Journal of Convergence for Information Technology (융합정보논문지)

Convergence Society for SMB (중소기업융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Patent Dispute Countermeasures of Chinese Companies

중국 기업의 특허분쟁 대응 방안에 대한 연구

  • Park, Eun-Mi (School of Business Administration, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Shim, Yun-Soo (School of Business Administration, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Seo, Joung-Hae (School of Business Administration, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2020.12.16
  • Accepted : 2021.01.20
  • Published : 2021.01.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this research, we would like to understand the measures to be taken in the event of a patent dispute by Chinese companies that are growing rapidly and competing with Korean companies in the global market, at a time when the fusion and compounding technology are accelerating. For this reason, the patent dispute countermeasures shown in the previous research were derived through deep interviews with experts, and a questionnaire survey was conducted with patent practitioners of Chinese companies. As a result of the analysis, the importance of cross licensing, patent invalidation proceedings, proceedings through collaboration with other companies, royalty payments, and patent invalidation proceedings in the case of a patent dispute in the Chinese industry is high. Shown. The results of this study provide practical guidelines to help corporate patent practitioners understand the best course of action in the event of a patent dispute, respond in a timely manner, and save time and money. It seems that it can be done.

본 연구는 기술의 융복합화가 가속화되고 있는 시점에서 최근 급성장하고 있으며, 세계시장에서 우리기업과 경쟁관계에 있는 중국 기업들의 특허분쟁 발생시 대응방안에 대해 파악하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 선행연구에서 제시된 특허분쟁 대응 방안을 전문가 심층 인터뷰를 통해 도출하고, 중국 기업의 특허담당 실무자에게 설문조사를 실시하였다. 분석결과, 중국 산업에서 특허 분쟁 발생시에 취하는 대응 방안으로는 cross licensing, 특허무효화 소송, 타회사와의 연대를 통한 소송, 로열티 지급, 특허 무효 소송 순으로 그 중요도가 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 특허 분쟁 발생시 기업의 특허담당 실무자들에게 가장 알맞은 대응 방안을 파악하여 적시에 대응을 하여 시간과 비용을 줄일 수 있도록 실무적인 가이드라인을 제공할 수 있을 것으로 보인다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. T. Park, J. R. Jung & C. Liu. (2020). A study on policy measure for knowledge-based management in ICT companies: focused on appropriability mechanisms. Information Technology and Management, 21(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-019-00298-w
  2. Y. K. Kim & S. T. Park. (2018). Impacts of innovation motives and activities on innovation Performance. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 9(8), 585-591. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2018.00796.9
  3. S. T. Park, D. Y. , Kim & G. Li, (2020). An analysis of environmental big data through the establishment of emotional classification system model based on machine learning: focus on multimedia contents for portal applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 1-19. DOI : 10.1007/s11042-020-08818-5
  4. S. T. Park, Li, G., & J. C. Hong, (2020). A study on smart factory-based ambient intelligence context-aware intrusion detection system using machine learning. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(4), 1405-1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0998-6
  5. S. T.Park, E. M. Park, & Y. K. Kim, (2014). Does the Company Size Affect the Purpose of Patent Application?: Case of the Korean Electronics Industry. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 9(21), 8955-8966.
  6. D. H. Lim, B, N, Yun E. M. Park & S. T. Kim, (2015). A Study of Patent Acquisition and Resolution Strategies on Patent Disputes. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(21), 1.
  7. S. Y. Kim, S. T. Park & Y. K. Kim. (2015). Samsung-Apple patent war case analysis: focus on the strategy to deal with patent litigation. Journal of digital convergence, 13(3), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.3.117
  8. S. H. Yun. (2018.06.28). Samsung vs Apple closes patent litigation, http://m.ddaily.co.kr/m/m_article/?no=170156
  9. H. J. Yoo. (2020.09.18). Sisvel filed a patent lawsuit against Xiaomi in Europe, https://zdnet.co.kr/view/?no=20200918081247&from=pc
  10. S. T. Park & Y. K. Kim. (2014). Difference across indutries of innovation appropriability mechanism's effectiveness and classification. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(6), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.6.135
  11. Y. K. Kim, S. T. Park & S. J. Lee. (2009). A study on valuation factors of patent. Journal of Digital Convergence, 7(2), 63-70.
  12. S. T. Park, S. Y. Kim, S. J. Lee & Y. K. Kim. (2014). Patent activities and measures to deal with patent disputes, KMIS Conference. 561-563.
  13. Y. K. Kim, S. T. Park & S. J. Lee. (2010). Patent Valuation for Fair Royalty Distribution in Patent Pool. Journal of Digital Convergence, 8(1), 41-53.
  14. S. J. Lee, S. T. Park & Y. K. Kim. (2013). Appropriability mechanism strategy for domestic IT manufacturing companies. Journal of Digital Convergence, 11(11), 233-242. DOI : 10.14400/JDPM.2013.11.11.233
  15. S. T, Park, Y. K. Kim & T. U. Kim. (2013). A study on influencing factors of patent activities on management performance. Entrue Journal of Information Technology, 12(3), 121-129.
  16. J. O. Lanjouw & M. Schankerman. (2001). Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition. RAND journal of economics, 129-151. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696401
  17. J. Lerner. (1995). Patenting in the Shadow of Competitors. The Journal of Law and Economics, 38(2), 463-495. https://doi.org/10.1086/467339