Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
Computed tomography (CT) apparatus has a fast inspection time and provides 2D and 3D images by reconstructing multiple images with a single inspection. In particular, with a Multi-Detector CT (MDCT), the test time is shortened to several seconds depending on the number of detector channels, enabling the imaging of the entire abdomen with just one breathing control.[1] In CT scan, the degree of transmission and absorption of X-rays, that is, the degree of appearance in the image varies according to the tissue density(Linear Attenuation Coefficient), and anatomical information such as bones, lungs and vessels can be observed in the image by applying various algorithms to the region of interest. In particular, bone is a material with high X-ray absorption rate; therefore, CT imaging is used to diagnose fracture or dislocation and even to plan a surgery. [2] The wrist joint itself is small and complex as it consists of eight carpals surrounded by five metacarpals, radius and ulnar, and the carpal tunnel at the base of the wrist has a very complex structure with the presence of the median nerve and several tendons. [3] Therefore, when examining the wrist, increasing the image quality is helpful for diagnosis. CT scan is usually performed by rotating the X-ray generator around the isocenter of the device. At this time, if the subject to be examined is out of the isocenter, it may increase the possibility of geometric distortion.[4] When scanning a wrist, the wrist is placed in the isocenter of the CT device, and this time, considering the amount of radiation exposure and the quality of the image, the examination is performed with the patient’s hand raised above the head to avoid contact with other body organs. In order to keep the wrist in the isocenter while being raised above the head, the patient's body is tilted to one side. Most of the general patients can maintain the posture; however, it is difficult for patients who are unconscious or have great pain, such as patients with a comminuted fracture, to maintain the posture. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the image taken from a patient who is unable to keep the wrist in the isocenter while examining the wrist. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the quality of wrist CT scan image by changing the central axis angle of the wrist and changing the number of channels of the device.
Ⅱ. MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this study, CT (Brilliance 64 slice, Philips, Holland) device and a wrist phantom (Hand/Wrist phantom RS-144T, Universal Medical, USA) were used. As shown in Table 1, conditions used for the test were kept constant in terms of the table height, window width/level, kV, mAs, SFOV, filter, etc. while changing the posture of the phantom.
Table 1. Scan Parameter
In the experiment, the combination of MDCT detector array was changed to 16, -40 and 64 channels. For each number of channels, the phantom was moved from the isocenter to the left and right along the X-axis and rotated -20° and -40° around the Z-axis, which was the major axis direction of the wrist, while performing examination.
1. Experiment on the change in the distance of the subject along the X-axis
In the experiment on the change in the location of the subject along the X-axis, the phantom was moved from the isocenter of the CT device (o cm) to the left by 5, 10 and 15 cm for the examination as shown in Figure 1. It was examined 1-20 times in total: 10 times each for isocenter (0 cm), 5 cm, 10 cm and 15 cm for each of the 16, 40 and 64 channel scans.
Fig. 1. Experiment on the change in the distance of the subject along the X-axis in which the point where the X-axis meets the radio-ulna joint is moved to the left by 0 cm (A), 5 cm (B), 10 cm (C) and 15 cm (D)
2. Experiment on the change in the angle of the subject around the Z-axis
The wrist is anatomically connected to the elbow and shoulder, and the shoulder extends outward around the patient's body. Looking at the direction where the center line of the isocenter and the major axis of the wrist coincide with the Z-axis, if the patient's body cannot move outside the gantry of the CT device, the wrist usually rotates around the Z-axis. Therefore, an experiment was conducted to rotate the wrist phantom around the Z-axis. At this time, the clockwise deviation was not considered as it was almost improbable in terms of the actual anatomical structure. Therefore, as shown in Figure 2, the experiment was performed on the case where it was located on the Z-axis and rotated by -20° and -40° . It was examined 60 times in total: 10 times each for the -20° and -40° deviations from the isocenter (0°) for each of the 16, -40 and 64 channel scans. After the scan, the data was re-arranged to 0° in the deviation state, and the image was reconsctructed.
