DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Online Social Relations Service Utilization on Life Satisfaction of Middle-aged and Older Adults : Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Social Support

중·고령자의 온라인 사회관계 서비스 활용도가 삶의 만족도에 미치는 영향 : 사회적 지지의 매개효과를 중심으로

  • Um, Sa-Rang (Dept. of Gerontology, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Shin, Hye-Ri (Dept. of Gerontology, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Sun (Dept. of Gerontology, AgeTech-Service Convergence Major, Kyunghee University)
  • 엄사랑 (경희대학교 노인학과) ;
  • 신혜리 (경희대학교 노인학과) ;
  • 김영선 (경희대학교 노인학과 고령서비스-테크 융합전공)
  • Received : 2020.06.22
  • Accepted : 2021.03.20
  • Published : 2021.03.28

Abstract

This study aims to verify the mediating effect of social support in the relationship between online social relations service utilization(PC, mobile) and life satisfaction for middle-aged and Older Adults. For this purpose, the '2017 Digital Devide Survey' data collected by the National Information Society Agency was used, and among 2,300 middle-aged and Older Adults aged 55 or older, 1,488 people using the Internet were selected as the final analysis target. Then, using the structural equation, the mediating effect of social support was verified in the between online social relations service utilization and life satisfaction. As a result, it was verified that higher levels of mobile-based social relations service utilization have a positive effect on social support and life satisfaction. Also, it was confirmed that social support has a mediating effect in the relationship between the utilization of mobile-based social relations service and life satisfaction. However, the utilization of PC-based social relations services did not show to affect social support and life satisfaction. Therefore, the results of this study can be used as basic data for practical measures to increase the connection between mobile-based social relationship service education and social support promotion education for middle-aged and Older Adults. In addition, the study is meaningful in that it overcomes the limitations of measuring the use of online social relations services as one, and selects tools that are practically effective by dividing them into mobile and PC.

본 연구는 중·고령자의 온라인 사회관계 서비스 활용도(PC, 모바일)와 삶의 만족도 간의 관계에서 사회적 지지의 매개효과를 검증하고자 한다. 이를 위해 한국정보화진흥원에서 수집한 '2017년도 디지털 정보격차 실태조사' 데이터를 활용하였으며, 만 55세 이상 중·고령자 2,300명 중 인터넷을 이용하는 1,488명을 최종 분석대상자로 선정하였다. 이후 구조방정식을 활용하여 온라인 사회관계 서비스 활용도와 삶의 만족도의 관계에서 사회적 지지의 매개효과를 검증하였다. 그 결과 모바일 기반 사회관계 서비스 활용 수준이 높을수록 사회적 지지와 삶의 만족도가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 또한 모바일 기반 사회관계 서비스 활용도와 삶의 만족도와의 관계에서 사회적 지지는 부분 매개 효과를 가지는 것으로 확인하였다. 그러나 PC 기반 사회관계 서비스 활용도는 사회적 지지와 삶의 만족도에 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 본 연구의 결과는 중·고령자의 모바일 기반 사회관계 서비스 활용 교육과 사회적 지지 증진 교육과의 연계성을 높이거나 사회적 지지를 함께 활용하여 효과적인 삶의 만족도 증진시킬 수 있는 실천적 방안의 기초자료로 활용 가능하다. 또한 온라인 사회관계서비스 활용도를 하나로 측정했던 한계점을 극복하고, 모바일과 PC로 구분하여 실질적으로 효과가 높은 도구를 선별해내었다는 것에 연구의 의의를 가진다.

