Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제77권6호
  • /
  • Pages.721-734
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic control of concrete buildings with nonlinear behavior, considering soil structure interaction using AMD and TMD

  • Mortezaie, Hamid (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Hamedan, Hamedan Branch, Technical and Vocational University (TVU)) ;
  • Zamanian, Reza (Department of Earthquake Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University)
  • 투고 : 2019.03.19
  • 심사 : 2019.10.19
  • 발행 : 2021.03.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The seismic analysis of structures without applying the effects of soil can undermine functional objectives of structure so that it can affect all the desired purposes at the design and control stages of the structure. In this research, employing OpenSees and MATLAB software simultaneously and developing a definite three-dimensional finite element model of a high-rise concrete structure, designed using performance-based plastic design approach, the performance of Tuned Mass Damper (TMD) and Active Mass Damper (AMD) is both examined and compared. Moreover some less noted aspects such as nonlinear interaction of soil and structure, uplift, nonlinear behavior of structure and structural torsion have received more attention. For this purpose, the analysis of time history on the structural model has been performed under 22 far-field accelerogram records. Examining a full range of all structural seismic responses, including lateral displacement, acceleration, inter-story drift, lost plastic energy, number of plastic hinges, story shear force and uplift. The results indicate that TMD performs better than AMD except for lateral displacement and inter-story drift to control other structural responses. Because on the one hand, nonlinear structural parameters and soil-structure interaction have been added and on the other hand, the restriction on the control force applied that leads up to saturation phenomenon in the active control system affect the performance of AMD. Moreover, the control force applied by structural control system has created undesirable acceleration and shear force in the structure.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ASCE (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures: ASCE Standard 7-10, American Society of Civil Engineers.
  2. Agency, F.E.M. (2009), Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, FEMA P695, Washington, DC.
  3. Ahlawat, A. and Ramaswamy, A. (2004), "Multiobjective optimal fuzzy logic controller driven active and hybrid control systems for seismically excited nonlinear buildings", J. Eng. Mech., 130(4), 416-423. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:4(416).
  4. Al-Dawod, M., Samali, B., Kwok, K. and Naghdy, F. (2004), "Fuzzy controller for seismically excited nonlinear buildings", J. Eng. Mech., 130(4), 407-415. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:4(407).
  5. Allaoua, S. and Guenfaf, L. (2019), "LQG vibration control effectiveness of an electric active mass damper considering soil-structure interaction", Int. J. Dyn. Control, 7(1), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-018-0428-9.
  6. Anh, N.D., Bui, H.L., Vu, N.L. and Tran, D.T. (2013), "Application of hedge algebra-based fuzzy controller to active control of a structure against earthquake", Struct. Control Hlth. Monit., 20(4), 483-495. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.508.
  7. ATC, A. (1996), "Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings", Applied Technology Council, report ATC-40. Redwood City.
  8. Australia, S. (2007), "Structural design actions, part 4: earthquake actions in Australia", AS1170, 4.
  9. Bathaei, A., Zahrai, S.M. and Ramezani, M. (2017), "Semi-active seismic control of an 11-DOF building model with TMD+ MR damper using type-1 and-2 fuzzy algorithms", J. Vib. Control, 1077546317696369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546317696369.
  10. Bekdas, G. and Nigdeli, S.M. (2017), "Metaheuristic based optimization of tuned mass dampers under earthquake excitation by considering soil-structure interaction", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 92, 443-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.10.019.
  11. Bigdeli, Y. and Kim, D. (2014), "Active control of 3-D irregular building by using energy based neuro-controller", Adv. Struct. Eng., 17(6), 837-849. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.6.837.
  12. Castaldo, P. and Ripani, M. (2016), "Optimal design of friction pendulum system properties for isolated structures considering different soil conditions", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 90, 74-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.025.
  13. Chinmayi, H. and Jayalekshmi, B. (2013), "Soil-structure interaction analysis of RC frame shear wall buildings over raft foundations under seismic loading", Int. J. Scientif. Eng. Res., 4(5), 99-102.
