Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제20권5호
  • /
  • Pages.543-556
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An adapted weakening and high damping approach for seismic protection of structures

  • Bahar, Arash (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Guilan) ;
  • Salavati-Khoshghalb, Mohsen (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Guilan) ;
  • Ejabati, Seyed Mehdi (Department of Civil Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2021.01.27
  • 심사 : 2021.04.28
  • 발행 : 2021.05.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Seismic isolation is widely used in the structures to dissipate the destructive energy of an earthquake by decoupling the superstructure from the ground. High-damping rubber (HDR) devices, as a type of energy dissipating device, used in structural systems to control the structural response under energetic excitations such as earthquakes. This paper uses the Weakening and Damping (WeD) scheme to realize a modified approach in reducing all of the structural responses simultaneously. By this modification, Negative Stiffness Devices (NSDs) are used for the weakening phase to lessen lateral strength. The HDR device is used as a part of NSDs components. HDR generates a high damping force to establish a modified "Weakening and High Damping" (WeHD) concept and gain optimal performance in the overall structural responses. Use of the HDR in seismic base isolation not only prevents permanent deformation under strong motions but also works as an energy dissipating device even during the small ambient vibrations. Since the structure could be unstable by using NSDs, MR dampers are added to preserve stability. An inverse model is employed to command MR dampers by adjusting the voltage and generating the desired control forces. To further verify the proposed WeHD device, a smart base-isolated benchmark building framework is used. Based on the results, the proposed Weakening and High Damping (WeHD) approach not only reduces base displacements, accelerations, and shear but also leads to a reduction in the accelerations and inter-story drifts of the superstructure.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aiken, I. and Kikuchi, M. (1997), "An analytical hysteresis model for elastomeric seismic isolation bearings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 26(2), 215-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199702)26:2<215::AID-EQE640>3.0.CO;2-9.
  2. Attary, N., Symans, M., Nagarajaiah, S., Reinhorn, A.M., Constantinou, M.C., Taylor, D. and Pasala, D.T.R. (2013), "Performance assessment of a highway bridge structure employing adaptive negative stiffness for seismic protection", In Structures Congress 2013: Bridging Your Passion with Your Profession.
  3. Attary, N., Symans, M.D., Nagarajaiah, S., Reinhorn, A.M., Constantinou, M.C., Taylor, D. and Sarlis, A.A. (2012), "Performance evaluation of a seismically-isolated bridge structure with adaptive passive negative stiffness", In Proc. of Fifteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE), September.
  4. Attary, N., Symans, M., Nagarajaiah, S., Reinhorn, A.M., Constantinou, M.C., Sarlis, A.A. and Taylor, D. (2015b), "Numerical simulations of a highway bridge structure employing passive negative stiffness device for seismic protection", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44(6), 973-995. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2495.
  5. Attary, N., Symans, M., Nagarajaiah, S., Reinhorn, A.M., Constantinou, M.C., Sarlis, A.A. and Taylor, D. (2015a), "Performance evaluation of negative stiffness devices for seismic response control of bridge structures via experimental shake table tests", J. Earthq. Eng., 19(2), 249-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2014.962672.
  6. Bahar, A., Pozo, F., Acho, L., Rodellar, J. and Barbat, A. (2010a), "Parameter identification of large-scale magnetorheological dampers in a benchmark building", Comput. Struct., 88(3-4), 198-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.10.002.
  7. Bahar, A., Pozo, F., Acho, L., Rodellar, J. and Barbat, A. (2010b), "Hierarchical semi-active control of base-isolated structures using a new inverse model of magnetorheological dampers", Comput. Struct., 88(7-8), 483-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.01.006.
  8. Bahar, A., Salavati-Khoshghalb, M. and Ejabati, S.M. (2018), "Seismic protection of smart base-isolated structures using negative stiffness device and regulated damping", Smart Struct. Syst., 21(3), 359-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sss.2018.21.3.359.
  9. Bartera, F. and Giacchetti, R. (2004), "Steel dissipating braces for upgrading existing building frames", J. Construct. Steel Res., 60(3-5), 751-769. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(03)00141-X.
  10. Dall'Asta, A., Dezi, L., Giacchetti, R., Leoni, G. and Ragni, L. (2006), "Application of HDR devices for the seismic protection of steel concrete composite frames: experimental results", Proceedings of STESSA, 587-592.
  11. Dall'Asta, A., Dezi, L., Leoni, G. and Ragni, L. (2008), "Validation of a HDR-based device model by experimental tests on a steel-concrete composite frame", In Proceedings of 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 12-17.
  12. Dall'Asta, A. and Ragni, L. (2008), "Dynamic systems with high damping rubber: Nonlinear behaviour and linear approximation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(13), 1511-1526. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.825.
  13. Dall'Asta, A. and Ragni, L. (2008), "Nonlinear behavior of dynamic systems with high damping rubber devices", Eng. Struct., 30(12), 3610-3618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.06.003.
  14. Fuller, K., Ahmadi, H., Goodchild, I., Magonette, G., Taucer, F. and Dumoulin, C. (2000), "Rubber-based energy dissipators for earthquake protection of structures", In Proceedings of the 12th WCEE.
  15. Govindjee, S. and Simo, J. (1991), "A micro-mechanically based continuum damage model for carbon black-filled rubbers incorporating Mullins' effect", J. Mech. Phy. Solids, 39(1), 87-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(91)90032-J.
  16. Govindjee, S. and Simo, J.C. (1992b), "Mullins' effect and the strain amplitude dependence of the storage modulus", Int. J. Solids Struct., 29(14-15), 1737-1751. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(92)90167-R.
