디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제19권3호
  • /
  • Pages.151-160
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CSR과 경영자성과보상민감도 사이의 관계에 기업지배구조가 미치는 영향

The Impact of Corporate Governance on the Relationship between CSR and Managers' Compensation-Performance Sensitivity

  • Hwang, Seong-Jun (Dept. of Business Administration, Pusan National University) ;
  • Ryu, Su-Jeon (Dept. of Business Administration, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2020.11.16
  • 심사 : 2021.03.20
  • 발행 : 2021.03.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 CSR이 경영자성과보상민감도에 미치는 영향을 확인하고, 지배구조가 효율적으로 운영되는지의 여부에 이러한 관련성에 차이가 나타나는지를 확인하는 것이다. 분석을 위한 표본은 2011-2017년 KOSPI상장기업을 대상으로 하였으며, 회귀분석을 수행하여 관련성을 확인하였다. 연구결과는 첫째, CSR을 수행하는 기업에서 회계성과보상민감도는 음(-)의 관계, 주식성과보상민감도는 양(+)의 관계가 나타났다. 둘째, CSR과 경영자성과보상민감도는 지배구조의 형태에 따라 달라지는데, CSR을 수행하는 기업에서는 지배구조가 효율적일 때 경영자보상제도와 대체적으로 상호 보완하는 역할을 하는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 CSR을 수행하는 기업에서 경영자의 의사결정을 장기적인 관점에서 주주 이익을 높이는 방향으로 유인하기 위해서는 기업 내 효과적인 경영자유인보상제도를 설계할 필요성이 있음을 시사한다. 또한, 지배구조와의 관계를 파악하여 서로 중복되는 장치들을 줄이거나 개선한다면 기업 가치를 높이는데 기여할 수 있을 것이며, 이와 관련한 후속연구가 진행될 필요성이 있다고 판단된다.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of CSR on the managers' compensation-performance sensitivity, and to determine whether there are differences in this relationship as the governance structure is more efficient. The sample for analysis was from KOSPI-listed companies in 2011-2017, and regression analysis was performed to confirm the relevance. The results are as follows: First, in CSR company, there was a negative relationship for managers' compensation-accounting performance sensitivity and a positive relationship for managers' compensation-stock performance sensitivity. Second, CSR and the managers' compensation-performance sensitivity vary depending on the type of corporate governance. In CSR companies, when the corporate governance is effective, the managerial compensation system generally complements each other. These results suggest that there is a need to design an effective manager's compensation system within the company in order to induce managers' decision-making in the direction of increasing shareholder profits in a long-term perspective in CSR companies. In addition, if we identify the relationship with the governance structure and reduce or improve the devices that overlap each other, it is believed that it will contribute to enhancing corporate value.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Economic Glossary. https://termsnaver.com/entrynhn?docId=300425&cid=43665&categoryId=43665
  2. C. J. Yoo. (2014). Review of an Evolutionary Process and Outcomes of Corporate Philanthropic Activities. Korean Journal of Marketing. 29(2). 55-79.
  3. Y. Cai, H. Jo. & C. Pan. (2011). Vice or virtue? The impact of corporate social responsibility on executive compensation. Journal of Business Ethics. 104. 159-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0909-7
  4. E. Sadok, G. Omrane & C. Y. Kwok & M. Dev. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?. Journal of Banking & Finance. 35(9). 2388-2406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007
  5. Y. Kim. M. Park & B. Wier. (2012). Is Earnings Quality Associated with Corporate Social Responsibility? The Accounting Review. 87(3). 761-796. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10209
  6. M. L. Pava & J. Krausz. (1996). The association between corporate social responsibility and financial performance, The paradox of social cost. Journal of Business Ethics. 15. 321-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382958
  7. S. H. Teoh, I. C. Welch, P. W. Paul. (1999). The Effect of Socially Activist Investment Policies on the Financial Markets: Evidence from the South African Boycott Source. The Journal of Business. 72(1). 35-89. https://doi.org/10.1086/209602
  8. R. E. Freeman. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Bostoni; Pitman Publishing.
  9. M. Potts. (2006). CEO compensation and virtue ethics. The ethics of executive compensation. Wiley Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  10. M. Jensen. & W. Meckling. (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 3. 305-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  11. M. C. Jensen. (1993). Organization Theory and Methodology. The Accounting Review. 334-336.
  12. R. A. Lambert. & D. F. Larcker. (1987). An Analysis of the Use of Accounting and Market Measures of Performance in Executive Compensation Contracts. Journal of Accounting Research. 85-125.
  13. R. G. Sloan. (1993). Accounting Earnings and Top Executive Compensation. Journal of Accounting and Economics. (16). 55-100.
  14. T. S. Kim, J. S. Jeong & S. K. Chi. (1999). Relationship between Management Compensation and Management Performance in Korean Companies. Korean Accounting Review. 24(2). 87-107.
  15. K. Karim. E. J. Lee. & S. H. Suh.. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and CEO compensation structure. Advances in Accounting. 40. 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2017.11.002
  16. B. J. Park. (2018). The Effect of Managerial Ownership and CSR Performance on Managerial Compensation. Korean Business Education Review. 33(2). 113-136. DOI:10.23839/kabe.2018.33.2.113
  17. H. W. Cho & B. J. Park. (2017) Corporate Social Responsibility and the Sensitivity of Executive Compensation to Accounting Performance. Accounting Information Review. 35(2). 89-113. DOI : 10.29189/KAIAAIR.35.2.4
  18. Y. S. Kang, J. H. Lee, K. Baek. (2018). CEO Compensation and Corporate Social Responsibility. The Korean Journal Of Financial Management. 35(3). 139-164. DOI : 10.22510/kjofm.2018.35.3.006
  19. S. J. Hwang. & D. I. Kim. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and executive performance-impact on compensation sensitivity. International Conference on Convergence Technology. 10(9). 221-228.
  20. S. A Waddock. & S. B. Graves. (1997). The corporate social performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (4), 303-319.
  21. Y. K. Lee & J. K. Ko (2013). The effect of corporate social responsibility on the cost of equity capital and information asymmetry. Korean Accounting Journal. 22(5).
  22. H. J. Choi. & D. C. Moon. (2013). The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibilities and Accounting Transparency. 38(1). 135-171.
  23. L. Jin, D. H. Yang, Y. D. Hong. & J. H. Choi. (2016). International Comparison of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Value: Korea and China. Korean Accounting Journal. 25(5). 67-112.
  24. D. Y. Song & S. C. Jeong. (2014). Corporate Governance Structure and Managerial Compensation in Korea. The Korean Journal of Financial Management. 31(4). 179-207.
  25. S. J. Cheng. & R. J. indjejikian. (2009). The Market for Corporate Control and CEO Compensation: Complements or Substitutes? Comtemporary Accounting Research. 26(3). 701-728. DOI : 10.1506/car.26.3.3
  26. F. Black. & M. Scholes. (1973). The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. The Journal of Political Economy. 81(3). 637-654. https://doi.org/10.1086/260062