Journal of Trauma and Injury

The Korean Society of Traumatology (대한외상학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Indications for Laparotomy in Patients with Abdominal Penetrating Injuries Presenting with Ambiguous Computed Tomography Findings

  • Choi, Eun Ji (Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Sanghee (Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Byung Hee (Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2020.10.12
  • Accepted : 2020.12.08
  • Published : 2021.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Negative laparotomy in patients with abdominal penetrating injuries (APIs) is associated with deleterious outcomes and unnecessary expense; however, the indications for laparotomy in hemodynamically stable patients with ambiguous computed tomography (CT) findings remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with negative laparotomy. findings Methods: Data of patients who underwent laparotomy for APIs between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who presented with definite indications for laparotomy were excluded. The patients were dichotomized into negative and positive laparotomy groups, and the baseline characteristics, laboratory test results, and CT findings were compared between the groups. Results: Of 55 patients with ambiguous CT findings, 38 and 17 patients were assigned to the negative and positive laparotomy groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to the baseline characteristics or the nature of the ambiguous CT findings. However, the laboratory test results showed that there was a difference in the percentage of neutrophils between the groups (negative: 55.6% [range 47.4-66.1%] vs. positive: 79.8% [range 77.6-88.2%], p<0.001), although the total white blood cell count was not significantly different. The mean duration of hospital stay for the negative laparotomy group was 13.1 days, and seven patients (18.4%) experienced complications. Conclusions: Diagnostic factors definitively indicative of laparotomy were not identified, although the percentage of neutrophils might be helpful. However, routine laparotomy in patients with peritoneal injuries could result in instances of negative laparotomy.

Keywords

References

  1. Byun CS, Park IH, Oh JH, Bae KS, Lee KH, Lee E. Epidemiology of trauma patients and analysis of 268 mortality cases: trends of a single center in Korea. Yonsei Med J 2015;56:220-6. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.1.220
  2. Woo S, Lee SW, Lee K, Seo WS, Lee J, Kim HC, et al. Characteristics of high-intent suicide attempters admitted to emergency departments. J Korean Med Sci 2018;33:e259. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e259
  3. Biffl WL, Leppaniemi A. Management guidelines for penetrating abdominal trauma. World J Surg 2015;39:1373-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2793-7
  4. Como JJ, Bokhari F, Chiu WC, Duane TM, Holevar MR, Tandoh MA, et al. Practice management guidelines for selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal trauma. J Trauma 2010;68:721-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181cf7d07
  5. Dienstknecht T, Horst K, Sellei RM, Berner A, Nerlich M, Hardcastle TC. Indications for bullet removal: overview of the literature, and clinical practice guidelines for European trauma surgeons. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2012;38:89-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-011-0170-x
  6. Dreizin D, Munera F. Multidetector CT for penetrating torso trauma: state of the art. Radiology 2015;277:338-55. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015142282
  7. Quinn AC, Sinert R. What is the utility of the Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) exam in penetrating torso trauma?. Injury 2011;42:482-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.07.249
  8. Bansal V, Reid CM, Fortlage D, Lee J, Kobayashi L, Doucet J, et al. Determining injuries from posterior and flank stab wounds using computed tomography tractography. Am Surg 2014;80:403-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481408000425
  9. Berardoni NE, Kopelman TR, O'Neill PJ, August DL, Vail SJ, Pieri PG, et al. Use of computed tomography in the initial evaluation of anterior abdominal stab wounds. Am J Surg 2011;202:690-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.032
  10. Bruckner BA, Norman M, Scott BG. CT Tractogram: technique for demonstrating tangential bullet trajectories. J Trauma 2006;60:1362-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000197146.77853.6d
  11. Uzunosmanoglu H, Corbacioglu SK, Cevik Y, Akinci E, Hacifazlioglu C, Yavuz A, et al. What is the diagnostic value of computed tomography tractography in patients with abdominal stab wounds?. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2017;43:273-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-015-0625-6
  12. Cothren CC, Moore EE, Warren FA, Kashuk JL, Biffl WL, Johnson JL. Local wound exploration remains a valuable triage tool for the evaluation of anterior abdominal stab wounds. Am J Surg 2009;198:223-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.11.024
  13. Schnuriger B, Lam L, Inaba K, Kobayashi L, Barbarino R, Demetriades D. Negative laparotomy in trauma: are we getting better?. Am Surg 2012;78:1219-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481207801128
  14. Goodman CS, Hur JY, Adajar MA, Coulam CH. How well does CT predict the need for laparotomy in hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating abdominal injury? A review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:432-7. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1927
  15. Jawad H, Raptis C, Mintz A, Schuerer D, Mellnick V. Single-contrast CT for detecting bowel injuries in penetrating abdominopelvic trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;210:761-5. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.18496
  16. Bang HJ, Kim K, Shim H, Kim S, Jung PY, Choi YU, et al. Delta neutrophil index for predicting mortality in trauma patients who underwent emergent abdominal surgery: a case controlled study. PLoS One 2020;15:e0230149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230149
  17. Demetriades D, Hadjizacharia P, Constantinou C, Brown C, Inaba K, Rhee P, et al. Selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries. Ann Surg 2006;244:620-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200610000-00017
  18. Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Gumber AO, Wong CS. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of penetrating abdominal trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2016;34:127-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.524
  19. Demetriades D, Rabinowitz B. Indications for operation in abdominal stab wounds. A prospective study of 651 patients. Ann Surg 1987;205:129-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198702000-00005
  20. Peev MP, Chang Y, King DR, Yeh DD, Kaafarani H, Fagenholz PJ, et al. Delayed laparotomy after selective non-operative management of penetrating abdominal injuries. World J Surg 2015;39:380-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2813-7
  21. van Haarst EP, van Bezooijen BP, Coene PP, Luitse JS. The efficacy of serial physical examination in penetrating abdominal trauma. Injury 1999;30:599-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(99)00159-X