DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

발달장애인의 도전적 행동에 대한 현황 및 사회복지사의 인식에 대한 연구: 경기도 장애인 거주시설을 중심으로

Current status of their behavioral behavior and perceptions of social workers: Focusing on residential facilities for the disabled in Gyeonggi-Do

  • 신준옥 (성결대학교 사회복지학과)
  • Shin, Jun-Ok (Department of Social Welfare, Sungkyul University)
  • 투고 : 2021.11.12
  • 심사 : 2021.12.20
  • 발행 : 2021.12.28

초록

본 연구는 경기도 장애인 거주시설에서 생활하는 발달장애인의 도전적 행동에 대한 현황 파악과 거주시설 사회복지사가 도전적 행동에 대해서 얼마나 인식하는지 파악하고자 하였다. 연구방법은 경기도 장애인 거주시설 사회복지사 145명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 수집된 자료는 SPSS 25.0을 이용하여 빈도, 백분율, 평균, 표준편차 등으로 산출하였다. 연구 결과 첫째, 발달장애인의 도전적 행동과 관련된 현황은 신체적 상해 경험이 가장 많은 것으로 분석되었다. 둘째, 도전적 행동에 대한 사회복지사의 인식으로는 심리적 트라우마로 인하여 업무에 지장을 받고, 이직을 고려한 적이 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 이러한 결과를 토대로 발달장애인의 도전적 행동에 대한 정보공유, 교육, 대처능력, 상해를 예방하며 발달장애인과 사회복지사가 심리적 안정을 취할 수 있도록 공간 마련을 위한 실천적 제언점을 제시하였다. 향후 연구에서는 보호자가 인식하는 도전적 행동에 대한 연구가 필요하다.

The purpose of this study was to identify the current status of the challenging behaviors of the developmentally disabled living in residential facilities for the disabled in Gyeonggi-do and whether social workers in residential facilities recognize the challenging behaviors, and then to draw implications for establishing an intervention for the challenging behaviors. As a research method, a survey was conducted targeting 145 social workers in residential facilities for the disabled in Gyeonggi-do. The collected data were calculated as frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation using SPSS 25.0. As a result of the study, first, it was analyzed that the status of injuries related to challenging behaviors of persons with developmental disabilities was high. Second, it was analyzed that the social worker's perception of the challenging behavior of the developmentally disabled is that they are considering job change because of psychological trauma. The coping ability and ability to cope with it were excellent, and they did not achieve excellent results. Learn more about acting in a professional manner.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. M. O. Kim. & G. E. Kim. (2017). Issues and Prospects for Supporting Challenging Behaviors of People with Developmental Disabilities, Critical Social Policy, 56, 59-94.
  2. E. E. Kiernan. & C. Alborz. (2001). The prevalence fo challenging behaviors: a total population study. Res. Dev. Disabil, 22(1), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-4222(00)00061-5
  3. S. Mills. & J. Rose. (2011). The relationship between challenging behaviour, burnout and cognitive variables in staff working with people who have intellectual disabilities, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55(9): 844-857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01438.x
  4. H. Y. Lim. & Y. J. Hong. & J. R. Jeon. (2019). A study on the perceptions of persons with disabilities in communal living households on sexual behaviors of persons with developmental disabilities. Korea Contents Association, 10(6), 5-10.
  5. Seoul National Hospital. (2015). Investigation of the current status of domestic and foreign treatment and unmet needs. Seoul: Seoul National Hospital.
  6. K.. O. Park. & D. S. Lee. & E. S. Lee. (2017). A Study on Workers' Perceptions on Challenging Behaviors with Developmental Disabilities: Focusing on Workers in Residential Facilities for the Disabled, Korean Welfare of the Disabled 35, 151-176.
  7. F. Brown & C. A. Michaele. & C. M. Olivia. S. B. Wollf. (2008) Personal Paradigm shifts among ABA and PBS experts, J. of Positive Behavioral Interventions, Vol.10, 4, 212-227 https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300708318797
  8. P. S. Starian. & M. L. Hemmeter. (2005) Keys to Being successful: When Confronted with Challenging Behaviors, Young Exceptional Children Monograph Series 1, 17-27.
  9. C. M. Petri. & M. Z. Linda. & G. Linda. & T. B. Anna. (2019). Evaluating a staff training program on the interaction between staff and people with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour: An observational study. J. of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 2(44), 131-138.
  10. E. E. Bromley. (1995). The form and function of challenging behaviors. J ournal of Intellectual Disability Research, 39, 388-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.1995.tb00543.x
  11. S. Mills. & J. Rose. (2011). The relationship between challenging behavior, burnout and cognitive variables in staff working with people who have intellectual disabilities. J ournal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55(9), 844-857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01438.x
  12. M. C. Chung. & C. Harding. (2009). Investigating burnout and psychological well-being of staff working with people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22, 549-60 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2009.00507.x
  13. J. M. Hensel. & Y. Lunsky. & C. S. Dewa, (2012). Exposure to client aggression and burnout among community staff who support adults with intellectual disabilities in Ontario, Canada. J ournal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(9), 910-915. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01493.x
  14. M. C. Chung. & S. C. Bickerton. & W. L. Winchester. (2003). The prevalence of challenging behavior in hospital. Family and Community Residential Settings, 17, 5-15
  15. Y. D. Kim &. G. E. Kim. (2011). Lowest service for disabled people Semi-Applied Manual 5: Physical Intervention. Korea Association of Welfare Facilities for the Disabled, Sungkonghoe University Recovery Institute.
  16. C. Goble. (1999). Like the secret service isn't it. people with leaming difficulties'perceptions of staff and services mystification and disempowerment, Disability and Society, 14(4), 449-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599926064