정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제25권2호
  • /
  • Pages.355-365
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

스마트기기와 앱을 활용한 온라인 수업 시연 교육이 초등예비교사들의 실제 수업 활용 의도에 미치는 영향

The Effect of Online Class Demonstration Education Using Smart Devices and Apps on the Actual Class Use Intention of Elementary School Pre-Teachers

  • Suh, Woong (Dept. of Computer Education, SungKyunKwan University) ;
  • Ahn, Seongjin (Dept. of Computer Education, SungKyunKwan University)
  • 투고 : 2021.01.25
  • 심사 : 2021.03.08
  • 발행 : 2021.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

2020년 이후 학교에서는 온라인에서 수업하는 것이 일상이 되었으며 동시에 교사들에게는 스마트기기와 앱을 활용하여 수업을 설계하고 진행하는 역량이 중요해지고 있다. 이에 이 연구에서는 온라인으로 스마트기기와 앱을 활용하여 수업을 시연하는 것이 향후 실제 현장에서 그것을 활용하여 수업하고자 하는 예비교사의 의도에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지를 확인하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 예비교사의 스마트교육 역량 향상을 위한 설계 원칙에 따라 수업을 설계하고 예비교사를 대상으로 그 수업을 진행하였다. 이후 UTAUT모델에서 비롯한 변인인 성과기대, 노력기대, 사회적영향, 자발성, 활용의도, 촉진조건을 수업 전·후에 각각 측정하고 대응 표본 t검정을 통해 수업의 효과성을 검증하였다. 그 결과 촉진조건을 제외한 모든 변인에서 유의한 정(+)의 영향을 주는 것으로 확인되었다. 이러한 결과는 온라인 수업 시연 교육이 예비교원으로 하여금 스마트 교육이 필수가 되어버린 교육현장에 보다 실제적으로 적응할 수 있게 하는 한 가지 방안이 될 수 있음을 시사한다.

