Journal of Veterinary Clinics (한국임상수의학회지)

The Korean Society of Veterinary Clinics (한국임상수의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relationships between Biological Factors during the Voluntary Waiting Period and Reproductive Performance in Dairy Cows

  • Shin, Dong-Hyun (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Jeong, Jae-Kwan (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kang, Hyun-Gu (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Ill-Hwa (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University)
  • Received : 2021.03.09
  • Accepted : 2021.03.17
  • Published : 2021.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We aimed to identify the biological factors during the voluntary waiting period (VWP) that are associated with subsequent reproductive performance in dairy cows. Two hundred and one pregnant dairy cows had their body condition score (BCS) evaluated and blood samples taken 4 weeks before calving, at calving, and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after calving, to measure serum metabolite and progesterone concentrations. In addition, any peri- and postpartum disorders within 4 weeks of calving, and the mean milk yields 4 and 8 weeks postpartum, were recorded. The cows were allocated to two groups according to whether they had become pregnant or not by 120 days after calving: a pregnant group (n = 50) and a non-pregnant group (n = 151). Analyses of serum metabolite concentrations showed that the aspartate aminotransferase and γ-glutamyltransferase activities 2 weeks (p < 0.05) and the non-esterified fatty acid concentration 6 weeks (p < 0.01) postpartum were higher in the non-pregnant than in the pregnant group. However, the albumin concentrations between 2 and 8 weeks and the total cholesterol and magnesium concentrations between 4 and 8 weeks postpartum were lower in the non-pregnant group (p < 0.05). The BCS (p < 0.05) and percentages of cows that had resumed cyclicity (p < 0.001) by 6 and 8 weeks postpartum were higher in the pregnant than in the non-pregnant group, whereas the incidence of peri- and postpartum disorders was higher in the non-pregnant group (p < 0.05). In conclusion, high serum enzyme activities, which imply liver damage, imbalances in energy metabolites and magnesium, and a higher incidence of peri- and postpartum disorders, are associated with poorer reproductive performance, whereas high BCS and early resumption of cyclicity during the VWP are associated with superior reproductive performance in dairy cows.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdelli A, Raboisson D, Kaidi R, Ibrahim B, Kalem A, Iguer-Ouada M. Elevated non-esterified fatty acid and β-hydroxy-butyrate in transition dairy cows and their association with reproductive performance and disorders: A meta-analysis. Theriogenology 2017; 93: 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.01.030
  2. Bell AW, Burhans WS, Overton TR. Protein nutrition in late pregnancy, maternal protein reserves and lactation performance in dairy cows. Proc Nutr Soc 2000; 59: 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665100000148
  3. Berglund B. Genetic improvement of dairy cow reproductive performance. Reprod Dom Anim 2008; 43(Suppl 2): 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01147.x
  4. Carvalho PD, Souza AH, Amundson MC, Hackbart KS, Fuenzalida MJ, Herlihy MM, Ayres H, Dresch AR, Vieira LM, Guenther JN, Grummer RR, Fricke PM, Shaver RD, Wiltbank MC. Relationships between fertility and postpartum changes in body condition and body weight in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2014; 97: 3666-3683. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7809
  5. Cheong SH, Sa Filho OG, Absalon-Medina VA, Pelton SH, Butler WR, Gilbert RO. Metabolic and endocrine differences between dairy cows that do or not ovulate first postpartum dominant follicles. Biol Reprod 2016; 94: 1-11.
