수산해양기술연구 (Journal of the Korean Society of Fisheries and Ocean Technology)

  • 제56권4호
  • /
  • Pages.299-315
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2671-9940(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9924(eISSN)
한국수산해양기술학회 (The Korean Society of Fisheries and Ocean Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중서부태평양해역 다랑어어업의 생태계기반 어업 위험도 평가

Evaluation of Korean distant water tuna fisheries in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean using ecosystem-based fishery risk assessment

  • 권유정 (국립수산과학원 원양자원과) ;
  • 임정현 (국립수산과학원 원양자원과) ;
  • 이미경 (국립수산과학원 원양자원과) ;
  • 이성일 (국립수산과학원 원양자원과)
  • KWON, Youjung (Distant Water Fisheries Resources Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • LIM, Jung-hyun (Distant Water Fisheries Resources Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • LEE, Mi Kyung (Distant Water Fisheries Resources Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • LEE, Sung Il (Distant Water Fisheries Resources Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science)
  • 투고 : 2020.10.13
  • 심사 : 2020.11.20
  • 발행 : 2020.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Tuna fisheries were applied to an integrated ecosystem-based fishery risk assessment method using indexes of target species status, inhabited species in a target ecosystem, habitat quality and socio-economic benefit of affected fisheries. This study suggested more effective and efficient management measures to break away from traditional management methods, such as limitation of catch and fishing effort. The results presented that the objective risk index (ORIS) on sustainability of bigeye and yellowfin tunas by purse seine fishery was estimated high due to the high catch ratio of small fishes. The ORIs of biodiversity (ORIB) and habitat quality (ORIH) of purse seine fishery were also estimated at a high level from using fish-aggregating devices (FAD). However, due to skipjack tuna's high catches, the ORI of socio-economic benefit (ORIE) was estimated at a very low level. Due to the high bycatch rate, ORIB was high, and ORIS and ORIH were evaluated at a low level in longline fishery. Due to strengthern of fishing restrictions and increase of fishing costs, the ORIE was assessed to be very high. The ecosystem risk index (ERI) for two tuna fisheries was assessed low, but the overall FAD management by purse seine fishery is necessary at the ecosystem level.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anonymous. 2015. Report of the 2015 ISSF Stock Assessment Workshop: Characterizing uncertainty in stock assessment and management advice. ISSF Technical Report 2015-06. IOTC-2-15-WPTT17-INF02, 32.
  2. Abascal F, Lawson T and Williams P. 2020. Analysis of tropical purse seine length data for skipjack, bigeye and yellowfin tunas. WCPFC-SC10-2014/SA-IP-05, 25.
  3. Ashida H, Tanabe T and Satoh K. 2010. Reproductive biology of male skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis (Linnaeus) in the tropical western and central Pacific Ocean. Fish Sci 76, 785-793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-010-0282-y.
  4. de Bruyn P, Murua H and Aranda M. 2013. The Precautionary approach to fisheries management: How this is taken into account by Tuna regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs). Marine Policy 38, 397-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.06.019
  5. Chan V, Clarke R and Squires D. 2014. Full retention in tuna fisheries: Benefits, costs and unintended consequences. Marine Policy, 45, 213-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.10.016.
  6. Cheung W, Lam V, Sarmiento J, Kearney K, Watson R and Pauly D. 2009. Projecting global marine biodiversity impacts under climate change scenarios. Fish Fish 10, 235-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00315.x
  7. Cheung W, Lam V, Sarmiento J, Kearney K, Watson R, Zeller D and Pauly D. 2010. Large-scale redistribution of maximum fisheries catch potential in the global ocean under climate change. Glob. Change Biol 16, 24-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01995.x
  8. Cho HJ, Kim DN, Kim DH, Lee SI, Kwon Y and Ku JE. 2017. Estimating the productive efficient of distant-water longline vessels in Pacific Ocean using a Stochastic Frontier Approach. J Korean Soc Fish Technol 53, 357-362. https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2017.53.4.357
  9. Coulter A, Cashion T, Cisneros-Montemayor A, Popov S, Tsui G, Manach F, Schiller L, Palomares M, Zeller D and Pauly D. 2020. Using harmonized historical catch data to infer the expansion of global tuna fisheries. Fisheries Research 221. 105379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2019.105379.
