대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학 (Journal of radiological science and technology)

  • 제43권5호
  • /
  • Pages.337-341
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2288-3509(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-1168(eISSN)
대한방사선과학회 (Korean Society of Radiological Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

유방촬영 시 몬테칼로 전사모사를 이용한 유방 성형 환자의 장기선량 평가

Assessment of Organ Dose in Mammoplasty Patient by Monte Carlo Simulation during Mammography

  • 김지수 (부산가톨릭대학교 보건과학대학 방사선학과) ;
  • 조용인 (동남권원자력의학원 영상의학과) ;
  • 김정훈 (부산가톨릭대학교 보건과학대학 방사선학과)
  • Kim, Ji-Soo (Department of Radiological Science, Catholic University of Pusan) ;
  • Cho, Yong-In (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Dongnam Institute of Radiological & Medical Science) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Hoon (Department of Radiological Science, Catholic University of Pusan)
  • 투고 : 2020.10.17
  • 심사 : 2020.10.28
  • 발행 : 2020.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Although the screening with a mammography has been shown to be economical, simple and effective in detecting breast cancer, it is accompanied by the risk from radiation. Therefore, this study analyzed the glandular dose and organ dose according to the target-filter combination and the presence and absence of implants using Monte Carlo simulation. The results indicate that at a tube voltage of 30 kV and a tube current of 50 mAs, the dose increased in the order of Mo/Mo. Mo/Rh, Rh/Rh and W/Rh in proportion to the atomic number of the target-filter. In addition, in phantom without implant a reduction in dose was seen when compared to the phantom with implant. The organ dose was highest in the lens except for the breast on the examination side regardless of the presence or absence of the implant. These results may contribute to use basic data for the diagnostic reference level of breast plastic surgery patients.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. National Cancer Center. National Cancer Registry Satistics; 2015.
  2. Lee JW. Body image, sexual life and sexual women after mastectomy [master's thesis]. Perth: University of HanYang; 2012.
  3. Hong GH. Study on average glandular dose measured using mammo phantom(CIRS model 15) on mammography equipment [master's thesis]. Perth: University of Korea; 2011.
  4. Lee DY, Lee JS. Evaluation of the space scattered dose according to the position of the radiation workers in mammography room. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2016;39(3):297-303. https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2016.39.3.01
  5. Hong DH. Evaluation of usefulness of image by using new compression paddle for mammoplasty patient during mammography. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2015;38(3):229-35. https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2015.38.3.06
  6. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Guidelines for patient dose recommendation, in mammography. Radiation Safety Management Series. 16:1-26.
  7. Salehi Z, Balvasi E, Aziz M. A review of the recent Monte Carlo (MC) simulation for dosimetry in mammographic applications. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences. 2018;14:76-81.
  8. Sari F, Mahdavi SR, Anbiaee R, Shirazi A. The effect of breast reconstruction prosthesis on photon dose distribution in breast cancer radiotherapy. Iranian Journal of Medical Physics. 2017;14(4):251-6.
  9. Cho JH, Lee HY, Im IC. Monitoring on dose index analyzed in the mammography. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology. 2016;10(7):477-82. https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2016.10.7.477
  10. Lee JS, Ko SJ. Image quality and dose evaluation using monte carlo simulation digital mammography system. The Korean Contents Association. 2013;14(6):1-8.
  11. Kim DH. Analysis of the image quality by tube voltage of digital mammography [maser's thesis]. Perth: University of Busan Catholic; 2014.
  12. Sin GS. Patient dose in mammography. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2005;28(4):293-9.
  13. Yang HJ. The study of aluminum face block fabrication for reducing exposure dose of thyroid glands and crystalline lens in mammography and its usefulness [master's thesis]. Perth: University of Korea; 2011.
  14. Carton AK, Bakic P, Ullberg C, Derand H, Andrew DA. Development of physical 3D anthropomorphic breast phantom. Medical Physics. 2011;38(2):891-6. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3533896
  15. Massound E, Nassef MH. Dose reduction during breast screening using monte carlo calculation. Arab Journal of Nuclear Science and Applications. 2017;50(1):232-8.
  16. Jung HR, Hong DH, Han BH. Testing and analysis of tube voltage and tube current in the radiation generator for mammography. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology; 2014;37(1):1-6.