Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Intention to Solve the Problem via the Prior Experience of Creativity Programs based on the Action Learning Methodology

액션러닝방법론에 기반한 창의성프로그램 참여경험에 따른 문제해결의도의 영향에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Soung-Hyun (Dept. of Phronesis School of Convergence, Kyungnam University) ;
  • Park, JaeSung (Business Incubation Center, Chonnam National University)
  • 김승현 (경남대학교 프로네시스융합학부) ;
  • 박재성 (전남대학교 창업보육센터)
  • Received : 2021.04.21
  • Accepted : 2021.06.20
  • Published : 2021.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study identified the factors that influence the problem solving intention of students who completed the action learning-based creativity programs based on the theory of reasoned action, and examined the influence relationship between these factors. As a result of the study, first, subjective norms of problem solving had a positive effect on problem solving intention, and second, attitude toward problem solving had a significant effect on problem solving intention. Third, it was found that students who had experience of participating in a patent education program applying the action learning methodology had a positive effect on the relationship between their attitude toward problem solving and their intention to solve the problem. These findings confirmed that in order to enhance the problem-solving intention, which is the basis for creativity of university students, it is important to spread the positive value of problem-solving within the university and to give students a positive attitude toward problem solving.

본 연구는 합리적행위이론을 기반으로 액션러닝 기반 창의성 프로그램을 이수한 학생들의 문제해결의도에 영향을 주는 요인들을 파악하고 이들 요인들 간의 영향관계를 살펴보았다. 연구결과, 첫째 문제해결에 대한 주관적 규범은 문제해결의도에 긍정적 영향을 주었고, 둘째 문제해결에 대한 태도는 문제해결의도와 유의미한 영향관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째 액션러닝방법론을 적용한 특허출원교육 프로그램의 참여경험이 있는 학생의 경우 문제해결에 대한 태도와 문제해결의도와의 관계에 있어 긍정적 영향효과를 주는 것으로 파악되었다. 이러한 연구결과는 대학생들의 창의성 기반이 되는 문제해결의도를 제고하기 위해서 대학 내 문제해결에 대한 긍정적 가치 공유의 확산과 아울러 학생들 자기주도적 문제해결에 대한 긍정적 자세를 갖게 하는 것이 중요함을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. J. Park. (2017). How can we Develop Students' Creativity?: Redesigning a Creativity Program based on Flow Theory, Journal of Practical Engineering Education, 9, 91-98. DOI : 10.14702/JPEE.2017.091
  2. B.J. Barron, D.L. Schwartz, N.J. Vye, A. Moore, A. Petrosino, L. Zech & J.D. Bransford. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem-and project-based learning, Journal of the learning sciences, 7, 271-311. DOI : 10.1080/10508406.1998.9672056
  3. C.M. Borden. (1992). Collaboration, for better or for worse, Knowledge, 14, 133-142. DOI : 10.1177/107554709201400107
  4. S. Bailin. (2012). Achieving extraordinary ends: An essay on creativity, Springer Science & Business Media. DOI : 10.3102/00028312006002287
  5. R.J. Sternberg & T.I. Lubart. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development, Human development, 34, 1-31. DOI : 10.1159/000277029
  6. R. Weisberg. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of creativity, New York: Freeman.
  7. T.I. Lubart & C. Mouchiroud. (2003). Creativity: A source of difficulty in problem solving, The psychology of problem solving, 127-148. DOI : 10.1017/cbo9780511615771.005
  8. J.W. Getzels. (1982). The problem of the problem, New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Question framing and response consistency, 11, 37-49.
  9. J. Park. (2018). A study on the direction of entrepreneurship education in the age of 4th Industrial Revolution: Focusing on the effect of entrepreneurship education types, Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Society, 13, 40-67. DOI : 10.24878/tkes.2018.13.1.040
  10. H. Jung & S. Moon. (2012). An Analysis of Action Learning Process in Education Programs for Senior Officials, Engineers, Chief Executive Officers, Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(1), 87-104. DOI : 10.14400/JDPM.2012.10.1.087
  11. R.W. Revans. (1982). What is action learning?, Journal of management development. 1(3), 64-75. DOI : 10.1108/eb051529
  12. M.J. Marquardt. (2000). Action learning and leadership, The learning organization. DOI : 10.1108/09696470010352990
  13. R.L. Dilworth & V.J. Willis. (2003). Action Learning: Images and Pathways. Professional Practices in Adult Education and Lifelong Learning Series, ERIC2003.
  14. H.C. Bong. (2007). Key Success Factors of Action Learning Programs in Korean Companies: Contents and Relationships, Koreanische Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftswissenschaften, 25, 1-34.
  15. S.G. Isaksen, K.B. Dorval & D.J. Treffinger. (2010). Creative approaches to problem solving: A framework for innovation and change, Sage Publications.
  16. R.J. Hill, M. Fischbein & I. Ajzen. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Contemporary Sociology, 6(2), 244. DOI : 10.2307/2065853
  17. R.J. Hill, M. Fischbein & I. Ajzen. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Contemporary Sociology, 6(2), 244. DOI : 10.2307/2065853
  18. G.C. Moore & I. Benbasat. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation, Information systems research, 2, 192-222. DOI : 10.1287/isre.2.3.192
  19. J.M. Lee, J.C. Mowen & M. Minor. (1998). Instructor's Manual: John C. Mowen/Michael Minor Consumer Behavior, Prentice-Hall.
  20. H.L. Chiesi, G.J. Spilich & J.F. Voss. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge, Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 18, 257-273. DOI : 10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90146-4
  21. W. Alba & J. Hutchinson. (1987). Effects of Context and Post-Category on Recall of Competing Brands, Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411-454. DOI : 10.1177/002224378502200309
  22. D. Ausubel, J. Novak & H. Hanesian. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive view, New York: Werbel & Peck.
  23. G.S. Yoon. (1994). The effects of instructional control, cognitive style, and prior knowledge on learning of computer-assisted instruction, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 22, 357-370. DOI : 10.2190/8avp-req0-hahc-1yjh
  24. C.W. Park & V.P. Lessig. (1981). Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristics, Journal of consumer research, 8, 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1086/208859
  25. A.R. Rao & K.B. Monroe. (1988). The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations, Journal of consumer research, 15, 253-264. DOI : 10.1086/209162
  26. T.F. Mangleburg, M.J. Sirgy, D. Grewal, D. Axsom, M. Hatzios, C. Claiborne & T. Bogle. (1998). The moderating effect of prior experience in consumers' use of user-image based versus utilitarian cues in brand attitude, Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 101-113. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1022927201433
  27. D.L. Hoffman & T.P. Novak. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations, Journal of marketing, 60, 50-68. DOI : 10.2307/1251841
  28. J. Park. (2018). A Study on User Acceptance of Patent Application Education System : Focused on the Effect of Prior Knowledge, Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(3), 75-85. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2018.16.3.
  29. S.Y. Kuh. (2015). Behavioral intentions of luxury brands : structual relations among the influences - focusing on the theory of reasoned action, Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 28, 2789-2815. UCI : G704-001438.2015.28.6.015
  30. J.F. Hair, W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, R.E. Anderson & R. Tatham. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Uppersaddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  31. J.C. Nunnally. (1994). Psychometric theory 3E, Tata McGraw-hill education. DOI : 10.2307/1175619