Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association (지역연구)

Korean Regional Science Association (한국지역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sustainable Urban Industrial Space Policy: Experiences and Implications from US Cities

지속가능한 도시산업공간 정책 -미국 주요 도시의 경험과 시사점-

  • 김진오 (경희대학교 환경조경디자인학과) ;
  • 박정일 (계명대학교 도시계획학전공)
  • Received : 2020.08.31
  • Accepted : 2020.09.18
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study attempted to seek policy directions for development of sustainable urban industrial space through reviewing recent policies and projects of US cities that experienced urban industrial land replacement and industrial suburbanization. The policies and regulations for the urban industrial space preservation include the New York City's Industrial Business Zone, Chicago's Planned Manufacturing District, the no-net-loss framework in San Jose, and the subdivided and the state of the art in zoning systems in Philadelphia and Seattle. These policies and zoning systems have been effective for preventing the conversion of urban industrial lands to other uses, promoting business activities, and creating jobs for urban residents. In addition, the updated and innovative zoning systems allow for a wide variety of urban industrial spaces to meet newly emerging industrial demands. On the other hand, we suggested several policy implications through reviewing the cases of urban regeneration projects in Portland's Willamette Industrial Urban Renewal Area, Atlanta's BeltLine, and Milwaukee's Menomone Valley as follows: 1) updating and reinforcing spatial planning and policies for preservation and revitalization of urban industrial land; 2) considering existing businesses and local workers first; 3) setting up a participatory planning for local workers and residents; 4) preparing policies for brownfield cleanups.