Fig. 2. Experiment on the change in the angle of the subject around the Z-axis in which examination was performed while rotating the major axis of the wrist around the Z-axis by 0° (A), -20° (B) and -40° (C)
3. Image Analysis
For image analysis, the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) was calculated using image J and Originpro. MTF refers to the ability to distinguish two adjacent objects, which can be used for evaluating spatial resolution. MTF is the normalized magnitude of the Fourier transform of the line-spread function (LSF). In this study, For LDF, the edge-spread function (ESF) was obtained through differentiation after setting the Region of Interest (ROI) in radius and ulna. At this time, the MTF evaluation method used the slanted-edge method[5,6]. For statistics on the MTF value according to the distance along the X-axis for each number of channels, the average MTF value was analyzed through Kruskal Wallis test. The MTF calue according to angle of deviation around the Z-axis for each number of channels was subjected to an Mann-Whitney u-test. At this time, when the p value was less than 0.05, it was judged to be statistically significant.
Ⅲ. RESULT
This study conducted two types of experiments: the first experiment was conducted to examine the MTF changes according to the number of channels of the CT device and the X-axis distance, and the second experiment was on the MTF changes according to the deviation of the subject around the Z-axis.
1. MTF according to change in the distance of the subject along the X-axis
As a result of analyzing the MTF while moving the subject along the X-axis, in the 16-channel scan, the MTF was the highest at the point 0 cm away along the X-axis with 0.62±0.03, and the lowest at the point 15 cm away with 0.53±0.03(p<0.05). In the -40-channel scan, it was higher at the point 0 cm away with 0.59±0.02 than 0.49±0.03 at the point 15 cm away(p<0.05). In the 64-channel scan, it was the highest at the point 0 cm away along the X-axis with 0.59±0.01, and the lowest the lowest at the point 15 cm away with 0.51±0.02(p<0.05). In the results from the right side of the radius, the MTF values at the point 0 cm away were always higher than the values measures at the point 15 cm away regardless of the number of channels. In the right radius and ulna, the MTF values decreased with an increase in the distance regardless of the number of channels [Table 1].
Table. 1. MTF value according to the distance along the X-axis for each number of channels
2. MTF according to change in the angle of the subject around the Z-axis
As a result of analyzing the MTF while changing the angle of the subject around the Z-axis, the MTF was 0.59±0.03 when it was rotated -20° in the left radius; it was 0.67±0.02 when rotated -40°(p0.05). In the -40-channel and 64-channel scans, the MTF values were high after rotating -20° than -40°. For ulna, the MTF was the same at 0.60±0.01 after rotating -20° and -40° in the 16-channel scan(p>0.05), and the result was the same in the -40-channel scan(p>0.05). However, in the 64-channel scan, the MTF values were 0.59±0.01 at -20° and 0.64±0.04 at -40°, showing a higher value after rotating -40°(p<0.05) [Table 2].
Table. 2. MTF value according to angle of deviation around the Z-axis for each number of channels
Ⅳ. DISCUSSION
CT scan is a useful method that has excellent diagnostic value and provides anatomical information in a relatively short time through an image implemented as a tomography. However, since X-rays are rotated and irradiated around a single axis, image quality changes according to the positions of the X, Y and Z-axes. For examining a wrist with a particularly complex anatomical structure, it is advantageous in terms of X-ray exposure and image quality to perform the examination while the patient is in a prone or supine position with the hand raised above the head. The wrist is connected to the elbow and shoulder joints; therefore, the patient’s body should be moved to position the major axis of the wrist in the isocenter of the CT device. When examining the wrist of the patients who are unable to take such a posture, movements and deviations may occur along the X and Z-axes. Several previous studies have reported that failure to match the X and Y-axes in the isocenter of the CT device degrades the image quality in the imaging examination[7-9]. However, there are not enough studies conducted on the wrist, and there is no evaluation of the image quality caused by the deviation of the major axis of the wrist in the Z-axis. Therefore, in this study, the image quality was evaluated using a wrist-only phantom assuming the cases in which the subject was moved from the CT isocenter to the left along the X-axis and the major axis of the wrist was rotated around the Z-axis. For each variable, the changes according to the number of channels of the CT device were observed as well. As a result of the study, in the wrist examination with the subject moving along the X-axis, sharpness decreased as the distance from the isocenter increased, and there was no significant difference depending on the number of channels. Hara et. al[10] reported that MTF tended to decrease as the distance from isocenter increased in a comparative study of MTF between isocenter and peripheral area in multi-detector CT (MDCT). In addition, Utrup and Brown[11] reported that there was no significant difference in the X-axis and Y-axis according to the number of channels in their study on the comparison of MTF of the 16, 64 and 128-channel scans Comprehensively, the MTF decreases as the distance from the isocenter along the X-axis increases, which means that it cannot be compensated by increasing the number of channels of the CT device.