  10. Ducharme-Barth N, Vincent M, Hampton J, Hamer P, Williams P and Pilling G. 2020. Stock assessment of bigeye tuna in the western and central Pacic Ocean. WCPFC-SC16-2020/SA-WP-03 (Rev.01), 144.
  11. FAO. 2013. Bycatch and non-tuna catch in the tropical tuna purse seine fisheries of the world. FAO Fisheries and aquaculture technical paper 568, 262.
  12. FAO. 2020. FAO Yearbook of fishery and aquaculture statistics 2018. 110. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb1213t.
  13. Gilman E, Suuronen P and Chaloupka. 2017. Discards in global tuna fisheries. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 582, 231-252. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12340.
  14. Griffiths S, Allain V, Hoyle S, Lawson T and Nicol S. 2018. Just a FAD? Ecosystem impacts of tuna purse-seine fishing associated with fish aggregating devices in the western Pacific Warm Pool Province. Fish Ocean, 28, 94-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/fog.12389.
  15. Harley S, Maunder M and Deriso R. 2005. Assessment of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the eastern Pacific Ocean. ICCAT 57, 218-241.
  16. Harley S and Suter JM. 2007. The potential use of time-area closures to reduce catches of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the purse-seine fishery of the eastern Pacific Ocean. Fish Bul 105, 49.
  17. Kang HJ. 2018. A study on the ecosystem-based spatio-temporal assessment and forecasting. Ph.D. Pukyong National University. 70.
  18. Kim DH and Zhang CI. 2011. Developing socioeconomic indicators for an ecosystem-based fisheries management approach: An application to the Korean large purse seine fishery. Fish Res 112, 134-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2011.02.001
  19. Kim H. 2020. A study on the spatio-temporal IFRAME approach for fisheries assessment and forecasting. Ph.D. Pukyong National University. 133.
  20. Majkowski J. 2007. Global Fishery Resources of Tuna and Tuna-like Species. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 483, 54.
  21. Maunder MN and Harley SJ. 2002. Status of bigeye tuna in the eastern Pacific Ocean in 2001 and outlook for 2002. In Stock assessment report 3: status of the tuna and billfish stocks in 2001. IATTC, 201-311.
  22. Maury O, Miller K, Campling L, Arrizabalaga H, Aumont O, Bodin T and Murtugudde R. 2013. A global science-policy partnership for progress toward sustainability of oceanic ecosystems and fisheries. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5, 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.05.008.
  23. McKechnie S. 2014. Analysis of longline size frequency data for bigeye and yellowfin tunas in the WCPO. WCPFC-SC10-2014/SA-IP-04, 14.
  24. Meltzer E. 2009. The quest for sustainable international fisheries: Regional efforts to implement the 1995 United Nations Fish Stock Agreement: An Overview for the May 2006 Review Conference. Ottawa: NRC Research Press.
  25. Miyake M, Miyabe N and Nakano H. 2004. Historical trends of tuna catches in the world. FAO Fisheries technical paper. No. 467, 74.
  26. Mooney-Seus M and Rosenberg A. 2007. Best practices for high seas fisheries management: Lessons learned. London: Chatham House. 8.
  27. Juan-Jorda M, Murua H, Arrizabalaga H, Dulvy N and Restrepo V. 2016. Report card on ecosystem-based fisheries management in tuna regional fisheries management organizations. Fish and Fisheries 19, 321-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12256
  28. O'Connor S., Ono R., Clarkson C. 2011. Pelagic fishing at 42,000 years before the present and the maritime skills of modern humans. Science 334, 1117-1121. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207703
  29. OECD. 2020. "Average wages" (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/cc3e1387-en (accessed on 08 November 2020)
  30. OECD. 2019. OECD Employment Outlook 2019: The Future of Work. OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9ee00155-en.
