Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of family supportive supervisor behaviors on employees' performances

상사의 가족친화적 행동이 종업원 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Young-Hyoung (Department of IT Convergence, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 김영형 (금오공과대학교 IT융합학과)
  • Received : 2021.03.03
  • Accepted : 2021.06.20
  • Published : 2021.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to investigate differences in the level of family supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSB) by supervisor demographic characteristics (gender, marriage) and to explore the effect of FSSB on employees' work engagement, subjective well-being, and family performance. A total of 346 cases were analyzed. The results showed that there was no significant difference was found in the level of FSSB of male and female supervisor, but there was significant difference was found in the level of FSSB of married and unmarried supervisor. And the result also showed that there were positive relationship between FSSB and employees' work engagement and FSSB and subjective well-being and family performance.

본 연구는 상사의 가족친화적 행동이 종업원의 직장에서 성과와 가정에서 성과에 미치는 영향을 종합적으로 분석해보고 더불어 상사의 가족친화적 행동 수준이 어떤 인구통계적 특성에 따라 차이가 있는지 분석하여 최근 증가하고 있는 가족친화적 근로환경 조성을 위한 방안을 제안하고자 한다. 경북거주 불특성 직장인을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시했고, 총346개의 표본이 연구에 사용되었다. 가설검증을 위해 t-test, 회귀분석을 실시했다. 연구결과 성별에 따라 상사의 가족친화적 행동 수준 차이는 없었으나 결혼유무에 따라서는 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 상사의 가족친화적 행동은 종업원의 업무몰입, 종업원의 주관적 웰빙, 가족내 역할성과에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 연구결과를 바탕으로 시사점 및 미래 연구 방향을 제시하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by Kumoh National Institute of Technology. (2017-104-023)

References

  1. A. M. Ryan & E. E. Kossek (2008). Work-life policy implementation: Breaking down or creating barriers to inclusiveness? Human Resource Management, 47(2), 295-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20213
  2. T. D. Allen (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 414-435. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2000.1774
  3. M. Blair-Loy & A. S. Wharton (2002). Employees' use of work-family policies and the workplace social context. Social Forces, 80(3), 813-845. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2002.0002
  4. G. R. Cinamon. & Y. Rich. (2010). Work family relations: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Career Assessment, 18(1), 59-70. ttps://doi.org/10.1177/1069072709340661
  5. L. M. Lapierre & T. D. Allen (2006). Work-supportive family, family-supportive supervision, use of organizational benefits, and problem-focused coping: Implications for work-family conflict and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(2), 169-181. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.11.2.169.
  6. A. McCarthy, C. Darcy & G. Grady (2010). Work-life balance policy and practice: Understanding line manager attitudes and behaviors. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.12.001
  7. D. L. Snow, S. C. Swan, C. Raghavan, C. M. Connell & I. Klein (2003). The relationship of work stressors, coping and social support to psychological symptoms among female secretarial employees. Work & Stress, 17(3), 241-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370310001625630
  8. P. V. Roehling, M. V. Roehling & P. Moen (2001). The relationship between work-life policies and practices and employee loyalty: A life course perspective. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22(2), 141-170. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016630229628
  9. M. Blair-Loy & A. S. Wharton (2002). Employees' use of work-family policies and the workplace social context, Social Forces, 80(3), 813-845. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2002.0002
  10. L. B. Hammer, E. E. Kossek, N. L. Yragui, T. E. Bodner & G. C. Hanson (2009). Development and validation of a multidimensional measure of family supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSB). Journal of Management, 35(4), 837-856. doi:10.1177/0149206308328510.
  11. P. Lirio, M. D. Lee, M. L. Williams, L. K. Haugen & E. E. Kossek (2008). The inclusion challenge with reduced-load professionals: The role of the manager. Human Resource Management, 47(3), 443-461. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20226
  12. E. E. Kossek, S. Lewis & L. B. Hammer (2010). Work-life initiatives and organizational change: Overcoming mixed messages to move from the margin to the mainstream. Human relations, 63(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709352385
  13. A. B. Bakker, E. Demerouti & M. F. Dollard (2008). How job demands affect partners' experience of exhaustion: Integrating work-family conflict and crossover theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 901-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.901
  14. L. S. Matthews, R. D. Conger & K. Wickrama (1996). Work-family conflict and marital quality: Mediating processes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(1), 62-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787119
  15. G. Van Daalen, T. M. Willemsen & K. Sanders (2006). Reducing work-family conflict through different sources of social support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(3), 462-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.07.005
  16. W. W. Maddux, & M. B. Brewer (2005). Gender differences in the relational and collective bases for trust. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(2), 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430205051065
  17. G. R. Salancik & J. Pfeffer (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224-253. doi:10.2307/2392563
  18. J. Bagger & A. Li (2014). How does supervisory family support influence employees' attitudes and behaviors? A social exchange perspective. Journal of Management, 40(4), 1123-1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311413922
  19. Y. P. Chen, M. Shaffer, M. Westman, S. Chen, M. Lazarova & S. Reiche. (2014). Family role performance: Scale development and validation. Applied Psychology, 63(1), 190-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12005
  20. S. Mauno, U. Kinnunen, & M. Pyykko (2005). Does work-family conflict mediate the relationship between work-family culture and self-reported distress? Evidence from five Finnish organizations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 509-530. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X37082
  21. J. A. Breaugh & N. K. Frye. (2004). Family-friendly policies, supervisor support, workfamily conflict, family-work conflict, and satisfaction: A test of a conceptual model. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19, 197-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-004-0548-4
  22. N. K. Frye, & J. A. Breaugh (2004). Family-friendly policies, supervisor support, work-family conflict, family-work conflict, and satisfaction: A test of a conceptual model. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(2), 197-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-004-0548-4
  23. W. B. Schaufeli, A. B. Bakker, & M. Salanova (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and psychological measurement, 66(4), 701-716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
  24. H. M., Banks, C. W., Clegg, N. J., Jackson, E. M., Stafford, & T. D. Wall, (1980). The use of the general health questionnaire as an indicator of mental health in occupational studies. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1980.tb00024.x
  25. Straub, C. (2012). Antecedents and organizational consequences of family supportive supervisor behavior: A multilevel conceptual framework for research. Human Resource Management Review, 22, 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.08.001
  26. H. N. Odle-Dusseau, T. W. Britt, & T. M. Greene-Shortridge. (2012). Organizational work-family resources as predictors of job performance and attitudes: The process of work-family conflict and enrichment. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology; Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(1), 28-40. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026428