  6. Edmonson AJ, Lean IJ, Weaver LD, Farver T, Webster G. A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1989; 72: 68-78. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79081-0
  7. Gautam G, Nakao T, Yamada K, Yoshida C. Defining delayed resumption of ovarian activity postpartum and its impact on subsequent reproductive performance in Holstein cows. Theriogenology 2010; 73: 180-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.08.011
  8. Goff JP. The monitoring, prevention, and treatment of milk fever and subclinical hypocalcemia in dairy cows. Vet J 2008; 176: 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.12.020
  9. Kawashima C, Karaki C, Munakata M, Matsui M, Shimizu T, Miyamoto A, Kida K. Association of rumen fill score and energy status during the close-up dry period with conception at first artificial insemination in dairy cows. Anim Sci J 2016; 87: 1218-1224. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12555
  10. Kessel S, Stroehl M, Meyer HHD, Hiss S, Sauerwein H, Schwarz FJ, Bruckmaier RM. Individual variability in physiological adaption to metabolic stress during early lactation in dairy cows kept under equal conditions. J Anim Sci 2008; 86: 2903-2912. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1016
  11. LeBlanc SJ, Duffield TF, Lesile KE, Bateman KG, Keefe GP, Walton JS, Johnson WH. Defining and diagnosing postpartum clinical endometritis and its impact on reproductive performance in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2002; 85: 2223-2236. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74302-6
  12. LeBlanc S. Assessing the association of the level of milk production with reproductive performance in dairy cattle. J Reprod Dev 2010; 56: S1-7. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.1056S01
  13. LeBlanc SJ. Interactions of metabolism, inflammation, and reproductive tract health in the postpartum period in dairy cattle. Reprod Dom Anim 2012; 47(Suppl 5): 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02109.x
  14. Loeffler SH, de Vries MJ, Schukken YH. The effects of time of disease occurrence, milk yield, and body condition on fertility of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1999; 82: 2589-2604. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75514-1
  15. Lof E, Gustafsson H, Emanuelson U. Factors influencing the chance of cows being pregnant 30 days after the herd voluntary waiting period. J Dairy Sci 2014; 97: 2071-2080. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5874
  16. Lopreiato V, Mezzetti M, Cattaneo L, Ferronato G, Minuti A, Trevisi E. Role of nutraceuticals during the transition period of dairy cows: a review. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2020; 11: 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-020-00501-x
  17. Macmillan K, Gobikrushanth M, Lopez Helguera I, Behrouzi A, Colazo MG. Relationships between early postpartum nutritional and metabolic profiles and subsequent reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2020; 151: 52-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.03.034
  18. Mee JF. Reproductive issues arising from different management systems in the dairy industry. Reprod Dom Anim 2012; 47 (Suppl 5): 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02107.x
  19. Puppel K, Kuczynska B. Metabolic profiles of cow's blood: a review. J Sci Food Agric 2016; 96: 4321-4328. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7779
  20. Pursley JR, Kosorok MR, Wiltbank MC. Reproductive management of lactating dairy cows using synchronization of ovulation. J. Dairy Sci 1997; 80: 301-306. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)75938-1
  21. Reist M, Erdin DK, von Euw D, Tschumperlin KM, Leuenberger H, Hammon HM, Morel C, Philipona C, Zbinden Y, Kunzi N, Blum JW. Postpartum reproductive function: association with energy, metabolic and endocrine status in high yielding dairy cows. Theriogenology 2003; 59: 1707-1723. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01238-4
  22. Ribeiro ES, Lima FS, Greco LF, Bisinotto RS, Minteiro APA, Favoreto M, Ayres H, Marsola RS, Martinez N, Thatcher WW, Santos JEP. Prevalence of periparturient diseases and effects on fertility of seasonally calving grazing dairy cows supplemented with concentrates. J. Dairy Sci 2013; 96: 5682-5697. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6335
  23. Ribeiro ES, Gomes G, Greco LF, Cerri RL, Vieira-Neto A, Monteiro PL Jr, Lima FS, Bisinotto RS, Thatcher WW, Santos JE. Carryover effect of postpartum inflammatory diseases on developmental biology and fertility in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99: 2201-2220. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10337
  24. Roche JR, Burke CR, Crookenden MA, Heiser A, Loor JL, Meier S, Mitchell MD, Phyn CVC, Turner SA. Fertility and the transition dairy cow. Reprod Fertil Dev 2017; 30: 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1071/rd17412
  25. Safa S, Soleimani A, Heravi Moussavi A. Improving productive and reproductive performance of Holstein dairy cows through dry period management. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 2013; 26: 630-637. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12303
  26. Santos JEP, Rutigliano HM, Sa Filho MF. Risk factors for resumption of postpartum estrous cycles and embryonic survival in lactating dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci 2009; 110: 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.01.014
  27. Schulz K, Frahm J, Meyer U, Kersten S, Reiche D, Rehage J, Danicke S. Effects of prepartal body condition score and peripartal energy supply of dairy cows on postpartal lipolysis, energy balance and ketogenesis: an animal model to investigate subclinical ketosis. J Dairy Res 2014; 81: 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029914000107
  28. Sheldon IM, Lewis GS, LeBlanc S, Gilbert RO. Defining postpartum uterine disease in cattle. Theriogenology 2006; 65: 1516-1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.08.021
  29. Sordillo LM. Nutritional strategies to optimize dairy cattle immunity. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99: 4967-4982. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10354
  30. Vercouteren MMA, Bittar JH, Pinedo PJ, Risco CA, Santos JEP, Vieira-Neto A, Galvao KN. Factors associated with early cyclicity in postpartum dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98: 229-239. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8460