Keywords

References

  1. KISTEP. (2020). Science and Technology Joint Emergency Action Series "The future that Corona 19 will change beyond the height of the crisis in the Corona 19 crisis: Crisis and challenge". https://youtu.be/ltCNm0Fbi-E
  2. Narkwilai, M., Funilkul, S., & Supasitthimethee, U. (2015). Factors influencing the Thai elderly's intention to use social network for Quality of Life: A case study LINE application. In 2015 7th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering(ICITEE), 593-598. DOI : 10.1109/ICITEED.2015.7409016
  3. Y. K. Cho, Y. M. Baek, & B. Y. Kim. (2014). How and Why Does SNS-based Interaction Promote Perceived Social Support?: Focusing on Types of SNS Relationship. Korean Journal of Communication Studies, 22(2), 5-31. UCI : I410-ECN-0102-2015-300-000393895
  4. Best, S. J., & Krueger, B. S. (2006). Online interactions and social capital: Distinguishing between new and existing ties. Social science computer review, 24(4), 395-410. DOI : 10.1177/0894439306286855
  5. Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(5), 584-590. DOI : 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.584
  6. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 12(4), 1143-1168. DOI :10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
  7. Brooke, J., & Jackson, D. (2020). Older people and COVID‐19: Isolation, risk and ageism. Journal of clinical nursing, 2020(29), 2044-2046. DOI : 10.1111/jocn.15274
  8. Victor, C. R., & Bowling, A. (2012). A longitudinal analysis of loneliness among older people in Great Britain. The Journal of Psychology, 146(3), 313-331. DOI : 10.1080/00223980.2011.609572
  9. B. R. Kang, H. S. Kim, & M. S. Lee. (2014). An Analysis of Relationship between Older Adults' Online Information Activities and their Life Satisfaction. Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 48(2), 159-175. DOI : 10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.2.159
  10. J. M. Ra, & H. J. Han. (2015). A Study on the difference in Life Satisfaction According to Smartphone Applications. Social Science Research Review, 31(1), 219-248. DOI : 10.18859/ssrr.2015.02.31.1.219
  11. J. S. Lim, H. J. Cho, & Y. J. Cho. (2014). A Longitudinal Model Study of Life Satisfaction among the Korean Middle and Older adults(over 50 years and over)-Focusing on the mediate effects of the preparation agency for old age and interpersonal relationships and multi-group analys. The Korean Journal of Psychology : General, 33(1), 181-207.
  12. S. J. Sim. (2018). Basic research on life satisfaction of the Older Adults. Daejeon : Korea National Statistical Office.
  13. D. H. Kim, K. S. Ryu, & S. W. Lee. (2011). Factors Determining the Old's Happiness : Based on Public and Private Pension. The Journal of Risk Management, 22(1), 97-123. UCI : I410-ECN-0102-2012-350-002361706 https://doi.org/10.21480/tjrm.22.1.201106.005
  14. T. K. Yoo, & J. H. Ban. (2012). A Study on the Change in Quality of Life Among Mature-aged in Korea. Social Science Research Review, 28(2), 349-372.
  15. M. J. Jun, & S. W. Moon. (2016). An Analysis on the Determinants of Life Satisfaction for the Elderly in Korea -A Comparison between the Capital and Noncapital Regions-. Journal of The Korean Regional Development Association, 28(2), 153-171. DOI : 10.22885/KRDA.2016.28.2.153
  16. Smith, A. E., Sim, J., Scharf, T., & Phillipson, C. (2004). Determinants of quality of life amongst older people in deprived neighbourhoods. Ageing & Society, 24(5), 793-814. DOI:10.1017/S0144686X04002569
  17. Henchoz, Y., Botrugno, F., Cornaz, S., Bula, C., Charef, S., & Santos-Eggimann, B. (2017). Determinants of quality of life in community-dwelling older adults: comparing three cut-offs on the excellent-to-poor spectrum. Quality of life research, 26(2), 283-289. DOI : 10.1007/s11136-016-1394-3
  18. W. S. Yoo, & H. J. Son. (2012). Research on Relationships between Internet Use and the Elderlys Life Quality. Journal of The Korea Contents Association, 12(4), 235-244. DOI : 10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.04.235
  19. Kossakowski, J. J., Epskamp, S., Kieffer, J. M., van Borkulo, C. D., Rhemtulla, M., & Borsboom, D. (2016). The application of a network approach to Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): introducing a new method for assessing HRQoL in healthy adults and cancer patients. Quality of Life Research, 25(4), 781-792. DOI : 10.1007/s11136-015-1127-z
  20. M. H. Seo. (2017). Influences of SNS Use on Life Satisfaction via Upward Social Comparison, Relative Deprivation and Underestimation of Economic Status. Korean Journal of Communication & Information, 83, 72-95. DOI : 10.46407/kjci.2017.06.83.72
  21. Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 14(4), 875-901. DOI : 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x
  22. H. J. Yun. (2009). College Students Mobile Phone Usage Affecting their Social Network and Perceived Social. Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies, 23(5), 173-216. UCI : G704-000045.2009.23.5.002
  23. C. H. Lee, & N. W. Jung. (2014). The Impact of Social Media Use and Motive on Social Capital: Comparison of Open/Closed Social Media. Korean Journal of Communication & Information, 65, 5-26. UCI : G704-000837.2014.65.1.004
  24. Pecino, R. M., Lera, M. J., & Martinez-Pecino, M. (2012). Active seniors and mobile phone interaction. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 40(5), 875-880. DOI : 10.2224/sbp.2012.40.5.875
  25. Y. S. Park, & J. Y. Song. (2012). The moderating effect of Social Supports on the Relationship between Depression and Satisfaction of Life of the old man with a chronic diseas. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Education, 17, 79-96. UCI : G704-SER000010583.2012.17.17.003
  26. Fernandez-Ballesteros, R. (2002). Social support and quality of life among older people in Spain. Journal of Social Issues, 58(4), 645-659. DOI : 10.1111/1540-4560.00282
  27. Rambod, M., & Rafii, F. (2010). Perceived social support and quality of life in Iranian hemodialysis patients. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 42(3), 242-249. DOI : 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01353.x
  28. J. Y. Kim. (2010). The Relationship between Social supports and Satisfaction of Life among the Women Elderly. Journal of Welfare Administration, 20(2), 29-62.
  29. Y. H. Kang. (2016). Effects of Family Support and Social Support on Life Satisfaction of Middle-Aged Men. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(2), 344-353. DOI : 10.5392/jkca.2016.16.02.344
  30. Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75. DOI : 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
  31. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological methodology, 13, 290-312. DOI : 10.2307/270723
  32. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. DOI : 10.1177/002224378101800104
  33. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94. DOI : 10.1007/BF02723327
  34. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Validity. Psychometric theory, 3, 99-132.
  35. S. H. Hong. (2000). The Criteria for Selecting Appropriate Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling and Their Rationales. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 161-177.
  36. Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1-10. DOI : 10.1007/BF02291170
  37. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588. DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  38. Widaman, K. F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(1), 1-26. DOI : 10.1177/014662168500900101
  39. Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park : SAGE Publications.