DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Postural Control Ability according to the Various Video Contents during Action Observations

  • Goo, Bon Wook (Department of Medical Science, Graduate School, Daegu Haany University) ;
  • Lee, Mi Young (Department of Physical Therapy, College of biomedical Science, Daegu Haany University)
  • Received : 2021.01.12
  • Accepted : 2021.02.24
  • Published : 2021.02.28

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the effects of the type of video contents used for action observations on the ability to control posture. Methods: The participants were 48 healthy adults. The two hands of the participants were crossed on both shoulders, and the other foot was placed in a straight line in front of the target to allow them to watch a video of the monitor. The videos were presented in random order with three video contents (natural, stable balance posture, and unstable balance posture) consisting of 30 seconds each. A 15-second resting time was given between each video. During action observation using various video content forms, the posture control ability was measured using a TekScan MetScan® system. Results: The results revealed statistically significant differences in the area of movement and the distance by COP and distance by the type of action-observation videos, and the distance by the anteroposterior and mediolateral sides (p<0.05). The stable balance posture and unstable balance posture video showed significant differences in the distance by the COP, anteroposterior, and mediolateral distance. (p<0.05) Conclusion: This study suggests that choosing the contents of the videos is important during action-observation training, and action-observation training can help improve postural control.

Keywords

References

  1. Pendergrass TL, Moore JH, Gerber JP. Postural control after a 2-mile run. Mil Med. 2003;168(11):896-903. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/168.11.896
  2. Pollock AS, Durward BR, Rowe PJ et al. What is balance? Clin Rehabil. 2000;14(4):402-6. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215500cr342oa
  3. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2016:
  4. Prieto TE, Myklebust JB, Myklebust B. Characterization and modeling of postural steadiness in the elderly: a review. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1993;1(1):26-34.
  5. Winter DA, Patla AE, Prince F et al. Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80(3):1211-21. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1998.80.3.1211
  6. Winter DA, Prince F, Frank J et al. Unified theory regarding a/p and m/l balance in quiet stance. J Neurophysiol. 1996;75(6):2334-43. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1996.75.6.2334
  7. Gillette JC, Abbas JJ. Foot placement alters the mechanisms of postural control while standing and reaching. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2003;11(4):377-85.
  8. Henry SM, Fung J, Horak FB. Control of stance during lateral and anterior/posterior surface translations. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1998;6(1):32-42.
  9. Nashner L, Cordo P. Relation of automatic postural responses and reaction-time voluntary movements of human leg muscles. Exp Brain Res. 1981;43(3-4):395-405.
  10. Romero DH, Stelmach GE. Changes in postural control with aging and parkinson's disease. IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2003;22(2):27-31.
  11. Kim SH, Kim TH, Hwang HC. Effects of spinal stabilization exercises using visual feedback on gross motor function and balance in children with cerebral palsy. J Kor Phys Ther. 2019;31(5):279-85. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2019.31.5.279
  12. Son SM, Kang KW. Effect of action observation training using y-balance on balance capability in young adults. J Kor Phys Ther. 2020;32(2):65-9. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2020.32.2.65
  13. Song IY, Seo YS, Kang YH. Effects of 10-week body stability exercise program on functional movement and body balance of middle school volleyball players. J Kor Phys Ther. 2020;32(4):203-9. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2020.32.4.203
  14. Um YJ, Jang HY, Lee SM. Taping therapy simultaneously applied to the ankle and hip joint: effect on balance and gait in patients with chronic stroke. J Kor Phys Ther. 2019;31(1):49-55. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2019.31.1.49
  15. Yang H, Lim H. Effects of trunk control rehabilitation robot training on dynamic balance, lower extremity strength, gait ability and pain in bipolar hemiarthroplasty. J Kor Phys Ther. 2019;31(2):94-102. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2019.31.2.94
  16. Zeng W, Guo Y, Wu G et al. Mirror therapy for motor function of the upper extremity in patients with stroke: a meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(1):8-15. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2287
  17. Ertelt D, Small S, Solodkin A et al. Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage. 2007;36:T164-T73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.043
  18. Bhoraniya SH, Mishra DG, Parikh S. The effect of mirror therapy on the gait of chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2018;8(9):1321-5.
  19. Fu J, Zeng M, Shen F et al. Effects of action observation therapy on upper extremity function, daily activities and motion evoked potential in cerebral infarction patients. Medicine. 2017;96(42):e8080. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008080
  20. Sale P, Ceravolo MG, Franceschini M. Action observation therapy in the subacute phase promotes dexterity recovery in right-hemisphere stroke patients. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:457538. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/457538
  21. Pelosin E, Barella R, Bet C et al. Effect of group-based rehabilitation combining action observation with physiotherapy on freezing of gait in parkinson's disease. Neural Plasticity. 2018;2018:4897276. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4897276
  22. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2(9):661-70. https://doi.org/10.1038/35090060
  23. Fogassi L, Ferrari PF, Gesierich B et al. Parietal lobe: From action organization to intention understanding. Science. 2005;308(5722):662-7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106138
  24. Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V et al. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cogn Brain Res. 1996;3(2):131-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0
  25. Brass M, Bekkering H, Wohlschlager A et al. Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain Cogn. 2000;44(2):124-43. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2000.1225
  26. Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L et al. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain. 1996;119(2):593-609. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.2.593
  27. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:169-92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
  28. Rajmohan V, Mohandas E. Mirror neuron system. Indian J Psychiatry. 2007;49(1):66. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.31522
  29. De Vries S, Mulder T. Motor imagery and stroke rehabilitation: a critical discussion. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(1):5-13. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0020
  30. Buccino G, Riggio L. The role of the mirror neuron system in motor learning. Kinesiology. 2006;38(1):5-15.
  31. Malouin F, Belleville S, Richards CL et al. Working memory and mental practice outcomes after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(2):177-83 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00771-8

Cited by

  1. The Effect of Coordinative Locomotor Training Using Elastic Bands on the Flexibility and Body Alignment of Elementary School Right-Handed Baseball Players vol.33, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2021.33.5.217