  31. Oh C, Kim S and Na J. 2009. Variations in Species Composition, Biomass, and Density in Shrimp Trawl Bycatch Across Seasons and Tidal Phases in Southern Korean Waters: Developing a Fisheries Risk Management Approach. Fish Aqua Sci 12, 138-151. https://doi.org/10.5657/fas.2009.12.2.138
  32. Park HW, Zhang CI, Kwon YJ, Seo YI, and Oh TY. 2013. A study on the risk scoring and risk index for the ecosystem-based fisheries assessment. J Kor Soc Fish Tech 49, 469-482. https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2013.49.4.469
  33. Peatman T, Barth D and Vincent M. 2020. Analysis of purse seine and longline size frequency data for bigeye and yellowfin tuna in the WCPO. WCPFC-SC16-2020/ SA-IP-18, 57.
  34. Richardson K, Hardesty B and Wilcox C. 2019. Estimates of fishing gear loss rates at a global scale: A literature review and meta‐analysis. Fish and Fisheries 20, 1218-1231. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12407
  35. Pilling G, Harley S, Nicol S, Williams P and Hampton J. 2015. Can the tropical Western and Central Pacific tuna purse seine fishery contribute to Pacific Island population food security? Food Security, 7, 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-014-0407-8.
  36. Pritzker P, Sullivan K and Callender R. 2015. 2015 NOAA Marine Debris Program Report Impact of "Ghost Fishing" via Derelict Fishing Gear. Silver Spring MD, 25.
  37. Sala E, Mayorga J, Costello C, Kroodsma D, Palomares M, Pauly D, Sumaila U and Zeller D. 2018. The economics of fishing the high seas. Sci Adv 4, eaat2504. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat2504.
  38. Scott G and Lopez J. 2014. THE USE OF FADS IN TUNA FISHERIES. Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies, 70.
  39. Seo YI. 2011. Ecosystem-based stock assessment and fisheries management in the southern sea of Korea. Ph.D. Pukyong National University, 198.
  40. Shannon CE and Wiener W. 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press Urbana, 125.
  41. Sun C, Wang W and Yeh S. 2005. Reproductive biology of ellowfin tuna in the central and western Pacific Ocean. WCPFC-SC1, BI WP-1, 15.
  42. Tickler D, Meeuwig J, Bryant K, David F, Forrest J, Gordon E, Larsen J, Oh B, Pauly D, Sumaila U and Zeller D. 2018a. Modern slavery and the race to fish. Nat Commun 9, 4643. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07118-9
  43. Tickler D, Meeuwig J, Palomares M, Pauly D and Zeller D. 2018b. Far from home: distance patterns of global fishing fleets. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar3279. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07118-9.
  44. Vincent M, Pilling G and Hampton J. 2019. Stock assessment of skipjack tuna in the western and central Pacific Ocean. WCPFC-SC15-2019/SA-WP-05-Rev2, 148.
  45. Vincent M, Ducharme-Barth N, Hamer P, Hampton J, Williams P and Pilling G. 2020. Stock assessment of yellowfin tuna in the western and central Pacific Ocean. WCPFC-SC16-2020/SA-WP-04(Rev.01), 151.
  46. WCPFC (Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission). 2019, WCPFC tuna fishery yearbook - Annual catch estimates. WCPFC, 155.
  47. Zhang CI, Kim S, Gunderson D, Marasco R, Lee JB, Park HW and Lee JH. 2009. An ecosystem-based fisheries assessment approach for Korean fisheries. Fish Res 100, 26-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2008.12.002
  48. Zhang CI, Park HW, Lim JH, Kwon HC and Kim DH. 2010. A study on indicators and reference points for the ecosystem-based resource assessment. J Kor Soc Fish Tech 46, 32-49. https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2010.46.1.032
  49. Zhu G, Dai X, Song L and Xu L. 2011. Size at Sexual Maturity of Bigeye Tuna Thunnus obesus (Perciformes: Scombridae) in the Tropical Waters: a Comparative Analysis. Turkish Journal of Fish Aqu Sci 11, 149-156. https://doi.org/10.4194/trjfas.2011.0119.