  17. Govindjee, S. and Simo, J. (1992a), "Transition from micromechanics to computationally efficient phenomenology: carbon black filled rubbers incorporating Mullins' effect", J. Mech. Phy. Solids, 40(1), 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(92)90324-U.
  18. Grant, D.N., Fenves, G.L. and Auricchio, F. (2004), "Bridge isolation with high-damping rubber bearings-analytical modelling and system response", In 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, August.
  19. Grant, D.N., Fenves, G.L. and Auricchio, F. (2005), Modelling and analysis of high-damping rubber bearings for the seismic protection of bridges.
  20. Hwang, J.S. and Ku, S.W. (1997), "Analytical modeling of high damping rubber bearings", J. Struct. Eng., 123(8), 1029-1036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:8(1029).
  21. Hwang, J.S. and Wang, J.C. (1998), "Seismic response prediction of HDR bearings using fractional derivative Maxwell model", Eng. Struct., 20(9), 849-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(98)80005-9.
  22. Hwang, J.S., Wu, J.D., Pan, T.C. and Yang, G. (2002), "A mathematical hysteretic model for elastomeric isolation bearings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(4), 771-789. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.120.
  23. Inaudi, J.A. and Kelly, J.M. (1993), "Optimum damping in linear isolation systems", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 22(7), 583-598. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290220704.
  24. Iemura, H. and Pradono, M.H. (2009), "Advances in the development of pseudo-negative-stiffness dampers for seismic response control", Struct. Control Health Monit. Official J. Int. Asso. Struct. Control Monit. Europ. Asso. Control Struct., 16(7-8), 784-799. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.345.
  25. Jung, H.J., Choi, K.M., Spencer Jr, B.F. and Lee, I.W. (2006), "Application of some semi-active control algorithms to a smart base-isolated building employing MR dampers", Struct. Control Health Monit. Official J. Int. Asso. Struct. Control Monit. Europ. Asso. Control Struct, 13(2-3), 693-704. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.106.
  26. Kelly, J.M. (1999a), "The current state of base isolation in the United States", In Proc. Second World Conference on Structural Control, Kyoto, Japan.
  27. Kelly, J.M. (1999b), "The role of damping in seismic isolation", Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 28(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199901)28:1<3::AIDEQE801>3.0.CO;2-D
  28. Molina, F.J., Verzeletti, G., Magonette, G. and Taucer, F. (2000), "Dynamic and pseudodynamic responses in a two storey building retrofitted with rate-sensitive rubber dissipators", In Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand, February.
  29. Nagarajaiah, S, Reinhorn, A.M., Constantinou, M.C., Taylor, D.P., Pasala, D.T. and Sarlis, A.A., (2010), "True Adaptive Negative Stiffness: A New Structural Modification Approach for Seismic Protection", Proceedings of 5th World Conference on Structural Control and Monitoring, Tokyo, Japan.
  30. Narasimhan, S., Nagarajaiah, S., Johnson, E.A. and Gavin, H.P. (2006), "Smart base-isolated benchmark building. Part I: problem definition", Struct. Control Health Monit. Official J. Int. Asso. Struct. Control Monit. Europ. Asso. Control Struct, 13(2-3), 573-588. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.99.
  31. Pasala, D.T.R., Sarlis, A.A., Nagarajaiah, S., Reinhorn, A.M., Constantinou, M.C. and Taylor, D. (2013), "Adaptive negative stiffness: New structural modification approach for seismic protection", J. Struct. Eng., 139(7), 1112-1123. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000615.
  32. Ramallo, J.C., Johnson, E.A. and Spencer Jr, B.F. (2002), "Smart base isolation systems", J. Eng. Mech., 128(10), 1088-1099. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:10(1088).
  33. Reinhorn, A.M., Viti, S. and Cimellaro, G. (2005), "Retrofit of structures: Strength reduction with damping enhancement", In Proceedings of the 37th UJNR panel meeting on wind and seismic effects, 16-21.
  34. Sarlis, A.A., Pasala, D.T.R., Constantinou, M.C., Reinhorn, A.M., Nagarajaiah, S. and Taylor, D. (2011), "Negative stiffness device for seismic protection of structures-an analytical and experimental study", In COMPDYN 2011, Proc. of 3rd ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Corfu, Greece.
  35. Sarlis, A.A., Pasala, D.T.R., Constantinou, M.C., Reinhorn, A.M., Nagarajaiah, S. and Taylor, D.P. (2013), "Negative stiffness device for seismic protection of structures", J. Struct. Eng., 139(7), 1124-1133. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000616.
  36. Skinner, R.I., Robinson, W.H. and McVerry, G.H. (1993), An Introduction to Seismic Isolation, John Wiley & Sons.
  37. Soong, T.T. and Costantinou, M.C. (2014), Passive and Active Structural Vibration Control in Civil Engineering, (Vol. 345), Springer.
  38. Spencer, Jr, B.F. and Nagarajaiah, S. (2003), "State of the art of structural control", J. Struct. Eng., 129(7), 845-856. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:7(845).
  39. Tsai, C.S., Chiang, T.C., Chen, B.J. and Lin, S.B. (2003), "An advanced analytical model for high damping rubber bearings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32(9), 1373-1387. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.278.
  40. Viti, S., Cimellaro, G.P. and Reinhorn, A.M. (2006), "Retrofit of a hospital through strength reduction and enhanced damping", Smart Struct. Syst., 2(4), 339-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sss.2006.2.4.339.
  41. Yang, J.N. and Agrawal, A.K. (2002), "Semi-active hybrid control systems for nonlinear buildings against near-field earthquakes", Eng. Struct., 24(3), 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00094-3.