References
- Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-51.
- Borowsky, R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1996). Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(1), 63-85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.63
- Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12(4), 335-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80014-3
- Diependaele, K., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (2010). Fast phonology and the bimodal interactive activation model. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(5), 764-778. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440902834782
- Doh, J. (2018). On the ambiguity of Korean sentence: Focused on the classification of the types, Asian Cultural Studies Research Institute, 46, 39-72.
- Forster, K. I., & Bednall, E. S. (1976). Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access. Memory and Cognition, 4, 53-61. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213255
- Francis, W. N., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
- Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(2), 256-281. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.113.2.256
- Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 218-233. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1011
- Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103(3), 518-565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518
- Grainger, J., Muneaux, M., Farioli, F., & Ziegler, J. C. (2005). Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(6), 981-998. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000386
- Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., Ford, M., Pulvermuller, F., & MarslenWilson, W. D. (2006). The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage, 30(4), 1383-1400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.048
- Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1996). Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(6), 1331-1356. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.22.6.1331
- Hino, Y., Lupker, S. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2002). Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: Interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 686-713. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.28.4.686
- Hino, Y., Pexman, P. M., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Ambiguity and relatedness effects in semantic tasks: Are they due to semantic coding? Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 247-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.04.001
- Holley-Wilcox, P. (1977, April). The effect of homophony with auditory presentation of stimuli. Proceedings of the 91st Annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
- Hong, J. (2007). A study on disambiguation processing in Korean machine translation. Korean Language Society, 50, 241-267.
- Hong, J., Nam, K., Yoo, H., & Lee, D., Hwang, H. (2000). Korean dictionary of ambiguous Eojeols. Seoul, Korea: Taehaksa.
- Jastrzembski, J. E. (1981). Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology, 13(2), 278-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(81)90011-6
- Jastrzembski, J. E., & Stanners, R. F. (1975). Multiple word meanings and lexical search speed. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(5), 534-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80030-2
- Jun, S. A. (2000). K-ToBI (Korean ToBI ) labelling conventions1. Speech Sciences, 7(1), 143-169.
- Kang, B. M. (2005). Aspect of the use of homonyms. Language Research, 41(1), 1-29.
- Kang, B., & Kim, H. (2009). Frequency of Korean usage: 15 million words based on sejong form semantic analysis corpus. Seoul, Korea: Hankukmunhwasa.
- Kellas, G., Ferraro, F. R., & Simpson, G. B. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(4), 601-609. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.14.4.601
- Kim, J. (2016). Lexical factors that influence the Korean Eojeol recognition (Doctoral Dissertation). Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
- Klein, D. E., & Murphy, G. L. (2001). The representation of polysemous words. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(2), 259-282. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2779
- Klepousniotou, E., & Baum, S. R. (2007). Disambiguating the ambiguity advantage effect in word recognition: An advantage for polysemous but not homonymous words. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.02.001
- Kwon, Y. A., Cho, H. S., Nam, K. (2013). The event-related potential evidence of phonological activation in hangul homophone reading. Journal of Language Sciences, 20(2), 1-12.
- Lee, H. Y. (2010). The representation of Korean ambiguous nouns in the mental lexicon (Master's thesis). Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
- McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86(4), 287-330. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.86.4.287
- Millis, M. L., & Bution, S. B. (1989). The effect of polysemy on lexical decision time: Now you see it, now you don't. Memory and Cognition, 17, 141-147. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197064
- Mirman, D., Strauss, T. J., Dixon, J. A., & Magnuson, J. S. (2010). Effect of representational distance between meanings on recognition of ambiguous spoken words. Cognitive Science, 34(1), 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01069.x
- Park, T. (2003). Subjective frequency estimates of Korean words and frequency effects on word recognition. Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 15(2), 349-366.
- Pexman, P. M., & Lupker, S. J. (1999). Ambiguity and visual word recognition: Can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53(4), 323-334. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087320
- Pexman, P. M., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Semantic ambiguity and the process of generating meaning from print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(6), 1252-1270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1252
- Pexman, P. M., Lupker, S. J., & Jared, D. (2001). Homophone effects in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.27.1.139
- R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 3.5.1) [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
- Rayner, K., Pacht, J. M., & Duffy, S. A. (1994). Effects of prior encounter and global discourse bias on the processing of lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(4), 527-544. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1025
- Rodd, J., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2002). Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), 245-266. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2810
- Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Garrard, P., Bozeat, S., McClelland, J. L., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2004). Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review, 111(1), 205-235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.205
- Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L., & Millikan, J. A. (1970). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon 1. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9(5), 487-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80091-3
- Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.3.1.1
- Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523-568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
- Shin, H., Choi, M. Y., & Choi, M. (2004). Representation of Korean ambiguous verbs. Korean Society of Cognitive and Biopsychology, 16(2), 191-209.
- Shin, J. Y. (2017). Prosodic markers and morphological markers in spoken Korean. Korean Linguistics, 77, 37-63. https://doi.org/10.20405/kl.2017.11.77.37
- Simon, D. A., Lewis, G., & Marantz, A. (2012). Disambiguating form and lexical frequency effects in MEG responses using homonyms. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(2), 275-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.607712
- Wang, W., Li, X., Ning, N., & Zhang, J. X. (2012). The nature of the homophone density effect: An ERP study with Chinese spoken monosyllable homophones. Neuroscience Letters, 516(1), 67-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.059
- Yu, G. S., & Nam, K. C. (2009). Semantic priming effect of Korean lexical ambiguity: A comparison of homonymy and polysemy. Phonetics and Speech Science, 1(2), 63-73.