DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

간호대학생을 대상으로 플립드 러닝을 활용한 사례기반학습의 효과

The effect of case-based learning based on flipped learning for nursing students

  • 투고 : 2021.01.22
  • 심사 : 2021.03.02
  • 발행 : 2021.05.31

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of case-based learning based on flipped learning in a pathophysiology course for nursing students. Methods: Participants were sophomore nursing students enrolled in a pathophysiology course. The experimental group (n=42) received the case-based learning in class after similar case-based learning in a pre-class based on flipped learning, while the control group (n=39) received the usual flipped learning. Data were analyzed by χ2-test, independent t-test, and ANCOVA using SPSS WIN 21.0. Results: There were significant differences in self-directed learning ability (F=10.93, p=.001), self-efficacy (F=5.45, p=.022), problem-solving ability (F=6.11, p=.016), and critical thinking disposition (F=6.76, p=.011) between the experimental group and the control group. Conclusion: The application of case-based learning based on flipped learning in a pathophysiology course for nursing students was effective in improving problem-solving and self-directed learning abilities, self-efficacy, and the critical thinking disposition of sophomore nursing students.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lee MH, Park MS. The effect of case-based learning (CBL) on critical thinking disposition, communication ability, problem solving ability and self-directed learning ability of nursing students in pathophysiology course. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science. 2016;3(18):176-184. http://doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.2016.18.3.176
  2. Kaddoura MA. Critical thinking skills of nursing students in lecture-based teaching and case-based learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 2011;5(2):1-20. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2011.050220
  3. Gray M, Aspland T. Midwifery practice in the university context: Perspectives of postgraduate students on the effectiveness of case-based learning in preparation for the workplace. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 2011;6(2):38-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2010.07.003
  4. Lee YS, Eun Y. The effect of the flipped learning on self-efficacy, critical thinking disposition, and communication competence of nursing students. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2016;22(4):567-576. http://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2016.22.4.567
  5. Han SJ, Jung HC. Study on the effect and experience of the flipped Learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology. 2016;6(1);101-108. https://doi.org/10.35873/AJMAHS.2016.6.1.011
  6. Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem-solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Science. 1988;12(2):257-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
  7. Van Merrienboer JJ, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Medical Education. 2010;44(1):85-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03498.x.
  8. Hsieh S, Hsu L, Huang T. The effect of integrating constructivist and evidence-based practice on baccalaureate nursing student's cognitive load and learning performance in a research course. Nurse Education Today. 2016;42:1-8. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.025
  9. Kim MS, Park JH, Park KY. Development and effectiveness of a drug dosage calculation training program using cognitive loading theory based on smartphone. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2012;42(5):689-698. http://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2012.42.5.689
  10. Seo HS. An analysis of requisite knowledge body of physiology for nursing education. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 1995;2(2):229-237.
  11. Yoo JS, Ahn JA, Yeo KS, Chu SH. Study to reorganize the course of basic nursing science in a college of nursing. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science. 2008;10(2):162-169.
  12. Park MK. The effects of RME on elementary school students' learning motivation and problem-solving in algorithm learning [master's thesis]. Cheongju: Korea National University of Education; 2011. p. 1-85.
  13. Heppner PP, Peterson CH. The development and implications of personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1982;29(1):66-75. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.29.1.66
  14. Kang MH, Song YH, Park SH. Relationships among metacognition, flow, interactions and problem solving ability in web-based problem based learning. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction. 2008;12(2):293-315. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2008.12.2.293
  15. Wiley K. Effects of a self-directed learning project and preference for structure on self-directed learning readiness. Nursing Research. 1983;32(3):181-185. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198305000-00011
  16. Guglielmino LM. Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale. Dissertation Abstracts International. 1977;38(11a):6467.
  17. Park JH. A study on self-leadership of adult learners in business [master's thesis]. Seoul: Korea University; 1998. p. 1-87.
  18. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. 1977;84(2):191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  19. Sherer M, Maddux JE, Mercandante B, Prentice-Dunn S, Jacobs B, Rogers RW. The self-efficacy scale: construction and validation. Psychological Reports. 1982;51(2):663-671. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663
  20. Hong HY. Relationship of perfectionism, self-efficacy and depression [master's thesis]. Seoul: Ewha University; 1995. p. 1-73.
  21. Facione NC, Facione PA, Sanchez CA. Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: The development of the California critical thinking disposition inventory. Journal of Nursing Education. 1994;33(8):345-350. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19941001-05
  22. Kwon IS, Lee GE, Kim GD, Kim YH, Park KM, Park HS, et al. Development of a critical thinking disposition scale for nursing students. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2006;36(6):950-958. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2006.36.6.950
  23. Seels BB, Richey RC. Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology; 1994. p. 184.
  24. Lee JJ. An investigation on the evaluation model and evaluation criteria of e-learning teaching-learning system for quality management. Journal of Holistic Convergence Education. 2006;10(1):75-91.
  25. Kang JS. Development and evaluation of a web-based health promotion program for patients with metabolic syndrome [dissertation]. Seoul: Kyounghee University; 2011. p. 1-126.
  26. Kim SH. The effects of blended case-based learning on cognitive problem-solving and social problem-solving [master's thesis]. Seoul: Kookmin University; 2012. p. 1-90.
  27. McLaughlin JE, Griffin LM, Esserman DA, Davidson CA, Glatt DM, Roth MT, et al. Pharmacy student engagement, performance, and perception in a flipped satellite classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2013;77(9):196. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe779196.
  28. Mikkelsen TR. Nursing students' experiences, perceptions and behavior in a flipped-classroom anatomy and physiology course. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. 2015;5(10):28-35. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v5n10p28
  29. Enfield J. Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. Tech Trends. 2013;57(6):14-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0698-1
  30. Bergmann J, Sams A. Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Arlington: International Society for Technology in Education; 2012. p. 112.