디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제19권11호
  • /
  • Pages.287-300
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

디지털로 전환된 서비스의 지각된 상호작용이 기술수용의도에 미치는 영향

Effects of Perceived Interactions of Digital Transformed Services on Intention to Accept Technology

  • 이동엽 (금오공과대학교 컨설팅학과) ;
  • 김귀곤 (금오공과대학교 경영학과)
  • Lee, Dong-Yub (Department Consulting, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Kim, Gwi-Gon (Dept. of Business Administration, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2021.10.22
  • 심사 : 2021.11.20
  • 발행 : 2021.11.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 기술발전과 비대면서비스의 증가에 의해 전통적인 서비스가 디지털서비스로 전환되고 있으므로, 디지털로 전환된 서비스가 수용자의 사용의도에 미치는 영향관계를 검증하는 데 있다. 연구는 프로그램 개발 절차와 프로그램 효과성 검증 절차로 이루어졌고, 다중회귀분석과 함께 조절된 매개효과를 검증하기 위해 Bootstrapping을 실시하였다. 연구대상은 국내에 거주하는 대학(원)생과 일반인 323명을 대상으로 진행되었다. 연구결과. 첫째, 디지털로 전환된 서비스의 지각된 상호작용 세 요인(지각된 커뮤니케이션, 지각된 제어, 지각된 반응성)은 지각된 유용성과 지각된 사용용이성에 각각 긍정적인 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 기술수용의도의 영향관계를 검증하였다. 셋째, 디지털로 전환된 서비스의 지각된 상호작용 세 요인이 사용의도에 미치는 영향은 지각된 유용성과 지각된 사용용이성에 의해 매개됨을 확인할 수 있었다. 넷째, 디지털 격차에 의한 조절된 매개효과를 확인하였다. 그 결과, 디지털로 전환된 서비스의 지각된 상호작용 세 요인이 디지털로 전환된 서비스 사용의도의 중요한 요인임을 확인했고, 디지털격차에 의해 디지털전환 서비스에 대한 수용의도가 달라질 수 있으므로 국가과 기업차원의 디지털격차를 최소화하기 위한 노력이 필요함을 시사한다.

The purpose of this study is to verify the influence relationship of digitally converted services on consumers' intention to use since traditional services are being converted to digital services due to technological development and increase in non-face-to-face services. The study consisted of a program development procedure and a program effectiveness verification procedure, and bootstrapping was performed to verify the mediating effect adjusted along with multiple regression analysis. The subjects of this study were 323 university (graduate) students and the general public residing in Korea. Results. First, it was found that the three perceived interaction factors (perceived communication, perceived control, and perceived reactivity) of digital transformed services had a positive effect on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, respectively. Second, the relationship of influence of technology acceptance intention was verified. Third, it was confirmed that the effect of the three perceived interaction factors of digital transformed services on intention to use was mediated by perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Fourth, the mediating effect mediated by digital disparity was confirmed. As a result, it was confirmed that the three perceived interaction factors of the digitally converted service are important factors in the intention to use the digitally converted service. This suggests that efforts are needed to minimize the digital divide.

키워드

과제정보

이 연구는 금오공과대학교 학술연구비로 지원되었음(202002300001)

참고문헌

  1. Matzner, M. et al. (2018). Digital transformation in service management, Journal of Service Management Research, 2(2), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.15358/2511-8676-2018-2-3
  2. Andriushchenko, K. et al. (2020). Peculiarities of sustainable development of enterprises in the context of digital transformation. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 7(3), 2255-2270. DOI:10.1542. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(53)
  3. Berman, S. J., & Bell, R. (2011. Apr). Digital transformation: Creating new business models where digital meets physical. IBM Institute for Business Value, 1-17.
  4. Manyika J, et al. (2015) Digital America: A tale of the haves and have-mores. McKinsey Global Institute. 1-120.
  5. Bikse, V., Lusena-Ezera, I., Rivza, P., & Rivza, B. (2021). The Development of Digital Transformation and Relevant Competencies for Employees in the Context of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Latvia. Sustainability, 13(16), 9233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/cibmee.2019.073.
  6. Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
  7. Majchrzak A, Markus ML, Wareham J. Designing for digital transformation: Lessons for information systems research from the study of ICT and societal challenges. MIS quarterly. 2016 Jun;40(2):267-277. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2016/40:2.03
  8. Woxapp(2014). Digitalization Solutions Development. Woxapp(Online). https://woxapp.com/industries/digitalization-solutions-development
  9. Song, J. H., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2008). Determinants of perceived web site interactivity. Journal of marketing, 72(2), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.2.99
  10. Van Deursen, A. J., & Mossberger, K. (2018). Any thing for anyone? A new digital divide in internet-of-things skills. Policy & internet, 10(2), 122-140. DOI:10.1002/poi3.171.
  11. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
  12. Lombard, M., & Snyder-Duch, J. (2001). Interactive advertising and presence: A framework. Journal of interactive Advertising, 1(2), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2001.10722051
  13. Lu, D., Lai, I. K. W., & Liu, Y. (2019). The consumer acceptance of smart product-service systems in sharing economy: the effects of perceived interactivity and particularity. Sustainability, 11(3), 928. DOI:10.3390/su11030928.
  14. Wu, G. (1999, March). Perceived interactivity and attitude toward web sites. In Proceedings of the conference-American Academy of Advertising (pp. 254-262). American Academy of Advertising.
  15. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision sciences, 27(3), 451-481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x
  16. Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y. K. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47(2), 222-244. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.00.
  17. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly, 157-178.
  18. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  19. Scheerder, A., Van Deursen, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second-and third-level digital divide. Telematics and informatics, 34(8), 1607-1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007
  20. Van Dijk, J. A. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Sage Publications.
  21. Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. [Brochure]. New York. Simon and Schuster.
  22. Belanger, F., & Carter, L. (2009). The impact of the digital divide on e-government use. Communications of the ACM, 52(4), 132-135. https://doi.org/10.1145/1498765.1498801
  23. Chang, Y., Shahzeidi, M., Kim, H., & Park, M. C. (2012). Gender digital divide and online participation: A cross-national analysis. EconStor, 1-14.
  24. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach.