DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Osteotomy Angle on Tibial Angulation and Torsion During CORA-Based Leveling Osteotomy in Toy Breed Dogs: A Computer Modeling-Based Study

  • Jeong, Youngeun (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jeong, Jaemin (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Cho, Cheongwoon (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jeong, SeongMok (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Hae Beom (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2020.03.31
  • Accepted : 2020.08.03
  • Published : 2020.08.31

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of osteotomy angle and tibial proximal segment rotation angle on angular and torsional tibial deformities and to assess the trends of these deformities during the rotation of the tibial proximal segment in a center of rotation of angulation (CORA)-based leveling osteotomy (CBLO) by performing computer modeling of the tibia. Four tibias of toy breed dogs with no history of lameness were used in this study. Osteotomies were performed in the proximal tibias at angles of 0°, 10°, 20°, -10°, and -20°, perpendicular to either the proximodistal or craniocaudal tibial axes. The mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) and transcondylar (TC) and distal cranial tibial (CnT) axes were used to measure angular and torsional deformities, respectively. All tibias showed an increase in angular and rotational deformities with an increase in the tibial plateau rotation angle. The tibia with osteotomies performed in the proximodistal and craniocaudal directions showed the highest magnitude of torsional and angular deformities, respectively. The results of this study revealed a tendency of occurrence of angular and torsional deformities with osteotomy performed along the proximodistal and craniocaudal directions in the CBLO.

Keywords

References

  1. Apelt D, Kowaleski MP, Dyce J. Comparison of computed tomographic and standard radiographic determination of tibial torsion in the dog. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 457-462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00069.x
  2. Aper R, Kowaleski MP, Apelt D, Tod Drost W, Dyce J. Computed tomographic determination of tibial torsion in the dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005; 46: 187-191.
  3. Aragon CL, Budsberg SC. Applications of evidence-based medicine: cranial cruciate ligament injury repair in the dog. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 93-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2005.00016.x
  4. Arnoczky S, Marshall J. The cruciate ligaments of the canine stifle: an anatomical and functional analysis. Am J Vet Res 1977; 38: 1807-1814.
  5. Dismukes DI, Tomlinson JL, Fox DB, Cook JL, Song KJE. Radiographic measurement of the proximal and distal mechanical joint angles in the canine tibia. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 699-704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007.00323.x
  6. Elkins A, Pechman R, Kearney M, Herron M. A retrospective study evaluating the degree of degenerative joint disease in the stifle joint of dogs following surgical repair of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1991; 27: 533-540.
  7. Innes J, Bacon D, Lynch C, Pollard A. Long-term outcome of surgery for dogs with cranial cruciate ligament deficiency. Vet Rec 2000; 147: 325-328. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.147.12.325
  8. Jerram R, Walker A. Cranial cruciate ligament injury in the dog: pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. N Z Vet J 2003; 51: 149-158.
  9. Kim SE, Pozzi A, Kowaleski MP, Lewis DD. Tibial osteotomies for cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency in dogs. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007.00361.x
  10. Kishi EN, Hulse D. Owner evaluation of a cora-based leveling osteotomy for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament injury in dogs. Vet Surg 2016; 45: 507-514. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.12472
  11. Korvick D, Johnson A, Schaeffer D. Surgeons' preferences in treating cranial cruciate ligament ruptures in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994; 205: 1318-1324.
  12. Korvick D, Pijanowski G, Schaeffer D. Three-dimensional kinematics of the intact and cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle of dogs. J Biomech 1994; 27: 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(94)90034-5
  13. Raske M, Hulse D, Beale B, Saunders WB, Kishi E, Kunze C. Stabilization of the CORA based leveling osteotomy for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament injury using a bone plate augmented with a headless compression screw. Vet Surg 2013; 42: 759-764. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12035.x
  14. Reif U, Hulse DA, Hauptman JG. Effect of tibial plateau leveling on stability of the canine cranial cruciate-deficient stifle joint: an in vitro study. Vet Surg 2002; 31: 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1053/jvet.2002.31041
  15. Slocum B, Devine T. Cranial tibial thrust: a primary force in the canine stifle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1983; 183: 456-459.
  16. Slocum B, Slocum TD. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the canine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1993; 23: 777-795.
  17. Vasquez B, Hulse D, Beale B, Kerwin S, Andrews C, Saunders BW. Second-look arthroscopic findings after CORA-based leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2018; 47: 261-266.
  18. Vasseur P. Clinical results following nonoperative management for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. Vet Surg 1984; 13: 243-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.1984.tb00801.x
  19. Vasseur P, Berry C. Progression of stifle osteoarthrosis following reconstruction of the cranial cruciate ligament in 21 dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1992; 28: 129-136.
  20. Warzee CC, Dejardin LM, Arnoczky SP, Perry RL. Effect of tibial plateau leveling on cranial and caudal tibial thrusts in canine cranial cruciate-deficient stifles: An in vitro experimental study. Vet Surg 2001; 30: 278-286. https://doi.org/10.1053/jvet.2001.21400
  21. Wh eler JL, C ross A R, G ingrich W. In v itro effects of osteotomy angle and osteotomy reduction on tibial angulation and rotation during the tibial plateau-leveling osteotomy procedure. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 371-377. https://doi.org/10.1053/jvet.2003.50038