When the subject was rotated by -20° or -40° around the Z-axis, there was no apparent pattern for the MTF value for each number of channels according to the measurement position. According to Kwan et. al.[12], the z-axis is hardly affected by the MTF in axial images since the spatial resolution of the Z-axis is close to the physical resolution of the longitudinal direction. The reason that a certain pattern could not be confirmed in this study can be explained by the z-axis in the axial image that is hardly affected by the spatial resolution. Therefore, in a wrist CT examination, rotating the major axis direction of the wrist around Z-axis would not have a significant effect on MTF.
Ⅴ. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the movement of the patient’s wrist from the isocenter along the X-axis should be restrained as much as possible for a wrist joint CT scan. However, the deviation of the patient’s wrist around the Z-axis can be allowed depending on the condition of the patient without affecting the spatial resolution too much. Since this study did not evaluate SNR, additional SNR evaluation studies may be required. Therefore, this study is expected to provide basic data for the SNR evaluation studies in the future.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was supported by 2020 eulji university, University Innovation Support Project grant funded.
References
- C. D. Becker, P. A. Poletti, "The trauma concept:the role of MDCT in the diagnosis and management of visceral injuries", European Radiology Supplements, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. d105-d109, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10406-005-0122-9
- M. Zlotorowicz, J. Czubak, A. Caban, P. Kozinski, R. Boguslawska-Walecka, "The blood supply to the femoral head after posterior fracutre/dislocation of the hip, assessed by CT angiography", The Bone & Joint Journal, Vol. 95-B, No. 11, pp. 1453-1457, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32383
- MER. M. Patterson, MSK. W. Elder, MDS. F. Viegas, "Carpal bone anatomy measured by computer analysis of three-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography images", The Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 923-929, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80138-8
- J. F. Barrett, N. Keat, "Artifacts in CT: Recognition and Avoidance", Radiographis, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 1679-1691, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.246045065
- H. W. Cho, K. S. Chon, "Change of MTF for Sampling Interval in Digital Detector", Journal of Korean Society of Radiology, Vol. 8. No. 5, pp. 225-230, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.7742/Jksr.2014.8.5.225
- S. M. Elkhateeb, G. R. Torgersen, E. A. Amout, "Image quality assessement of clinically-applied CBCT protocols using a QAT phantom", Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 1-11, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.-20160075
- I. Ali, S. Ahmad, "Evaluation of the effects of sagging shifts on isocenter accuracy and image quality of Cone-beam CT from kV on-board imagers", Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 180-194, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.11-20/jacmp.v10i3.2930 https://doi.org/10.11-20/jacmp.v10i3.2930
- O. O. Akin-Akintayo, L. F. Alexander, R. Neill. MS, E. A. Krupinksi, X. Tang, P. K. Mittal, W. C. Small, C. C. Moreno, "Prevalence and severity of off-centering during diagnostic CT:Observations from 57,621 CT scans if the Chest, Abdomen, and/or Pelvis", Current Problems in diagnostic Radiology, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 229-234, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.-2018.02.007
- B. G. Baumert, P. Egli, S. Studer, C. Dehing, J. B. Davis, "Repositioning accuracy of fractionated stereotactic irradiation:assessment of isocentre alignment for different dental fixations by using sequential CT scanning", Radiotherapy and Oncology, Vol. 74, No. 1, pp. 61-66, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.-2004.08.002
- T. Hara, K. Ichikawa, S. Sanada, Y. Ida, "Image quality dependence on in-plane ppositions and directions for MDCT images", European Journal of Radiology, Vol. 75, No. 1, pp. 114-121, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.-2009.03.060
- S. J. Utrup, K. M. Brown, "Quanitfication and Elimination of Windmill Artifacts in Multi Slice CT", Medical imaging, Vol. 6913, pp. 691338, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.773020
- A. L. C. Kwan, J. M. Boone, K. Yang, S. Y. Huang, "Evaluation of the spatial resolution characteristics of a cone-beam breast CT scanner", Medical Physics, Vol. 34, No, 1, pp. 275-281, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2400830