본 연구는 미국 도시의 도시산업용지 보존 및 산업 교외화 방지 정책과 도시재생 프로젝트 사례 분석을 통해 지속가능한 도시산업공간 조성의 방향을 모색하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 본 연구는 뉴욕시의 Industrial Business Zone, 시카고의 Planned Manufacturing District, 산호세의 순상실 방지(no-net-loss)정책, 그리고 필라델피아와 시애틀에서 최근 도입된 용도지역제를 중심으로 미국 도시의 도시산업공간 정책과 제도를 검토하였다. 이들 정책과 제도의 시행은 도심의 산업용지가 타용도로 전환되는 것을 방지하고, 기업활동 증진과 도시민을 위한 일자리 창출에 긍정적인 효과가 있었다. 또한 보다 세분화되고 진화된 형태의 용도지역제의 도입은 변화하는 산업수요에 맞추어 보다 다양한 형태의 도시산업공간을 제공한다는 특징이 있었다. 한편 포틀랜드 Willamette Industrial Urban Renewal Area, 애틀랜타 BeltLine, 밀워키 메노모니 밸리를 중심으로 도시재생 프로젝트 계획사례를 분석한 결과 다음과 같은 정책적 시사점을 도출할 수 있었다. 첫째, 산업용지의 보전과 활성화를 위해 용도지역제 등을 통한 공간계획적 차원의 정책을 보완·강화할 것. 둘째, 산업용지의 효과적 보전과 재생을 위해서는 기존 산업용지의 토지이용과 고용주 및 고용인을 우선적으로 배려할 것. 셋째, 산업용지의 보전과 재생을 위한 용도지역제의 성공적 정착을 위해서는 지역주민의 적극적 참여와 배려를 위한 주민참여형 계획을 수립할 것. 마지막으로 도심 산업용지의 보전 과정에서 제기되는 민감한 환경오염 문제에 효과적으로 대응하기 위한 토지이용 전략과 정부의 적극적인 지원이 요구된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 국토연구원, 2018, 경제기반형 도시재생 매뉴얼, 세종: 국토연구원.
  2. 박정일, 2015, 고용접근성에 기반한 산업단지 교외화 지수개발 및 적용, 국토계획, 50(6), pp.159-172. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2015.10.50.6.159
  3. 박정일.최태림, 2015, 지속가능한 도시경제재생: 미국 메노모니 밸리의 경험과 시사점, 국토, pp.94-102.
  4. 서연미.김용환, 2015, 대도시 공업용지 변화와 관리정책 방향, 국토정책 Brief, no.498.
  5. 이다혜.주경식, 2013, 대도시 교외지역 제조업 입지와 종사자의 거주지, 한국지역지리학회지, 19(4), pp.641-653.
  6. 장철순, 2013, 산업단지 1,000개 시대와 산업입지 정책과제, 국토정책 Brief, no.420.
  7. Atlanta BeltLine, 2020, The Project, https://beltline.org (accessed July 10, 2020).
  8. Chapple, K., 2014, The highest and best use? Urban industrial land and job creation. Economic Development Quarterly, 28(4), pp.300-313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242413517134
  9. City and County of San Francisco, 2020, San Francisco Planning Code: SEC. 210.3. PDR Districts.
  10. City of Milwaukee, 1998, Market study, Engineering, and Land Use Plan for the Menomonee Valley.
  11. City of New York, 2005, New York City Industrial Policy: Protecting and Growing New York City's Industrial Job Base.
  12. City of Philadelphia, 2020, Philadelphia Zoning Code Information Manual: Quick Guide.
  13. City of San Jose, 2007, Approved Framework for Preservation of Employment Lands for the City of San Jose.
  14. Cummings, A. S., 2012, Is the Beltline Bad for Atlanta? Tropics of Meta (April 9, 2012).
  15. Davis, J., & Renski, H., 2020, Do Industrial Preservation Policies Protect and Promote Urban Industrial Activity? Examining the Impact of New York City's Industrial Business Zone Program, Journal of the American Planning Association, pp.1-12.
  16. Davis, J, 2018, NYC's Industrial Business Zone Program: Examining the Intersection Between Economic Development and Land Use Policy, American Planning Association: News & Views (April 2018).
  17. De Sousa, C., 2011, Milwaukee's Menomonee Valley: A Sustainable Re-Industrialization Best Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Institute for Environmental Science and Policy.
  18. Frey, W. H., & Speare, A., 1988, Regional and Metropolitan Growth and Decline in the United States. Russell Sage Foundation.
  19. Giegerich, A., 2012, Willamette urban renewal flounders. Portland Business Journal, (Jun 1, 2012).
  20. Glaeser, E. 2001. Job Sprawl: Employment Location in U.S. Metropolitan Areas. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution, Metropolitan Policy Program.
  21. Helper, S., Krueger, T., & Wial, H., 2012, Locating American Manufacturing: Trends in the Geography of Production. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.
  22. Kneebone, E., 2009, Job Sprawl Revisited: The Changing Geography of Metropolitan Employment. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.
  23. Leigh, N & Hoelzel, N., 2012, Smart Growth's Blind Side. Journal of American Planning Association, 78(1), pp.87-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2011.645274
  24. Leigh, N. G., Driemeier, K., Hoelzel, N., Jain, R., Mansbach, J., Morrow, E., Moseley, C., Stevens, S., & Zaya, E., 2009, A Plan for Industrial Land and Sustainable Industry in the City of Atlanta, Georgia Tech School of City and Regional Planning.
  25. Leigh, N. G., Hoelzel, N. Z., Kraft, B. R., & Dempwolf, C. S., 2014, Sustainable urban industrial development, American Planning Association.
  26. Lester, T. W., Kaza, N., & Kirk, S., 2013, Making room for manufacturing: Understanding industrial land conversion in cities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(4), pp.295-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.915369
  27. Menomonee Valley Partners, 2004, Development Objectives for the Menomonee Valley Stockyard.
  28. Mistry, N., & Byron, J., 2011, The Federal Role in Supporting Urban Manufacturing, Pratt Center for Community Development and Brookings Institution.
  29. Park, J-I., & Leigh, N. G., 2017, Urban industrial land loss and foreign direct investment-related manufacturing job sprawl: An Atlanta, Georgia MSA case study, Journal of Urban Technology, 24(4), pp.95-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2017.1348883
  30. Portland Development Commission, Portland Harbor. http://vmw.pdc.us/ura/willamette-industrial/harborredi.asp (accessed July 10, 2020).
  31. Rast, J., 1999, Remaking Chicago: The political origins of urban industrial change, DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.
  32. San Francisco Planning Department, 2002, Industrial Land in San Francisco: Understanding Production, Distribution, and Repair.
  33. Savitch-Lew, A., 2018, With de Blasio's rezonings, city's industrial land becomes scarcer. City Limits.
  34. Stanback, T. M., & Knight, R. V., 1976, Suburbanization and the City. Allanheld, Osmun.
  35. Stoll, M. A., 2005, Job Sprawl and the Spatial Mismatch between Blacks and Jobs Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution, Metropolitan Policy Program.
  36. Williams, Sarah & Klein, N., 2009, Commercial Uses Invading Mayor's Industrial Business Zones. New York Industrial Retention Network.