Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Exploring Digital Information Service Method through Analysis of PISA 2018 Reading Literacy Assessment Framework

PISA 2018 독서 리터러시 평가틀 분석을 통한 디지털 정보 서비스 방안 탐색

  • Park, Juhyeon ;
  • Ranasinghe, W.M. Tharanga Dilruk (University of Kelaniya)
  • 박주현 (전남대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • Received : 2021.01.21
  • Accepted : 2021.02.10
  • Published : 2021.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to derive the implications needed to improve reading and information literacy and provide information services for students and citizens through changes in the concept of PISA 2018 Reading Literacy and its Assessment Framework analysis. The findings of the study are as follows. First, meaning of PISA Reading Literacy concept has changed along with the changes of the social and technological environments. Second, concept and assessment framework included the whole process of reading. Third, the Assessment Framework included a number of factors similar to the cognitive process of the information literacy model like Big6 Skills, but also there were differences. Fourth, the digital reading is reflected in the Assessment Framework. The PISA 2018 Reading Literacy Assessment Framework provides implications for the standards and methods required for librarians to develop reading and information literacy models and assessment frameworks to improve citizens' reading and information literacy, and to provide information services to them.

본 연구의 목적은 PISA 2018 독서 리터러시 개념의 변화를 살펴보고 독서 리터러시 평가틀의 구성요인을 분석하여 학생과 시민들의 독서와 정보 리터러시 향상 및 정보 서비스 제공에 필요한 시사점을 도출하는 데 있다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, PISA의 독서 리터러시의 개념은 사회적 기술적 환경에 따라 변화되어 왔다. 둘째, PISA 독서 리터러시 개념과 평가틀에는 독서 전중후의 전 과정이 포함되어 있었다. 셋째, 평가틀은 Big6 Skills와 같은 정보 리터러시 모형의 인지적 과정과 유사한 요인을 다수 포함하였으나 차이점도 있었다. 넷째, 평가틀에는 디지털 독서가 반영되었다. PISA 2018 독서 리터러시 평가틀은 사서가 시민들의 독서와 정보 리터러시 향상을 위하여 독서나 정보 리터러시 모형과 평가틀을 개발하고 시민들에게 정보 서비스를 제공하는 데 필요한 기준과 방법에 대한 시사점을 제공해주고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ku, Jaok et al. 2016. OECD Programme for International Student Assessment: Establishing a foundation of PISA 2018 Field Trial. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation
  2. Kwon, Eun-Kyung. 2012. "Reading Education at School Libraries: New Considerations Based on the Analysis of Students' Attitudes Toward Reading and their Reading Achievements." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(4): 249-269. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.4.201212.249
  3. Kim, Nam Hee. 2012. "PISA Reading Literacy and 21C Korean Competence." Korean Language Education, 138: 41-71.
  4. Kim, SooKyoung et al. 2018. "A Study on the Curriculum Development for the Training of Specialized Librarians in Reading Guidance." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(4): 187-218. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.49.4.201812.187
  5. Naju Public Library. 2020. Jeollanam-do Office of Education's electronic library utilization rate is up 268% compared to the previous year. [online] [cited 2020. 12. 28.]
  6. Noh, Younghee. 2016. "A Study on Librarians' Perception about the Changing Role of University Libraries." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 33(2): 227-256. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.2.227
  7. Park, Ju-Hyeon and Chang, Woo-Kwon. 2014. "Analysis of PISA 2009 Impacts of School Library Level Variables on Academic Achievement." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(3): 331-351. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.331
  8. Park, Juhyeon. 2018a. "Study on the Development of Conceptualization Model for Reading, Information, ICT, and Digital Literacy." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(2): 267-300. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.49.2.201806.267
  9. Park, Ju-Hyeon. 2018b. "A Study on the Direction of Reading and Information Service through Analysis of Digital Reading and Information Literacy Competencies Evaluation Items: Focusing on PIAAC and PISA." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(3): 61-89.
  10. Bae, Kyung-Jae and Park, Hee-Jin. 2013. "A Study on the Current Condition and the Improvement of Digital Literacy Education." Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 44(2): 241-265. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.2.201306.241
  11. Song, Kyeong-Jin andCha, Mikyeong. 2014. "A Study on the Concept of Literacy in Library and Information Science and in Public Library Services." Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 48(4): 215-240.
  12. Lee, Kyeong-Hwa and Song, Gi-Ho. 2019. "An Analysis of Program Types for School Reading Education Included in the 100 Excellent Curriculum by Multiple Intelligences." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(1): 85-103. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.1.201903.85
  13. Lee, Byeong-Ki. 2012. "The comparative analysis of PISA reading domain and AASL standards for the 21st-century learner." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(3): 193-226. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.3.201209.193
  14. Lee, Yeon Ok. 2020. "Students' and Teachers' Perception on the Roles and Qualifications of Teacher Librarians based on the Semantic Network Analysis." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 51(3): 81-102. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.51.3.202009.81
  15. Lee, Yong Jae and Lee, Ji-Wook. 2019. "A Study on the Roles of Academic Library for Supporting Class and Learning Activities in Korea." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(4): 359-379. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.4.201912.359
  16. Lim, Hyoung-Yeon. 2011. "Role of Librarian in Child Education Programs of Public Library: Model Building and Assessment through Case Analysis." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(2): 51-68. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.2.201106.51
  17. Zhang, L. and Park, Juhyeon. 2019. "An Analysis on the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of the US - Focusing on the Contents of Library and Information Services." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(1): 357-380. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.1.201903.357
  18. Korean Publishing Research Institut. 2020. 2019 National Reading Survey. Sejong: Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism.
  19. Choi, Yoon Kyung and Chung, Yeon Kyoung. 2014. "A Study on Developing and Applying a Tool for Measuring Achievements of Reading Programs for Children." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(1): 7-29. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.1.007
  20. Pyo, Soon-Hee and Cha, MiKyeong. 2018. "A Comparative Study of the Perceptions on Public Libraries between Librarians and Users: A Survey of the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education Public Libraries." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(2): 221-244.
  21. National Information Society Agency. 2020. Internet Usage Survey of Korea 2019. Daegu: National Information Society Agency.
  22. Information Society Development Institute. 2019. Broadcasting Media Usage Survey in 2019. Gyeonggi: Korea Communications Commission.
  23. American Association of School Librarians. 2018. National School Library Standards for learners, School Librarians, and School Libraries. Chicago: ALA.
  24. Clark, C. 2014. Children's and Young People's Writing in 2013: Findings from the National Literacy Trust's Annual Literacy Survey. London: National Literacy Trust.
  25. Eisenberg, M. and Berkowitz, R. 1988. Curriculum initiative: an agenda and strategy for library media programs. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
  26. Leu, D. et al. 2013, "New Literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy instruction and assessment." [online] [cited 2020. 12. 8.]
  27. OECD. 2019a. PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing. [online] [cited 2020. 12. 11.]
  28. OECD. 2019b. PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. Paris: OECD Publishing. [online] [cited 2020. 12. 15.]
  29. Schleicher, A. 2019. PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  30. Tyner, K. 1998. Literacy in a Digital World: Teaching and Learning in the Age of Information. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
  31. UNESCO. 2014. Reading in the Mobile Era: A Study of Mobile Reading in Developing Countries. Paris: UNESCO.
  32. Werlich, E. 1976. A Text Grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle and Meyer.