  14. Council, I.C., Officials, B. and International, C.A. (2000), International Building Code 2000, Dearborn Trade Publishing.
  15. Dai, J.G., Bigdeli, Y. and Kim, D. (2014), "Active control of 3-D irregular building by using energy based neuro-controller", Adv. Struct. Eng., 17(6), 837-850. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.6.837.
  16. FEMA, A. (2005), Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, FEMA-440, Redwood City.
  17. FEMA, F. (1997), NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  18. Gerges, R.R. and Vickery, B.J. (2005), "Optimum design of pendulum‐type tuned mass dampers", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 14(4), 353-368. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.273.
  19. Ghosh, A. and Basu, B. (2004), "Effect of soil interaction on the performance of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications", J. Sound Vib., 274(3), 1079-1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2003.09.060.
  20. Gu, Q. and Ozcelik, O. (2011), "Integrating OpenSees with other software-with application to coupling problems in civil engineering", Struct. Eng. Mech., 40(1), 85-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.40.1.085.
  21. Guclu, R. and Yazici, H. (2008), "Vibration control of a structure with ATMD against earthquake using fuzzy logic controllers", J. Sound Vib., 318(1-2), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2008.03.058.
  22. Hamid Reza Tabatabaiefar, S., Fatahi, B. and Samali, B. (2014), "An empirical relationship to determine lateral seismic response of mid‐rise building frames under influence of soil-structure interaction", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 23(7), 526-548. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1058.
  23. Haselton, C.B., Goulet, C.A., Mitrani-Reiser, J., Beck, J.L., Deierlein, G.G., Porter, K.A., Stewart, J.P. and Taciroglu, E. (2008), "An assessment to benchmark the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete moment-frame building", Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (2007/1).
  24. He, Y.C. and Li, Q. (2014), "Dynamic responses of a 492-m-high tall building with active tuned mass damping system during a typhoon", Struct. Control Hlth. Monit., 21(5), 705-720. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1596.
  25. Jiang, X. and Adeli, H. (2008), "Dynamic fuzzy wavelet neuroemulator for non-linear control of irregular building structures", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 74(7), 1045-1066. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2195.
  26. Khatibinia, M., Gholami, H. and Labbafi, S. (2016), "Multi-objective optimization of tuned mass dampers considering soil-structure interaction", Int. J. Optim. Civil Eng., 6(4), 595-610.
  27. Khoshnoudian, F., Ziaei, R. and Ayyobi, P. (2016), "Effects of nonlinear soil-structure interaction on the seismic response of structure-TMD systems subjected to near-field earthquakes", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9963-y.
  28. Li, L., Song, G. and Ou, J. (2011), "Hybrid active mass damper (AMD) vibration suppression of nonlinear high‐rise structure using fuzzy logic control algorithm under earthquake excitations", Struct. Control Hlth. Monit., 18(6), 698-709. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.402.
  29. Lignos, D.G. and Krawinkler, H. (2012), "Development and utilization of structural component databases for performance-based earthquake engineering", J. Struct. Eng., 139(8), 1382-1394. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000646.
  30. Lin, C.C., Chang, C.C. and Wang, J.F. (2010), "Active control of irregular buildings considering soil-structure interaction effects", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 30(3), 98-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.09.005.
  31. Liu, M.Y., Chiang, W.L., Hwang, J.H. and Chu, C.R. (2008), "Wind-induced vibration of high-rise building with tuned mass damper including soil-structure interaction", J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn., 96(6), 1092-1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2007.06.034.
  32. Mortezaie, H. and Rezaie, F. (2018), "Effect of soil in controlling the seismic response of three-dimensional PBPD high-rise concrete structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 66(2), 217-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.66.2.217.
  33. Mortezaie, H. and Rezaie, F. (2018), "Seismic behavior and dissipated plastic energy of performance-based-designed high-rise concrete structures with considering soil-structure interaction effect", Civil Eng. Infrastr. J., 51(1), 199-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.7508/CEIJ.2018.01.011.
