DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Spectral encapsulation of OFDM systems based on orthogonalization for short packet transmission

  • Kim, Myungsup (Department of Mathematical Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kwak, Do Young (Department of Mathematical Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Man (Department of Radio Communication Engineering, Korea Ocean and Maritime University) ;
  • Kim, Wan-Jin (Agency for Defense Development)
  • Received : 2019.06.25
  • Accepted : 2019.09.16
  • Published : 2020.12.14

Abstract

A spectrally encapsulated (SE) orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) precoding scheme for wireless short packet transmission, which can suppress the out-of-band emission (OoBE) while maintaining the advantage of the cyclic prefix (CP)-OFDM, is proposed. The SE-OFDM symbol consists of a prefix, an inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) symbol, and a suffix generated by the head, center, and tail matrices, respectively. The prefix and suffix play the roles of a guard interval and suppress the OoBE, and the IFFT symbol has the same size as the discrete Fourier transform symbol in the CP-OFDM symbol and serves as an information field. Specifically, as the center matrix generating the IFFT symbol is orthogonal, data and pilot symbols can be allocated to any subcarrier without distinction. Even if the proposed precoder is required to generate OFDM symbols with spectral efficiency in the transmitter, a corresponding decoder is not required in the receiver. The proposed scheme is compared with CP-OFDM in terms of spectrum, OoBE, and bit-error rate.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank Dr. Lim Jong Soo at ETRI for the helpful discussions and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

References

  1. D. Qu et al., Detection of non-contiguous OFDM symbols for cognitive radio systems without out-of-band spectrum synchronization, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 10 (2011), no. 2, 693-701. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2011.120810.101324
  2. A. Sahin, I. Güvenç, and H. Arslan, A survey on multicarrier communications: Prototype filters, lattice structures, and implementation aspects, IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. 16 (2014), no. 3, 1312-1338. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2013.121213.00263
  3. A. Sahin and H. Arslan, Edge windowing for OFDM based systems, IEEE Commun. Lett. 15 (2011), no. 11, 1208-1211. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2011.090611.111530
  4. C.-D. Chung, Spectral precoding for rectangularly pulsed OFDM, IEEE Trans. Commun. 56 (2008), no. 9, 1498-1510. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2008.060459
  5. C.-D. Chung and K.-W. Chen, Spectrally precoded OFDM without guard insertion, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 66 (2017), no.1, 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2016.2551322
  6. W.-C. Chen and C.-D. Chung, Spectrally efficient OFDM pilot waveform for channel estimation, IEEE Trans. Commun. 65 (2017), no. 1, 387-402. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2016.2616859
  7. M. Ma et al., Optimal orthogonal precoding for power leakage suppression in DFT-based systems, IEEE Trans. Commun. 59 (2011), 3, 387-402.
  8. J. van de Beek and F. Berggren, N-continuous OFDM, IEEE Commun. Lett. 13 (2009), no. 1, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2009.081446
  9. A. Tom, A. Sahin, and H. Arslan, Suppressing alignment: Joint PAPR and out-of-band power leakage reduction for OFDM-based systems, IEEE Trans. Commun. 64 (2016), 1100-1109. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2015.2512603
  10. B. Farhang-Boroujeny, OFDM versus filter bank multicarrier, IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 28 (2011), no. 3, 92-112. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2011.940267
  11. R. Datta et al., GFDM interference cancellation for flexible cognitive radio PHY design, in Proc. 76th IEEE VTC Fall (Québec City, Canada), Sept. 2012, pp. 1-5.
  12. J. Abdoli, M. Jia, and J. Ma, Filtered OFDM: A new waveform for future wireless systems, in IEEE Int. Workshop Signal Process. Adv. Wireless Commun. (Stockholm, Sweden), 2015, pp. 66-70.
  13. L. Diez et al., A generalized spectral shaping method for OFDM signals, IEEE Trans. Commun. 67 (2019), 3540-3551. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcomm.2019.2892750
  14. J. A. C. Bingham, RFI suppression in multicarrier transmission systems, in Proc. IEEE Global Telecommun. Conf. (London. UK), Aug. 1996, pp. 1026-1030.
  15. T. Weiss et al., Mutual interference in OFDM-based spectrum pooling systems, in Proc. IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf. (Milano, Italy), 2004, pp. 1873-1877.
  16. D. Qu, A. Wang, and T. Jiang, Extended active interference cancellation for sidelobe suppression in cognitive radio OFDM systems with cyclic prefix, IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech. 59 (2010), 1689-1695. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2010.2040848
  17. Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specification: Higher Speed Physical Layer (PHY) Extension in the 5GHz Band, IEEE Std. 802.11a/D5.0, Apr. 1999.
  18. Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specification, IEEE (802.11gTM-2003.).
  19. 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); User Equipment (UE) Radio Transmission and Reception (Release 8), 3GPPTS 36.101 V8.15.0 (1811-09).
  20. Specification Framework for TGax, IEEE 802.11-15/0132r15.
  21. J. K. Jeong et al., Eigendecomposition-based GFDM for interference-free data transmission and pilot insertion for channel estimation, IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 17 (2018), 6931-6943. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2018.2864995

Cited by

  1. Spectrally encapsulated OFDM: Vectorized structure with minimal complexity vol.43, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.2020-0307