DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

교량 유지관리 프로그램과 보수보강 공법에 대한 국가 간 비교 연구: 미국, 영국, 일본, 한국을 중심으로

Comparative Study of Bridge Maintenance: United States, United Kingdom, Japan, and Korea

  • 정유석 (경북대학교 건설방재공학부) ;
  • 민근형 (충남대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 이일근 (한국도로공사 도로교통연구원 구조물연구실) ;
  • 윤일로 (경북대학교 건설방재공학부) ;
  • 김우석 (충남대학교 토목공학과)
  • 투고 : 2021.08.25
  • 심사 : 2021.09.27
  • 발행 : 2021.10.30

초록

본 논문은 국내·외 (미국, 영국, 일본, 한국)의 교량유지관리활동을 비교하였다. 교량은 물류 및 교통망에 있어 매우 중요한 역할을 하고 있다. 제한된 예산으로 시민에게 적절한 수준의 서비스를 제공하기 위해서는 효율적인 교량 유지관리 활동 (예, 점검 및 보수·보강)이 이루어져야만 한다. 1980년대 후반 급속한 경제 성장은 국내 사회기반 시설 증가로 이어졌고 교량의 개소수 또한 급속도로 증가 하게 하였다. 교량 증가와 함께 노후화 또한 최근 빠르게 진행되고 있으며 이러한 교량 노후화 속도는 교량 유지관리를 담당하고 있는 관리주체에게는 상당한 부담이 되고 있다. 다행이 이러한 과정을 이미 경험하고 있는 해외국가의 체계적이고 종합적인 교량 유지관리 체계는 국내 유지관리 체계에 상당한 시사점을 줄 수 있을 것이라 판단하다. 따라서, 본 연구의 목적은 교량유지관리 선진국 (예, 미국, 영국, 일본)에서 시행되고 있는 교량 유지관리활동을 비교 분석하여 국내 유지관리에 시사하는 점을 분석하였다.

This paper compared bridge maintenance in United Stated, United Kingdom, Japan, and Korea. Bridges play an essential role in transportation network and in the economic production process. To provide a desirable level of service to the public within limited budgets, it is required to provide effective bridge maintenance activities (e.g. inspection and repair/rehabilitation) at acceptable level of bridge service. A number of bridges are expected to age rapidly in Korea, which will be the excess burden of government. Since several countries have experienced a number of deteriorated bridges because of aging, the countries aforementioned in this study have already developed comprehensive bridge maintenance programs such as inspection practice and repair/rehabilitation techniques. Therefore, the goal of this paper is to synthesize and to compare useful knowledge on bridge maintenance and bridge crack repair/restoration of deteriorated concrete bridge in the four countries. Finally, recommendations that will serve as guidance to transportation agencies for potential enhancements to bridge maintenance and bridge repairs are presented.

키워드

과제정보

이 성과는 정부(과학기술정보통신부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(No. 2020R1C1C1014370).

참고문헌

  1. AASHTO (2019), Manual for Bridge Element Inspection, American Association of State Highway Officials, Washington DC, U.S.
  2. ACI (2006), ACI 546.3R-06 Guide for the Selection of Materials for the Repair of Concrete, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, U.S.
  3. ACI (2013), ACI 562M-13 Code Requirements for Evaluation, Repair, and Rehabilitation of Concrete Buildings and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, U.S.
  4. ACI (2014), ACI 546R-14 Guide to concrete repair, American Concrete Institute, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, U.S.
  5. ASCE (2021), Report card for american's infrastructure-Bridge, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, U.S.
  6. ATKINS (2002), CSS Bridge Condition Indicators, Volume 3: Evaluation of Condition Indicators, County Surveyors' Society, Lincoln, England.
  7. BS (2005), EN-1504 Products and Systems for the Protection and Repair of Concrete Structures-Definitions, Requirements, Quality Control and Evaluation of Conformity, British Standards, London, England.
  8. Kennedy, C., 2020 (2020), 4,000 of UK's Busiest Road Bridges are in 'poor' Condition, New Civil Engineer. https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/4000-of-uks-busiest-road-bridges-are-in-poor-condition-04-12-2020/
  9. FHWA (1995), Recording and Coding Guide for the Structure Inventory and Appraisal of the Nation's Bridge, Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC, U.S.
  10. FHWA (2012), Bridge Inspector's Reference Manual, Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC, U.S.
  11. Highways England (2021(a)), CS450 Inspection of Highway Structures, Highways England, Birmingham, England.
  12. Highways England (2021(b)), CS454 Assessment of Highway Brides and Structures, Highways England, Birmingham, England.
  13. ICRI (2013), Concrete Repair Manual 4th edition, 2013, International Concrete Repair Institute, Minnesota, U.S.
  14. Jeong, Y., Kim, W., Lee, I., and Lee, J. (2016), Bridge Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Preventive Maintenance, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 20(6), 1-9 https://doi.org/10.11112/JKSMI.2016.20.6.001
  15. KEC (2016), Development of Maintenance Index for the Bridge Service Life to 100 years, Korea Expressway Corporation, Gimcheon, South Korea.
  16. KEC (2019), Guide for Maintenance of Expressway Bridges, Korea Expressway Corporation, Gimcheon, South Korea.
  17. KEC (2020), Performance Investigation and Improvement Measures for Concrete Section Restoration Work. Korea Expressway Corporation, Gimcheon, South Korea.
  18. KISTEC (2012), Guide for Repair and Rehabilitation of Structure (bridge and tunnel), Korea Infrastructure Safety and Technology Corporation, Jinju, South Korea.
  19. KOSIS (2021), Status of the Nation's Bridges and Tunnels in Republic of Korea, Korea Statistical Information Service, Sejong, South Korea.
  20. KS (2012), KS F 4042, Polymer Modified Cement Mortar for Maintenance in Concrete Structure, Korean Standards & Certifications, Eumseong, South Korea.
  21. KS (2021), KS F 4923, Epoxy Adhesives for Repairing in Concrete Structure, Korean Standards & Certifications, Eumseong, South Korea.
  22. MLIT (2013), White Paper on Land, Infrastructure, Transportation, and Tourism in Japan, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transportation, and Tourism, Tokyo, Japan.
  23. MLIT (2014), Manual for Bridge Periodic Inspection, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transportation, and Tourism, Tokyo, Japan.
  24. MOLIT (2012), Guideline and Commentary of Safety Inspection and In-depth Safety Inspection for Structures-Bridge. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Sejong, South Korea.
  25. PWRI (2014), Manual for repair and rehabilitation of concrete Structure, Public Works Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan.