Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Value of the SH Youth Architects' Project as the Space Welfare Living Lab for the Sustainable Urban Regeneration

지속가능한 도시재생을 위한 공간복지 리빙랩으로써 SH청년건축가 프로젝트의 가치

  • Received : 2020.12.22
  • Accepted : 2021.02.20
  • Published : 2021.03.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to introduce the case of a start-up living lab led by SH Corporation, which can be operated by young architects and residents, and to propose the direction. The purpose of this study is to introduce the case of SH Corporation-led start-up Living Lab, which can be operated by young architects and residents together, and to suggest future improvement directions. This study was conducted in the following processes. First, the definition and background of Living Lab were analyzed. Second, representative cases of domestic living lab operation was analyzed. Third, it revealed the background and purpose of the SH Youth Architect Project. Fourth, the current status, characteristics, and limitations of living labs operated by young architects were analyzed. Finally, the direction of living lab models in urban regeneration projects was proposed.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, K. B., & Park, T. W. (2020). A Study on the Implementation of the CampusTown with the Connection of Smart Living Lab, Proceeding of Annual Conference of Urban Design Institute of Korea, pp.564-570.
  2. Dell'Era & Landoni. (2014). Living Lab: A Methodology between User-Centred Design and Participatory Design: Creativity and Innovation Management 23(2), pp.139.
  3. Daniel Kim., & Seong, J. E. (2015). Living Lab for Sustainable Energy System Transformation : German Botrop Case of SusLab NWE, Science and Technology Policy Institute, STEPI Insight (158), pp.1-39.
  4. Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V. P., & Kulkki, S. (2005). State-of-the-art in utilizing Living Labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation-a European approach. Lulea: Center for Distance-spanning Technology. Lulea University of Technology Sweden: Lulea. Online under: http://www.cdt.ltu.se/main.php/SOA_LivingLabs.pdf.
  5. Han, K. Y., & Lee, J. S. (2019). A study on Deriving key characteristics and factors of Urban Living Lab, Proceeding of Annual Conference of Urban Design Institute of Korea, pp.363-373
  6. Jo, J. H. (2020). Living Lab Key Components and their Effects for the Smart Urban-regeneration Projects-In-depth Case Study on Living Lab in Goyang City, Journal of Urban Design Institute of Korea, 21(5), pp. 51-70. https://doi.org/10.38195/judik.2020.10.21.5.51
  7. Kim, E. J., & Park, Y. I. (2019). A Study on development of Urban Living Lab Evaluation Indicators, Journal of The Korean Regional Development Association, 31(5), pp.17-44. https://doi.org/10.22885/KRDA.2019.31.5.44
  8. Kim, W., Kim, K. M., Hwang, T. K., & Hwang, C. S. (2019). A Study on the Development of User-Involved Living Lab- Focused on the Residential Environment, Proceedings of the KGS Conference, pp.162-163.
  9. Lee, E. K., & Park, E. S. (2019). A Preliminary Study on the Application of Living Lab in Smart Urban Regeneration Project, Proceeding of Annual Conference of Architectural Institute of Korea 39(1), pp.692-695.
  10. Lee, H. K., Jo, H. J., Park, S. H., Lim, H. T., Han, S. M., Kim, J. B., Seo, J. H., Lee, S. H., & Park, Y. N. (2016). Digital Social Innovation and Living Lab : Guide for Citizens, Research Institute for Social Technology and Innovations, pp.1-69.
  11. Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nystrom, A.-G. (2012). Living Labs as Open-Innovation Networks, Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9), pp. 6-11. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview602
  12. Ok, J. A., & Jeoung, H. J. (2019). Living Lab of Gyeonggi-do to Solve Regional Problems with Residents, Gyeonggi Research Institute Issue & Check, 367, pp. 1-25.
  13. Park, J. H., Park, J. W., & Nam, K. W. (2019). A Study on the Activation of Citizen Participation through Living Lab, Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association, 35(3), pp.33-44. https://doi.org/10.22669/KRSA.2019.35.3.033
  14. R. Murray, J. Caulier-Grice, & G. Mulgan. (2010). "The Open Book of Social Innovation", p.3.
  15. Seong, J. E., Han, K. Y., & Jeoung, S. H. (2016). A Case Study of Living Lab in Korea for Resolving Regional Problems. Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 16(2), pp.65-98. https://doi.org/10.22989/JSTS.2016.16.2.003
  16. Seong, J. E., Han, K. Y., & Park, I. Y. (2016). Current Status and Challenges of Living Lab in Korea, Science and Technology Policy Institute STEPI Insight , 184, pp.1-44.
  17. Seong, J. E., & Han, K. Y. (2017). Exploring Possibilities of Intermediary Living Lab as a Platform, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 20(4), pp.915-938 https://doi.org/10.35978/jktis.2017.12.20.4.915
  18. Seong, J. E., Song, W. C., Jung, B. K., Choi, C. B., Youn, C. Y., Jeoung, S. H., & Han, K. Y. (2017). Current Status of Korean Living Labs and Its Development Plan, Science and Technology Policy Institute, pp.1-194.
  19. Song, W. J., Seong, J. E., Kim, J. S., Jang, Y. B., Jeoung, S. H., & Park, I. Y. (2015). Strategy for Socio-Technical System Transition (1st Year), Science and Technology Policy Institute, pp.1-163.
  20. The Seoul Institute, https://www.i-sh.co.kr/shuri/index.do
  21. http://sdgpeople.or.kr/
  22. Naver News, https://news.naver.com/
  23. Bloter, http://www.bloter.net/archives/233883
  24. https://www.facebook.com/shyoutharchitect