DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Design of Reading and Discussion Activities using Recommended Book List: The Case of D University

권장도서목록을 활용한 독서토론활동의 설계 - D대학의 사례를 중심으로 -

  • 윤유라 (동의대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 이은주 (동의대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2020.08.25
  • Accepted : 2020.09.07
  • Published : 2020.09.30

Abstract

For University students, reading is one of the important way of character education and career education that can give students the power to recognize and adapt to changes in society. The university supports the reading activities of university students in various ways, such as opening liberal arts courses related to reading or setting up required credits. In addition, it supports activities such as selecting the recommended book list for university students and providing the list. The purpose of this study is to analyze the problems of the current university's recommended book list and methods of using reading, and to propose improvement plans. To this end, using D University as an example, the current status of the recommended book list and reading discussion program were identified, and problems were investigated. In the current recommended book list, the subject area and list did not properly reflect the times, and the information on the provided list was very simple. Also, it was found that there was no suggestion on how to use the recommended book list. Through this, the recommended book list with the addition of bibliographic information and composition of the subject area was proposed. In addition, the reading discussion method was structured using Havruta.

대학생에게 독서란, 단순히 자신의 인격을 수양하고 즐거움을 위한 개념을 넘어 사회의 변화를 인식하고 적응해나갈 수 있는 힘을 길러 줄 수 있는 중요한 인성 교육이자 진로 교육의 방법 중 하나이다. 이에 대학에서는 독서관련의 교양수업을 개설하거나 필수 학점을 구성하는 등의 강제적인 지도에서부터 대학생에게 적합한 인문·교양도서를 선정하고 그 목록을 제공하는 등의 간접적인 지원활동에 이르기까지 다양한 방식으로 대학생의 독서활동을 지원하고 있다. 본 연구는 현재 대학에서 운영하고 있는 독서지원방법 중 권장도서목록과 이를 활용한 독서활용방법의 문제점을 분석하고 이에 대한 개선방안을 제안하는 것에 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 D대학의 권장도서목록과 독서토론프로그램의 현황을 파악하고 문제점을 알아보았다. 기존의 권장도서목록은 주제분야와 자료가 현시대상을 제대로 반영하지 못하고 있었으며, 제공되는 목록에 대한 정보도 서지사항정도에 지나지 않음을 알 수 있었다. 또한 권장도서목록을 활용방법에 대한 제안도 부재함을 알 수 있었다. 이에 본 연구에서는 주제분야의 다양한 구성과 참조정보를 보완한 권장도서목록을 제안하였고, 하브루타를 활용하여 독서토론방법을 구조화하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Goo, Jahwang. 2007. "A Preparatory Study for College Writing Education." EOMUNYEONGU, 53: 279-298. https://doi.org/10.17297/rsll.2007.53..010
  2. Kim, Ra Yeon. 2007. "A Study of the Aspects of Changes in Cognitive Reading Behavior During Book Club Activity." Journal of Reading Research, 17: 83-108.
  3. Kim, Byeong Goo. 2011. "A Study on the Structured Way of the Education of Reading and Debate at University Utilizing Reading Debate Model." Korean Language & Literature, 78: 487-515.
  4. Kim, Seung-Hoan. 2004. "A Study of the Reading Material Use on the Reading Discussion." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 35(3): 1-22.
  5. Kim, Yang Sun. 2009. "The Model Study for The Education of Reading and Discussion at University." Studies in Humanities, 23: 28-50.
  6. Kim, Joo-Eon. 2019. "A Study on the Orientation of 'Reading Classics' as a LAC Subject." Korean Journal of General Education, 13(4): 235-253.
  7. Park, SangJoon. 2009. "A Study on the Problem Solving Method of University Debate Education." EOMUNHAK, 104: 27-56.
  8. Park, Jeong-Gil. 2006. "A Study on the Solution to the Problem of University Students Poor Readings." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 37(4): 3-22.
  9. Baek, Jung-Ki and Je-Kyung Lee. 2019. "The Mediating Effect of Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy on Relationship between Perceived Social Support and Career Adaptability of College Students." The Journal of Career Education Research, 32(2): 79-98. https://doi.org/10.32341/JCER.2019.06.32.2.79
  10. So, Byoung Moon. 2019. "An Analysis on Impact of the Self-selected Reading Program Using Recommended Book Lists to High School Students' Reading Motivation." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(1): 177-198. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.1.201903.177
  11. Son, Seung Nam. 2013. "The Great Books Program and the Direction of Humanities & Classics Education in the University." Korean Journal of General Education, 7(4): 449-472.
  12. 신기철, 신용철. 1996. 새우리말 큰사전. 서울: 삼성출판사.
  13. Lee, Kook-Hwan. 2014. "Reading Education as University General Education." Dongnam Journal of Korean Language & Literature, 37: 389-421.
  14. Lee, Man-Soo. 2010. "A Study on the Selection of the Required Reading Books for College Students." The Journal of Humanities, 31: 184-224.
  15. Lee, SeungYun. 2015. "Methods of Guidance on Reading Debate to Promote Critical/ Creative Thinking Capabilities." The Korean Journal of Literacy Research, 13: 11-36.
  16. 이용숙. 2005. 실행연구방법. 서울: 학지사.
  17. Jang, Kye Young. 2009. The Development of the Career Adaptability Scale for the Korean University Students. Ph. D. diss., Sookmyung Women's University.
  18. Jeong, JaeWon and Euna Lee. 2018. "Gender Training to Enhance University Students' Gender Sensitivity." Korean Journal of General Education, 12(5): 11-35.
  19. 坂本一郎. 1971. 現代の讀書心理學. 東京: 金子書房.
  20. Hezki, Arieli and Jin-Ja Kim. 2014. Talmudic Havruta Learning. Seoul: iMD Center.
  21. Savickas, M. L. 1997. "Career Adaptability: An Integrative Construct for Life-Span, Life-Space Theory." Career Development Quarterly, 45(3): 247-259. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1997.tb00469.x
  22. 위키피디아. [인용 2020. 8. 5].