  34. Nigdeli, S.M. and Boduroglu, M.H. (2013), "Active tendon control of torsionally irregular structures under near‐fault ground motion excitation", Comput. Aid. Civil Infrastr. Eng., 28(9), 718-736. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12046.
  35. Ozer, H.O., Hacioglu, Y. and Yagiz, N. (2016), "Suppression of structural vibrations using PDPI+ PI type fuzzy logic controlled active dynamic absorber", J. Brazil. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., 38(7), 2105-2115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-015-0462-x.
  36. Papazafeiropoulos, G., Muniz-Calvente, M. and Martinez-Paneda, E. (2017), "Abaqus2Matlab: A suitable tool for finite element post-processing", Adv. Eng. Softw., 105, 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.01.006.
  37. Paul, S., Yu, W. and Li, X. (2018), "Bidirectional active control of structures with type-2 fuzzy PD and PID", Int. J. Syst. Sci., 49(4), 766-782. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2017.1421724.
  38. Pourzeynali, S., Lavasani, H. and Modarayi, A. (2007), "Active control of high rise building structures using fuzzy logic and genetic algorithms", Eng. Struct., 29(3), 346-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.04.015.
  39. Scott, M.H. (2008). "Extensions of openSees for bridge nanagement applications", Structures Congress 2008: 18th Analysis and Computation Specialty Conference.
  40. Sgobba, S. and Marano, G.C. (2010), "Optimum design of linear tuned mass dampers for structures with nonlinear behaviour", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 24(6), 1739-1755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.01.009.
  41. Shooshtari, M. and Mortezaie, H. (2012). "Performance improvement of tall reinforced concrete structures with Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers (MTMD)", Proceedings of 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
  42. Shooshtari, M. and Mortezaie, H. (2017), "Effect of using linear multiple tuned mass dampers on concrete structures with hysteresis behavior", J. Vibroeng., 19(2), 1158-1172. https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2016.17487.
  43. Soneji, B. and Jangid, R. (2008), "Influence of soil-structure interaction on the response of seismically isolated cable-stayed bridge", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 28(4), 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.06.005.
  44. Takewaki, I. (2000), "Soil-structure random response reduction via TMD-VD simultaneous use", Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 190(5), 677-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00434-X.
  45. Veletsos, A.S. and Verbic, B. (1973), "Vibration of viscoelastic foundations", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 2(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290020108.
  46. Wang, J.F. and Lin, C.C. (2005), "Seismic performance of multiple tuned mass dampers for soil-irregular building interaction systems", Int. J. Solid. Struct., 42(20), 5536-5554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.02.042.
  47. Wolf, J.P. and Deeks, A.J. (2004), Foundation Vibration Analysis: A Strength of Materials Approach, Butterworth-Heinemann
  48. Wu, J., Chen, G. and Lou, M. (1999), "Seismic effectiveness of tuned mass dampers considering soil-structure interaction", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28(11), 1219-1233. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28:11<1219::AID-EQE861>3.0.CO;2-G.
  49. Xu, L., Yu, Y. and Cui, Y. (2018), "Active vibration control for seismic excited building structures under actuator saturation, measurement stochastic noise and quantisation", Eng. Struct., 156, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.021.
  50. Xu, Y. and Kwok, K. (1992), "Wind-induced response of soil-structure-damper systems", J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn., 43(1), 2057-2068. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90632-K.
  51. Yan, G., Chen, F. and Wu, Y. (2016), "A semi-active H∞ control strategy with application to the vibration suppression of nonlinear high-rise building under earthquake excitations", Springer Plus, 5(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2635-1.
  52. Yanik, A., Aldemir, U. and Bakioglu, M. (2014), "A new active control performance index for vibration control of three-dimensional structures", Eng. Struct., 62, 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.009.
  53. Zadeh, L.A. (1965), "Fuzzy sets", Inform. Control, 8(3), 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
  54. Zhang, Y., Pan, P., Gu, Q., Yang, J. and Deng, K. (2014), "Development of Collaborative Structure Analysis (CSA) system and its application to investigate effects of soil-structure interaction", J. Earthq. Eng., 18(7), 1151-1169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2014.946162.