Online teaching has become a daily routine in schools after 2020, and at the same time, the ability to design and conduct classes using smart devices and apps is becoming more important to teachers. Therefore, in this study, we tried to find out how the demonstration of classes using smart devices and apps online has an effect on the intentions of prospective teachers who want to use them in the future. To this end, classes were designed according to the design principles for improving smart education capabilities of pre-service teachers, and the classes were conducted for pre-service teachers. Afterwards, the variables included in the UTAUT model, such as Performance Expectancy, effort Expectancy, social influence, Voluntariness of Use, Behavioral Intention, and Facilitating Conditions, were measured before and after classes, respectively, and the effectiveness of the class was verified through t-test of response samples. As a result, it was confirmed that all variables except the Facilitating Conditions had a significant positive(+) effect. These results suggest that online class demonstration education can be a way for pre-service teachers to more practically adapt to the educational field where smart education is required.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guardia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923-945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
  2. Janet Scull, Michael Phillips, Umesh Sharma & Kathryn Garnier (2020). Innovations in teacher education at the time of COVID19: an Australian perspective, Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 497-506. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1802701
  3. Maria Assuncao Flores & Marilia Gago (2020). Teacher education in times of COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal: national, institutional and pedagogical responses, Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1799709
  4. Kearney, M., & Maher, D. (2013). Mobile learning in maths teacher education: Using iPads to support pre-service teachers' professional development. Australian Educational Computing, 27(3), 76-84.
  5. Oigara, J. N., & Keengwe, J. (2011). Pre-service teachers and technology integration with SMART boards. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 7(4), 84-92. https://doi.org/10.4018/jicte.2011100108
  6. Lee, Y., & Lee, J. (2014). Enhancing pre-service teachers' self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration through lesson planning practice. Computers & Education, 73, 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.001
  7. Lim, C. I., Han, H. J., Hong, Y. I., Lee, S. Y., & Lee, E. Y. (2016). A model of educational program for improving competency of pre-service teacher to implement and integrate smart education in classroom. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 2 (2), p351-380.
  8. Kim, M. J. (2010). Design-Based Research on the Development of e-Portfolio System for Pre-Service Teachers. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 16(4), 525-552.
  9. Kim, H., & Lim, C. (2013). Smart learning curriculum for enhancing pre-service teachers' practicum experience: A case study of "SMART Teacher Lab". The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 30(3), 197-220. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2013.30.3.197
  10. Chung, M. J., & Chung, J. Y. (2012). An analysis of the teaching practice effects on the competencies of pre-service teacher. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 29(4), 63-83. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2012.29.4.63
  11. Chung, H. Y. (2004). Student teachers' expectations toward, evaluation of and their changes of perceptions through student teaching experience. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 21(2), 209-230.
  12. Kim, H. J. (2020). A Study on the Analysis of Online Class Experiences of Elementary School Teachers Followed by COVID-19. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20, 613-639.
  13. Leem, J., & Sung, E. (2015). Smart Education Leading Teachers' Perception on Characteristics of Smart Devices and Educational Possibility of Smart Education. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 21(1), 137-163. https://doi.org/10.15833/KAFEIAM.21.1.137
  14. Bae J. H., & Lim K. Y. (2013). The Effects of Contiguity Principle on Learning Achievement and Cognitive Load in Learning with Smartpads. Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 491-516. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.29.3.491
  15. Leem, J., & Sung, E. (2015). Smart Education Leading Teachers' Perception on Characteristics of Smart Devices and Educational Possibility of Smart Education. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 21(1), 137-163. https://doi.org/10.15833/KAFEIAM.21.1.137
  16. Go, J. L. (2020). An Analysis for Mediating and Control Effect of Academic Self-Efficacy in Relation of Primary School Student's Smart Media Literacy and School Life Adaptation. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20, 559-579.
  17. Gim, Y., Chung, M., & Kim, J. (2013). A study on the actual condition and utilization plan of smart devices for educational purpose. Journal of Internet Computing and Services, 14(3), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.7472/jksii.2013.14.3.47
  18. Garrison, D. R. (2016). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice. Taylor & Francis.
  19. Kang M. A., & Nam S. U. (2020). An exploratory study On-line class, a future education method: Based on FGI study on elementary school teachers in Seong-si. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 20(21), 89-116. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.21.89
  20. Ferdig, R.E., Baumgartner, E., Hartshorne, R., Kaplan-Rakowski, R. & Mouza, C. (2020). Teaching, Technology, and Teacher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Stories from the Field. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 7, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/216903/.
  21. Benjamin L. M. (2020) Adaptations to a face-to-face initial teacher education course 'forced' online due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 609-611. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1755205
  22. Kim, S. Y. (2012). An Analysis about of Path Coefficient Difference of Intention to Use between Smart Education Experience Group and Non-Experience Group. Journal of the korean association of information education, 16(4), 383-395.
  23. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
  24. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  25. Venkatesh, V., Sykes, T. A., & Zhang, X. (2011). 'Just what the doctor ordered': a revised UTAUT for EMR system adoption and use by doctors. In 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1-10.
  26. Jeong, H. H. (2012). Exploring Factors Influencing Teachers' Behavior Intention of Multimedia teaching material in Classroom-Based on Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Curriculum Evaluation, 15(1), 157-186. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2012.15.1.157
  27. Gim, Y., & Kim, J. (2014). A Study of the Elementary School Teacher's Intention using Smart Devices in Class. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 17(5), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.32431/KACE.2014.17.5.004
  28. Kim, H. J., & Chung, J. S. (2017). Structural relationships and moderator effects among factors affecting technology use among teachers. Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 35-73. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.33.1.035
  29. Lee G. J., Park C. S., An Y. J., & Han K. S. (2020). A Study on the Factors Affecting the Continuing Intention of Untact Lecture in the Perspective of Prof. Jounal of The Korea Society of Information Technology Policy & Management, 12(5), 2025-2031.
  30. Kim K. H., & Zhu, Qing. (2018). Development of a Conceptual Model for Instructional Design of Online Case Based Learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 16(3), 133-155.
  31. Joo, Y., Chung, A., Choi, M., & Yi, S. (2015). A study of factors influencing intention to use technology in teaching activities. Journal of the Institute of Electronics and Information Engineers, 52(3), 221-229. https://doi.org/10.5573/IEIE.2015.52.3.221
  32. Kang, H. Y., & Kim, S. W. (2013). The Relationships among Factors that Effects on Acceptance Intention in Smart Education. Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, 18(7), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2013.18.7.183
  33. Lee D. Y. (2020). A Study on the Improvement of the Teaching Profession Course in College of Education Using A Grounded Theory. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 37(2), 79-105. https://doi.org/10.24211/TJKTE.2020.37.2.79
  34. Im Y. K. (2013). In Search of the Reflection and Orientation of the Practicum in Korea Teacher Education Program. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 30(4), 189-213. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2013.30.4.189