DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ratio of Elemental Carbon Concentrations for Respective Measurement Locations according to the Sampler

샘플러에 따른 측정 위치별 원소탄소의 농도 비율

  • Cha, Won-Seok (Institute of Occupation Environment, Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service) ;
  • Kim, Eun-Young (Institute of Occupation Environment, Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service) ;
  • Choi, Sung-Won (Institute of Occupation Environment, Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service) ;
  • Choi, Soo-Yeon (Institute of Occupation Environment, Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service)
  • 차원석 (근로복지공단 직업환경연구원) ;
  • 김은영 (근로복지공단 직업환경연구원) ;
  • 최성원 (근로복지공단 직업환경연구원) ;
  • 최수연 (근로복지공단 직업환경연구원)
  • Received : 2021.10.27
  • Accepted : 2021.12.20
  • Published : 2021.12.30

Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted to determine the differences in EC concentrations according to the type of sampler by measuring and analyzing EC. Methods: Elemental carbon was measured in diesel engine vehicles and at the roadside. Using NIOSH method 5040, a cassette was coupled to 37 mm and 27 mm quartz filters and measurements were performed 21 times. There were 14 types of measurement methods, and polystyrene, polypropylene, and metal samplers were evenly placed inside the movable chamber. Results: The results measured using the 37 mm conductive cassette (closed/open) and the IOM sampler made of conductive materials showed a higher ratio than the other results. When the 37 mm conductive cassette was measured with the lid open, it showed a statistically significantly higher ratio than with other measurement methods (p<0.05). Conclusions: Checking the EC concentration a total of 21 times at each ratio based on the concentration of the 3-stage polystyrene cassette, it was statistically significantly higher when the 37 mm conductive cassette was open. This same cassette also showed a slightly higher EC concentration when closed. It was ascertained that some DEE was collected on the cassette wall surface due to the electrical conductivity of the polystyrene cassette, resulting in sample loss. Since EC is composed of fine particles, it is thought that electrical conductivity may affect its concentration.

Keywords

References

  1. Baron PA, Chen CC, Hemenway DR, O'Shaughnessy P. Non uniform air flow in inlets: the effect on filter deposits in the fiber sampling cassette. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1994;55(8):722-732(https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.011)
  2. Baron PA. Personal aerosol sampler design: a review. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1998;13(5):313-320 (https://doi.org/10.1080/1047322X.1998.10390088)
  3. Baron PA. Factors affecting aerosol sampling. NIOSH. Manual of Analytical Methods, 4th ed., third supplement 2003;184:207 Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/chaps.html
  4. Birch ME, Cary RA. Elemental carbon-based method for monitoring occupational exposures to particulate diesel exhaust. Aerosol Science and Technology 1996;25(3):221-241(https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829608965393)
  5. Blackford DB, Harris GW, Revell G. The reduction of dust losses within the cassette of the SIMPEDS personal dust sampler. Ann Occup Hyg 1985;29(2):169-180 (https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/29.2.169)
  6. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA). Health assessment document for diesel engine exhaust. Washington, DC; U.S. EPA, EPA/600/8-90/057F;2002 Available from: https://www.atfis.or.kr/article/M001040000/view.do?articleId=1739&boardId=3&page=3&searchKey=&searchString=&searchCategory=
  7. Groves J, Cain JR. A survey of exposure to diesel engine exhaust emissions in the workplace. Ann occup Hyg 2000;44(6):435-447 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4878(00)00002-8
  8. Ham SH, Kim SH, Lee JH, Lee NR, Yoon CS. Effect of sampling cassettes type used in sampling of airborne carbon nanotube(CNT) to electrostatic loss. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 2017;27(3):180-186(https://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2017.27.3.180)
  9. Harrison RM, Tilling R, Romero MSC, Harrad S, Jarvis K. A study of trace metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the roadside environment. Atmos Environ 2003;37(17):2391-2402(https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00122-5)
  10. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2012. Press release No.213, IARC Diesel engine exhaust carcinogenic. Available from: http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2012/pdfs/pr213_E.pdf [accessed April 1, 2015]
  11. Jang JY, Kim SW. Evaluation of filtration performance efficiency of commercial cloth masks. J Environ Health Sci 2015;41(3):203-15(https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2015.41.3.203)
  12. KCDC (Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), Diesel engine exhaust. 2015
  13. Kim MC, Kwon SB, Lee KW, Kim JC, Jung IR, Ryu JH, Eom MD. Submicrometer particle size distribution of emissions from diesel engines. Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment 1999;15(5):657-665
  14. Kim SI, Park JY, Lee KM, Kim SW. A study on exposure indices for diesel engine exhaust in forklift operating areas. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 2016:26(1);38-47 https://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2016.26.1.38
  15. Liu BY, Pui DY, Rubow KL, Szymanski WW. Electrostatic effects in aerosol sampling and filtration. Ann Occup Hyg 1985;29(2):251-269(https://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2016.26.1.38)
  16. MoE (Ministry of Environment). Maintenance and inspection method to reduce smoke. 1999
  17. NIOSH (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health). Asbestos and other fibers by PCM 7400. NMAM(NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods); 1994a Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/7400.pdf
  18. NIOSH (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health). Particulates not otherwise regulated, total 0500. NMAM(NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods); 1994b Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/0500.pdf
  19. NIOSH (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health). Diesel particulate metter(as elemental carbon) 5040. NMAM(NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods); 2003 Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/pdfs/5040.pdf
  20. NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research). Understanding the theory and reduction principle of particulate matter in diesel vehicles. 2013
  21. Puskar MA, Harkins JM, Moomey JD, Hecker LH. Internal wall losses of pharmaceutical ducts during closed-face, 37-mm polystyrene cassette sampling. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1991;52(7):280-286(https://doi.org/10.1080/15298669191364730)
  22. Ris C. U.S. EPA Health assessment for diesel engine exhaust: a review. Inhal Toxicol 2007;19(1):229-239 (https://doi.org/10.1080/08958370701497960)
  23. SUVA. Grenzwerte am Arbeitsplatz: MAK-/BATWerte (Erlauterungen), physikalische Einwirkungen, physische Belastungen. 2014
  24. Taiwo AM. Source apportionment of urban background particulate matter in birmingham, united kingdom using a mass closure model. Aerosol Air Qual Res 2016; 16(5):1244-1252(https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2015.09.0537)