DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring the Direction of School Library Assessment

학교도서관 평가의 방향성 탐구

  • 이지연 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 이연희 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2021.04.26
  • Accepted : 2021.05.20
  • Published : 2021.05.31

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the current status of school library assessment and generate discussion points for the development directions of the assessment. Surveys, consulting, and evaluations related to school libraries conducted by the Office of Education, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism were analyzed using meta-evaluations and in-depth interviews with the school librarians. The analysis revealed problems such as duplication of evaluation by various institutions, no reflection of the national school library development plan, low participation rate due to voluntary nature of the assessment, and lack of the educational evaluation index. The solution to the problem was a school libraries' operation evaluation improvement plan. The plan included the legal evaluation agent specification, the national school library development plan incorporation, inter-agency evaluation network & the case sharing system establishment, and the Office of Education's investigation and consulting cooperation.

본 연구의 목적은 학교도서관 평가 실태를 분석하여 학교도서관 평가의 발전 방향에 대한 시사점을 얻으려는 데에 있다. 이를 위해 교육부, 교육청 및 문화체육관광부를 중심으로 수행되는 학교도서관 관련 조사, 컨설팅 및 평가를 메타평가를 활용하여 분석하고, 사서교사를 대상으로 심층 면담 조사를 실시하였다. 분석 결과, 각 기관의 평가 중복, 국가의 학교도서관 발전계획의 반영 미비, 공모형 평가로 인한 참여율 저조, 교육 평가지표 미비 등의 문제점이 발견되었다. 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위한 학교도서관 운영평가의 개선방안은 법률에 평가 주체의 역할 명시, 국가의 도서관 발전계획의 반영, 기관 간 평가 네트워크 구축, 사례 공유 시스템 운영, 교육청의 조사 및 컨설팅과 전국 도서관 운영 평가의 연계 방안 마련을 제안하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 문화체육관광부 도서관정책기획단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구의 데이터 일부를 활용하여 작성되었음.

References

  1. Kang, Bong-Suk (2019). A study on the school library staffs perceptions of school library evaluation. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(1), 293-312. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.2.201906.149
  2. Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education (2020). Instructions and Guidelines for Consulting on the Operation of School Libraries. The Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education.
  3. Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education (2020). The School Library Consulting Plan. Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education.
  4. Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education (2020). The School Library Status Survey Plan. Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education.
  5. Higher Education Act. Law No.17492.
  6. Kwak, Chul-Wan & Noh, Young-Hee (2009). A study of development of the school library evaluation criteria. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 20(2), 183-196.
  7. Special Act on Information Disclosure of Educational-Related Institutions. Law No. 17007.
  8. Ministry of Education (2019). The 3rd basic plan for the promotion of school libraries (2019~ 2023). The Ministry of Education.
  9. Ministry of Education (2020). Press Release of Basic Statistical Results for Education. Available: https://www.moe.go.kr
  10. Ministry of Education (2020). Guidelines for Surveying Basic Statistics on Kindergarten, Elementary School, and Middle School Education. Ministry of Education.
  11. Ministry of Education (2020). The School Information Disclosure. Korea Education and Research Information Service. Ministry of Education.
  12. Kwon, Soon-Dal (2017). Evaluation of the Meta-Evaluation Tool. Journal of Education Evaluation, 30(4), 595-614.
  13. Kim, Min-Ah & Kim, Hye-Sook (2019). A comparative study on the elementary school teacher evaluation system in Korea and Japan: focusing on the meta-evaluation. The Journal of Korean Education, 46(3), 1-36.
  14. Kim, Sung-Jun (2011). A study on the improvement of evaluation indicators of school libraries in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 45(3), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.45.3.201409.5
  15. Kim, Eun-Ju (2019). A comparative study of an oda country program evaluation using the meta-evaluation model. Journal of International Development Cooperation, 14(2), 3-38.
  16. Kim, Jai-Gwan (2013). Meta-evaluation on the business evaluation systems of the local government enterprise in Jeollabuk-Do. Korean Journal of Local Government and Administration Studies, 27(3), 49-70. https://doi.org/10.18398/kjlgas.2013.27.3.49
  17. Nam, Young-Joon, Lee, Soo-Young, & Chang, Bo-Sung (2008). The study of BSC balanced scorecard of school library. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(2), 277-294. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.2.201106.277
  18. Nam, Young-Joon & Jung, Kyeng-Ae (2010). A study on the new evaluation index of school library. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(3), 99-131. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.41.3.201009.99
  19. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. Library Act. Law No.17706.
  20. Committee on Library Information Policy (2020). National Library Operation Evaluation Results Report. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism.
  21. Committee on Library and Information Policy (2020). The National Library Operation Evaluation Plan. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism.
  22. Ryu, Youngsoo (2020). Meta evaluation on National R&D program self-evaluation. Korean Journal of Policy Analysis and Evaluation, 30(3), 79-108. https://doi.org/10.23036/KAPAE.2020.30.3.004
  23. Mun, Youngse (2005). Meta evaluation on the evaluation system of Korean Government: the case study of National Defense Department. Korean Society and Public Administration, 16(1), 179-204.
  24. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. National Library Statistics System. Available: https://www.libsta.go.kr
  25. Park, Min-Young (2020). A study on meta evaluation of processing department supervision and investigation by central administrative agencies. The Korean Journal of Archival, Information and Cultural Studies, 11, 155-185.
  26. Park, Chong-Won (2012). Qualitative Data Analysis: NVivo 12 Application. Hyungseul, Seoul.
  27. Park, Ju-Hyeon & Hong, Hyun-Jin (2014). A study on the construction of consulting supervision model and the development of evaluation indicators in school libraries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 45(1), 217-248. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.45.1.201403.217
  28. Byun, Ki-Yong, Lee, Suk-Yeol, & Ra, Eun-Jong (2017). A meta-analysis of university financial support projects of the Ministry of Education. Korean Journal of Education Administration, 35, 275-302.
  29. Byun, Woo-Yeoul, Lee, Byeong-Ki, & Kim, Sung-Jun (2011). A study on improving the evaluation system of school libraries in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 45(1), 51-73. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.1.051
  30. Song, Gi-Ho (2009). A study on the activation of school library consulting: based on the schools not employing a teacher librarian. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(2), 335-353. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.40.2.200906.335
  31. Ahn, Chae-Myung & Kang, Keun-Bok (2018). Study on the meta-evaluation of the central government's self-evaluation: focused on the self-evaluation of the ex-ministry of the interior and ministry of public safety and security. Korean Public Administration, 30(1), 29-59. https://doi.org/10.21888/KPAQ.2018.3.30.1.29
  32. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. Early Childhood Education Act. Law No.17954.
  33. Yoon, Su-Jae & Cho, Tae-Jun (2017). Meta-evaluation to the self-evaluation in ODA programs. Korean Governance Review, 24(2), 27-60. https://doi.org/10.17089/kgr.2017.24.2.002
  34. Lee, Ranny (2011). Developing and applying meta-evaluation model to volunteers center. Civil Society and NGO, 9(2), 133-166.
  35. Lee, Byeong-Ki & Song, Gi-Ho (2011). A study on developing evaluation indicators for school library opening to local community. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 22(4), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2011.22.4.115
  36. Lee, Jee-Yeon, Kwon, Na-Hyun, Oh, Moo-Seok, & Park, Young-Sook (2020). A study on the improvement of evaluation indicators and evaluation system for library operations in Korea. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism.
  37. Lim, Jeong-Hoon & Lee, Byeong-Ki (2019). An analysis on priority of school library evaluation index utilizing the AHP. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(2), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.50.2.201906.169
  38. Chung, Jae-Jin (2013). A study on developmental plan and comparative analysis of aim at water utilities evaluation systems. GRI Review, 15(1), 299-324.
  39. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Law No.17954.
  40. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. Statistics Act. Law No.17339.
  41. Ha, Yoo-Kyung et al. (2021). Guidelines for Information Disclosure in Elementary and Secondary Schools. Educational materials. GM 2021-4. The School Information Disclosure. Korea Education And Research Information Service.
  42. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. School Library Promotion Act. Law No.15368.
  43. Korea Education And Research Information Service. Education statistics service. Available: https://kess.kedi.re.kr
  44. Korea Education And Research Information Service. School Information. Available: https://www.schoolinfo.go.kr
  45. Korean Society for Education Evaluation (2004). Educational Evaluation Thesaurus. Hakjisa, Seoul.
  46. Han, Mi-Kyung (2006). Meta Evaluation on National R&D Program. Science and Technology Policy Institute-Policy Data, 1-45.
  47. Hyun, Mi-Ju (2013). A study on the meta-evaluation plan for self-evaluation quality enhancement of development cooperation in korea. journal of international development cooperation, 2013(1), 164-178. https://doi.org/10.34225/jidc.2013.1.164
  48. Larson, R. C. & Berliner, L. (1983). On Evaluating Evaluations. Policy Sciences, 16(2), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138348
  49. Leslie, J. C. & Valerie J. C. (2005). Quanlity, conntext, and use: issues in achieving the goals of meta-evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 30-42.
  50. Orata, P. T. (1940). Evaluating evaluation. Journal of Educational Research, 33(9), 641-661. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1940.10880956