DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

소프트웨어 사교육의 양극화 현상 분석

Analysis of Polarization in Software Private Education

  • 투고 : 2021.10.31
  • 심사 : 2021.12.07
  • 발행 : 2021.12.31

초록

본 연구에서는 가구의 월평균 전체 사교육비와 소프트웨어 및 인공지능 관련 사교육비, 그리고 학업성취 간 관계를 분석하여 소프트웨어 교육의 양극화 실태를 조명하였다. 이를 위해 전국의 초등학생 자녀를 둔 학부모 2,780명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여 자료를 수집하였으며 상관분석과 차이검증을 수행하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 소프트웨어 교육 참여 여부에 따라 자녀의 학업성취도에는 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 나타났다. 둘째, 자녀의 학업성취도가 높을수록 소프트웨어 사교육에 참여하는 비율도 현격히 증가하는 경향성을 확인하였다. 셋째, 총 사교육비와 소프트웨어 관련 사교육비는 유의미한 정적 상관이 있었다. 넷째, 소프트웨어 사교육비와 학업성취도 간에는 통계적으로 유의미하지는 않았으나 정적 상관이 존재하는 것으로 드러났다. 본 연구를 통하여 학부모는 공교육에서 제공하는 소프트웨어 교육이 충분하지 않은 탓에 사교육 참여와 그 지출 규모를 늘리고 있고, 가구소득에 따라 미래 인재로 성장하기 위한 주요 역량을 키우는 데에 격차가 존재한다는 문제가 있음을 확인하였다.

This study analyzed the polarization of software education by analyzing the relationship between the average monthly total private education expenditure, software education expenditure, and academic achievement. For this purpose, data were collected and analyzed by surveying 2,780 parents of elementary school children nationwide. The results of this study are as follows: First, there was a statistically significant difference in children's academic achievement depending on whether or not they participated in software education. Second, the higher the children's academic achievement, the higher the percentage of participation in software private education expenditure. Third, there was a significant positive correlation between total private education expenditure and software-related private education expenditure. Fourth, although not statistically significant, there was a positive correlation between software private education expenses and academic achievement. In this study, software education provided by public education is not sufficient. For this reason, participation in private education and the amount of expenditure are increasing, and there is a gap in improving the main competencies of students according to household income.

키워드

과제정보

본 논문은 한국정보교육학회의 연구비 지원을 받아 수행된 연구 결과의 일부임.

참고문헌

  1. etnews(2018). https://m.etnews.com/20180315000301, 2018.03.15.
  2. Hankookilbo(2021). https://www.hankookilbo.com/News/Read/A2021031818590001744, 2021.03.22.
  3. Jeon, H.R., Shim, J.H.(2018). The longitudinal effect of academic achievement on participation in shadow education among middle-and high-school students. The Journal of Korea Education, 45(3), 61-91.
  4. Kim, D. Y., Park M.H.(2020). An analysis of the research trends of private tutoring in Korea. Journal of Educational Studies, 51(1), 1-27.
  5. Kim, Y.S.(2021). The Effect of the Parent's Economic Capital on the English Language Learner's Social Capital and Achievement in the Middle School. Journal of P ractical Engineering Education, 13(1), 1-18.
  6. Kim, K.S.(2021). A survey of gifted parents' perception of information subject. Journal of the Korean Association of information Education, 25(1), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2021.25.1.49
  7. Korean Educational Development Institute (2012). The effect of after school programs on reducing private education expenditure (2012 Position Paper, 9(20-10)). Seoul, Korea: Korean Educational Development Institute.
  8. Lee, J.H.(2021). Elementary school information education plan for nurturing SW and AI talent. Communications of the Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers, 39(9), 8-21.
  9. Lee, J.H. Kim, K.S., Kim. C.W., Kim, J.H., Kim, H.R, Ma, D.S., Park, S.J., Sohn, W.S., Ahn, S.H., Hur, K., Shim, J.K.(2021). Analysis of Elementary School Parents' Motivation for Participation in Private Software Education. Journal of The Korean Association of information Education, 25(2), 239-247. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2021.25.2.239
  10. Lee, N.S., Rew, K.H.(2018). The Future of Artificial Intelligence and Gifted Education: Study on Enhancing English Proficiency in Coding to Expand and Develop Gifted Education for Computer Science. The Journal of the Korean Society for Gifted and Talented, 16(4), 79-109.
  11. Lee, S.L., Han, Y.S.(2018). The Impact of Private Educational Expenditure on Children's Academic Performance: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Parenting Style. Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(4). 119-138. https://doi.org/10.35736/jcs.29.4.6
  12. Lee, Y.J., Kim, J.K.(2019). A Longitudinal Study on the Effects of Private Education on Academic Achievement : The Mediating Role of Fixed Mindset. Journal of Education & Culture, 25(1), 5-25.
  13. Ministry of Education(2021). Education Basic Statistics for 2021
  14. Paik, I.W.(2007). Education Economics. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  15. Park, H.J., Sang, K.A., Kang, J.Y.(2008). Effect of Private Tutoring on Middle School Students' Achievement, Journal of Educational Evaluation, 21(4), 107-127.
  16. Statistics Korea(2020). Interim results of the 2019 nationwide business survey, 2020.12.29.
  17. Statistics Korea(2021). 2020 Private Education Expense Survey Results.
  18. Yang, J.H., Han H.J(2018). Longitudinal Analysis of Private Tutoring Expenditure in KLIPS Using A Polarization Index and Gini Coefficient. Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 20(6), 3139-3153. https://doi.org/10.37727/jkdas.2018.20.6.3139
  19. Yeo, H.D., Kang, H.K.(2020). A Study on the Methodology for AI Gifted Education in the Era of AI - Focused on AI+ST Learning Method. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 30(2), 89-111. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2020.30.2.89
  20. Yoo, J.B., Kang, M.S.(2020). A Study on Teachers' Perceptions on the Problems and their Solution of Reducing Private Tutoring. Journal of Education & Culture, 26(3), 163-189. https://doi.org/10.24159/JOEC.2020.26.3.163