DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Driving behavior Analysis to Verify the Criteria of a Driver Monitoring System in a Conditional Autonomous Vehicle - Part II -

부분 자율주행자동차의 운전자 모니터링 시스템 안전기준 검증을 위한 운전 행동 분석 -2부-

  • Received : 2020.11.18
  • Accepted : 2020.12.06
  • Published : 2021.03.31

Abstract

This study aimed to verify the criteria of the driver monitoring systems proposed by UNECE ACSF informal working group and the ministry of land, infrastructure, and transport of South Korea using driving behavior data. In order to verify the criteria, we investigated the safety regulations of driver monitoring systems in a conditional autonomous vehicle and found that the driver monitoring measures were related to eye blinks times, head movements, and eye closed duration. Thus, we took two different experimental data including real-world driving and simulator-based drowsy driving behaviors in previous studies. The real-world driving data were used for analyzing blink times and head movement intervals, and the drowsiness data were used for eye closed duration. In the drowsy driving study, 10 drivers drove approximately 37 km of a monotonous highway (about 22 min) twice. The results suggested that the appropriate duration of eyes continuously closed was 4 seconds. The results from real-world driving data were presented in the other paper - part 1.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 국토교통부 교통물류연구사업의 연구비 지원(과제번호 20TLRP-B131486-04)에 의해 수행되었다.

References

  1. SAE International, 2018, "Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-road Motor Vehicles", Standard No. J3016.
  2. 박명옥, 손준우, 2019, "조건부 자율주행자동차 (Level 3)의 제어권 전환 안전성 평가를 위한 기준 시나리오 개발", 한국자동차공학회논문집, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 309~317.
  3. Lu, Z., Happee, R., Cabrall, C. D., Kyriakidis, M., de Winter, J. C., 2016, "Human factors of transitions in automated driving: A general framework and literature survey". Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, Vol. 43, pp. 183~198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.007
  4. UNECE, Transport-Vehicle Regulations, Automatically Commanded Steering Function (ACSF) Retrieved from https://wiki.unece.org/ display/trans/ACSF+23rd+session.
  5. 국토교통부, 자동차 및 자동차부품의 성능과 기준에 관한 규칙-별표27 부분 자율주행시스템의 안전기준, Retrieved from https://www.law.go.kr/법령/자동차및자동차부품의성능과기준에관한규칙.
  6. 손준우, 박명옥, "부분 자율주행자동차의 운전자 모니터링 시스템 안전기준 검증을 위한 실도로 운전행동 분석 -1부-", 자동차안전학회지, 2021, in press.
  7. Seeing Machines, 2008, FaceLAB4 User Manual, Canberra, Australia.
  8. Son, J., Park, M., 2017, "Situation awareness and transitions in highly automated driving a framework and mini-review". J Ergonomics Vol. 7, No. 212.
  9. Aerstedt, T., Gillberg, M., 1990, "Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual", International Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 52, pp. 29~37. doi:10.3109/00207459008994241
  10. Shahid, A., Wilkinson, K., Marcu, S., Shapiro, C. M., 2011, "Stanford sleepiness scale (SSS)", In STOP, THAT and one hundred other sleep scales, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 369~370.
  11. Dingus, T. A., Klauer, S. G., Neale, V. L., Petersen, A., Lee, S. E., Sudweeks, J., et al., 2006, The 100-car naturalistic driving study, Phase II-Results of the 100-car field experiment (Report No. HS-810 593). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
  12. Vlakveld, W., van Nes, N., de Bruin, J., Vissers, L., van der Kroft, M., 2018, "Situation awareness increases when drivers have more time to take over the wheel in a Level 3 automated car: A simulator study", Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, Vol. 58, pp. 917~929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.07.025
  13. Samuel, S., Borowsky, A., Zilberstein, S., Fisher, D. L., 2016, "Minimum time to situation awareness in scenarios involving transfer of control from the automation", In Transportation research board (TRB) annual meeting, Vol. 16-7788, Washington DC.
  14. National Sleep Foundation, Facts About Drowsy Driving, Retrieved from https://drowsy driving.org/about/facts-and-stats/.
  15. Son, J., Park, M., Park, B. B., 2015, "The effect of age, gender and roadway environment on the acceptance and effectiveness of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems", Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 31, pp. 12~24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.03.009
  16. Son, J., Lee, Y., Kim, M. H., 2011, "Impact of traffic environment and cognitive workload on older drivers' behavior in simulated driving", International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 135~141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-011-0017-8