DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

전문가 집단의 글쓰기 담론 연구: 유튜브(YouTube)를 중심으로

Writing Discourse Study in a Group of Professionals: Focusing on YouTube

  • 조영권 (전북대학교 정치외교학과)
  • Cho, Young-kwon (Department of Political Science and Diplomacy, Jeonbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2021.04.28
  • 심사 : 2021.06.20
  • 발행 : 2021.06.28

초록

이 논문은 유튜브(YouTube) 영상에 나타나는 작가와 소설가, 글쓰기 강사 등 전문가들의 글쓰기에 관한 담론을 서사 분석 방법으로 연구했다. 분석 결과 글쓰기 담론을 구성하는 다섯 가지 핵심 주제는 첫 번째가 글쓰기를 위한 적극적 독서, 두 번째 쉼 없이 쓰고 더 많이 쓰기, 세 번째 재능보다 열 번 고쳐 쓰기, 네 번째 1인 미디어 시대, 구어체로 글쓰기, 다섯 번째가 소셜 미디어에서 피드백 나누기였다. 전문가들의 글쓰기 담론은 소셜 미디어 시대의 글쓰기의 변화를 잘 보여주고 있었다. 첫째는 읽기 중심에서 쓰기와 고쳐 쓰기 중심으로 글쓰기 문화의 중심이 이동했음을 확인할 수 있었다. 둘째, 소셜 미디어 시대의 글쓰기는 자연스럽게 말하듯 글을 쓰는 구어체가 지배적인 코드가 되었음을 알 수 있었다. 셋째, 소셜 미디어 시대 글쓰기는 공개적으로 피드백을 나누는 협력과 공유의 사회적 글쓰기인 점이 확인되었다. 이러한 결과는 향후 미디어와 글쓰기에 관한 연구에 시사하는 바가 크다.

This paper analyzed the discourse on writing by experts such as writers, novelists, and writing instructors appearing in YouTube videos through narrative analysis methods. According to the analysis, the five key topics comprising writing discourse were: Active reading for writing, Nonstop writing and writing more, Rewriting 10 times more than talent, Writing in spoken language in the era of one-person media, Sharing feedback on social media. The writing discourse of professionals illustrated the change in writing in the age of social media. First, it was confirmed that the writing culture shifted from reading to writing and rewriting. Second, writing in the social media era naturally showed that the spoken language of writing became the dominant code. Third, it has been confirmed that writing in the social media era is social writing of cooperation and sharing that openly share feedback. These findings will have significant implications for future research on media and writing

키워드

참고문헌

  1. H. K. Lee. (2004). The history of Korean internet behavior and growth.. www.sciencetimes.co.kr.
  2. Wikipedia. Social Media. https://ko.wikipedia.org.
  3. J. H. Lee. (2012). SNS as a Writing Space: Remediation, Metonymy, and Ekphrasis. Communication Theories, 8(1), 323-351.
  4. C. Y. Chang. (2003), A Study of a Teaching-Learning Strategy of Digital Writing . Korean Literature Theory and Criticism, 7 (3), pp. 400.
  5. J. R. Shin. (2012). E-book and Internet Writings Impact on Literature. Kogito (71), 435-466.
  6. Y. J. Koo & S. W. Lim. (2021). A Study on the Literary Education and Media Convergence Teaching Model in Digital Age(Unterrichtsmodell fur literarische Bildung und Medien-Konvergenz im digitalen Zeitalter). German Linguistics Vol. 91 417-438.
  7. K. H. Jang. (2003). A Trial on Restruction of Written Language/spoken Language and Their Styles. Korean Semantics. 13. 143-165.
  8. D. H. Lee. (2010). Tertiary Orality: The Presence of the Word in the Age of 'New New Media'. Journal of Communication Research, 47 (1), 43-76. https://doi.org/10.22174/jcr.2010.47.1.43
  9. C. G. Min. (2015). A Study on Communication and Writing in the New Media Era. Korean Journal of General Education 9: 1, 181-212.
  10. S. K. Hwang, (2012). The rhetorical persuasive Structure of Media Writing, Korean Journal of Rhetoric, 16, 193-223.
  11. S. K. Hwang. (2014). A Study about the Writing Influence of the SNS(Social Networking Service). Ratio et Oratio, Vol. 7 No. 1, 148-149.
  12. N. H. Jang. (2011). Literature/Media Education and Making Literature-Complex, Korean Literature Education Research. Vol. 35, pp. 190-192.
  13. I. K. Park. (2020. 10. 8). Eight out of 10 people use YouTube in Korea. https://biz.chosun.com.
  14. H. S. Kim. (2004). A Meta-analysis of the Study of Television Narratives Broadcast Research, Winter Issue, 174.
  15. Daniel Chandler. Semiotics for Beginners.: I. G. Kang. trans. (2006). Serniotics for Bigginners. Seoul. Somyung.
  16. S. O. Kim. (2009). The meaning of discourse and language analysis context discourse. Paju: Korean Academic Information, 27-47.
  17. Stefan Titscher, Michael Meyer, Ruth Wodak and Eva Vetter. (2000). Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. Sage.: S. B. Nam, trans.. (2015). Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. Seoul. Kyungjin. 200.
  18. S. H. Kim. Y. K. Cho. & H. D. Kim. (2007). A study on how to analyze media text. French Literature and Art, 21, 103-133.
  19. L. R. Oswald. (2012). Marketing Semiotics: Signs, Strategies, and Brand Value. Oxford University Press: C. H. Um trans.. (2013). Marketing Semiotics. Seoul: Communicationbooks. 86-100.
  20. Daniel Chandler. (2005) Semiotics for Beginners.: I. G. Kang. trans..(2006). Media Semiotics. Seoul: Somyung. 148.
  21. C. Barker & D. G. Inski. (2001). Cultural Studiis and Discorse Analysis. London: Sage; Titsher, M. Meyer. (2000). Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage; Y. K. Cho. (2006). Methodology of Political Discourse Analysis. Local Autonomy Studies, 11. 19-40.
  22. Daniel Chandler. (2005) Semiotics for Beginners.: I. G. Kang. trans..(2006). Media Semiotics. Seoul: Somyung. 149.
  23. Norman Fairclogh. (2003). Analysing Discourse. Routledge.: J. H. Kim. trans.. (2012). Analysing Discourse. Seoul: kyungjin, 195-198.
  24. Daniel Chandler. (2005) Semiotics for Beginners.: I. G. Kang. trans..(2006). Media Semiotics. Seoul: Somyung. 180.
  25. L. R. Oswald. (2012). Marketing Semiotics: Signs, Strategies, and Brand Value. Oxford University Press; C. H. Um trans.. (2013). Marketing Semiotics. Seoul: Communicationbooks. 153.
  26. S. W. Jang, S. K. Shin, H. S. Lee. & J. Y. Park. (2007), Broadcasting Writing. Seoul: CommunicationBooks.
  27. J. Y. Shin.. (1999). A Study on the Text Counstruction of Current Spoken Korean. Textlinguistics 7. 209-227.
  28. S. J. Han. (2007). Writing a Broadcast Composition Script. Seoul: RandomHouseKorea.