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, 22(6), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.9723/JKSIIS.2017.22.6.085
  35. Lim, S. J., & Sung, S. Y.(2005). The Effect of Pre-IPO Ownership Structure on IPO Success. Journal of Strategic Management, 8(2), 55-79.
  36. Long, H. & Zhang, Z.(2014). Examining IPO Success in the Emerging Growth Enterprise Market of China. Global Economy and Finance Journal, 7(2), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.21102/gefj.2014.09.72.05
  37. Megginson, W. L., & Weiss, K. A.(1991). Venture capitalist certification in initial public offerings. Journal of Finance, 46(3), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03770.x
  38. Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, H., & Cannella, A. (2007). Are Family Firms Really Superior Performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5), 829-858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.03.004
  39. Ministry of SMEs and Startups.(2018). Trends in venture investment in the first half of 2018, Retrieved(2021.05.08.) from https://index.go.kr/potal/stts/idxMain/selectPoSttsIdxMainPrint.do?idx_cd=1196&board_cd=INDX_001
  40. Na, J. H., Park, S. K., & Kim, C. S.(2007). A Study on Success Factors of Initial Public Offerings for Venture Corporation Using Non-Financial Factors. The Korean Small Business Review, 29(2), 1-22.
  41. Oh, S. K., & Han, H. H.(2014). The Short- and Long-Term Performance of Venture-Backed IPO Kosdaq Firms and the Roles of Venture Capitals in Korea. Asian Review of Financial Research, 27(3), 457-391.
  42. Park, B. J.(2015). The Effect of the Largest Shareholder's Share Ratio of Venture Firms and Audit Report Lag on Audit Fees. Review of Accounting and Policy Studies, 20(1), 145-173.
  43. Park, D. I., Yang, Y. S., & Kim. M. S.(2021). A Study on Investors Determinants Addressed by Startup Entrepreneurs: In the Center of Startups in Water Industry. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 16(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.16.1.202102.1
  44. Park, G. H., & Kim, D. H.(2021). The Influence of the Founder's Social Competence and Social Capital on Access to Funding Sources. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 16(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.16.1.202102.21
  45. Poulsen, A. B., & M. Stegemoller.(2008). Moving from private to public ownership: Selling out to public firms versus initial public offerings. Financial Management, 37(1), 81-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2008.00005.x
  46. Rao, H.(1994). The social construction of retputation: certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile inudstry 1895-1912. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150904
  47. Rock, K.(1986). Why New Issues Are Underpriced. Journal of Financial Economics, 15, 187-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(86)90054-1
  48. Stuart, T. E, Hong, H., & Hybels, R. C.(1999). Interorganizational endoresements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 315-349. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666998
  49. Stulz, R.(1988). Managerial Control of Voting Rights: Financing Policies and the Market for Corporate Control. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 25-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90039-6
  50. Yoon, B. S., Kim, K. S., & Kim. H. O.(2011). The Impact of Venture Capitalists Ownership on the Underpricing of KOSDAQ IPOs. Korean International Accounting Review, 39, 257-282. https://doi.org/10.21073/kiar.2011..39.012