Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Theoretical Study on the Extended Spatiality of Architecture - Focused on the Conceptual Development & Recognition of Architectural Space Since Modern Architecture -

건축의 확장된 공간성에 관한 고찰 - 근대 건축 이후 건축 공간의 개념적 발전 및 인식을 중심으로 -

  • 김명식 (LH 토지주택연구원 도시재생공간연구실)
  • Received : 2020.10.13
  • Accepted : 2021.01.27
  • Published : 2021.03.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The paper aims at investigating the extended spatiality of architecture, theoretically tracing the conceptual development and Recognition of architectural space toward urban/territorial space. In turn, it traces the physical and visual recognition of space as an interior and the urban/territorial space which is explained by the extended spatiality of architecture with a concept of interiority. The results of this study are as follows. Architecture does not simply create the rooms, but makes them open toward urban/territorial field. Thus, it makes not merely the quality of a building's interior, but also contributes to making the value of urban/territorial interior which pertains to the field of urbanism or landscape architecture. It therefore has a twofold form that affects both interiority. The results have profound implications; one possibility of integrating architectural and urban/territorial spaces and another possibility of an urban/territorial space being recognized by interiority. Both can be new discourses on the fields of architecture, landscape architecture, urbanism and even interior architecture/design to foster interdisciplinary dialogue regarding the enhancement of urban/territorial spatial quality and value. Ultimately, this paper serves as theoretical foundations for theorists and practitioners to give better spatial qualities and values to public interiors and to support for the implementations in today's large urban/territorial development projects.

Keywords

References

  1. Arnheim, R. (1977). The Dynamics of Architectural Form. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London, University of California Press, pp. 30-31, 163.
  2. Brownlee, D., & De Long. D, (1991). Louis I. Kahn: In the Realm of Architecture. New York, Rizzoli, p. 127.
  3. De Carli, C. (1967). "Contro la realta finta." Interni n.1: 2-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001080050137
  4. Dimendberg, E. (2013). Diller Scofidio + Renfro: Architecture after Image. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, p. 165.
  5. Focillon, H. (1992). The Life of Forms in Art. New York, Zone Books, pp. 66, 74.
  6. Forty, A. (2012). Words and Buildings: A Vocabulary of Modern Architecture. London, Thames & Hudson, pp. 256-275.
  7. Holl, S. (2009). Urbanisms: Working with Doubt. New York, Princeton Architectural Press, p. 37.
  8. Kahn, L. (1971). The Room, the Street and Human Agreement. AIA Journal, 56(3): 33-34.
  9. Kim, M. (2014). A Theory of Interior, Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design 23(04), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2014.23.4.103
  10. Kim, M. (2014). The Fusion of Interior/Architecture/Landscape Architecture/Urbanism, Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design 23(05), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2014.23.5.067
  11. Kim, M. (2016). A Theoretical Study on the Form of Continuity as an Architectural Principle, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning and Design Section, 32(08), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2016.32.8.103
  12. Leatherbarrow, D. (2004). Topographical Stories: Studies in Landscape and Architecture. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 1, 5, 8.
  13. Leatherbarrow, D. (2009). Architecture Oriented Otherwise. New York, Princeton Architectural Press, pp. 243, 252.
  14. Moretti, L. (1953). "Strutture e sequenze di spazi." Spazio, 7: 9-20, 107-108.
  15. Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. New York, Rizzoli, pp. 6, 58.
  16. Odgers, J., Samuel, F. and Sharr, A. (2006). Primitive: Original matters in architecture. London, Routledge, pp. 240-250.
  17. Ottolini, G. (1987). "Conformazione e attrezzatura dello spazio aperto". Quaderni del Dipartimento di Progettagione dell'Architecttura, n. 4: 38-50.
  18. Ottolini, G. (1993). Milano illuminata. Milan, Aem, pp. 195-219.
  19. Ottolini, G. (2012). "Forma e significato in architettura." Milano, Cortina, pp. 15-16.
  20. Pallasmaa, J. (2005). The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 40, 55, 71.
  21. Pimlott, M. (2007). Without and Within: Essays on Territory and the Interior. Rotterdam, Episode Publishers, pp. 243-269.
  22. Scott, G. (1999). The Architecture of Humanism: A Study in the History of Taste. New York, W.W. Norton & Company, p. 226.
  23. Venturi, R. (1966). Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture. New York, The Museum of Modern Art, p. 71.
  24. Vitale, S. (1928). L'estetica dell'architettura: saggio sullo sviluppo dello spirito construttivo. Bari, Laterza, pp. 48, 61.
  25. Zevi, B. (1957). Architecture as Space: How to Look at Architecture. New York, Horizon Press, pp. 19, 160, 217, 280.