DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Measurement of Thoracic Limb Joint Reference Angles in Purebred Shih-Tzu Dogs by Computed Tomography

  • Jeong, Jaemin (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Eunki (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jeong, Youngeun (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jeong, Seong Mok (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Hae Beom (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kwon, Youngsam (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2020.03.07
  • Accepted : 2020.07.01
  • Published : 2020.08.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish normal values for the thoracic limb joint reference angles in Shih Tzu dogs and to describe the standardized CT methodology for measuring the joint reference angle of the humerus. Five pairs of thoracic limbs of Shih Tzu dogs were collected for the CT scans in this study. Three blinded observers measured the joint reference angle of the humerus and radius for each dog by using CT scans in the frontal, sagittal, and axial planes. The means (± SDs) for the average of the right and left humeral joint reference angles were as follows: mMPHA, 83.74 ± 3.95°; mLDHA, 85.04 ± 2.57°; mCaPHA, 46.75 ± 2.20°; mCrDHA, 79.47 ± 1.97°; and HTA, 19.16 ± 2.38°. Means (± SD) for the average of right and left of the radial joint reference angles were as follows: aMPRA, 85.04 ± 1.58°; aLDRA, 87.59 ± 1.37°; aCrPRA, 84.60 ± 1.46°; aCdDRA, 84.27 ± 1.79°; and RTA, 20.91 ± 3.00°. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the joint reference angles for the inter- and intraobserver reliability were good to excellent, except those for the mCrHA and HTA were moderate. Our results suggest that the method of measuring joint reference angles of other long bones by using CT can be applied to thoracic limbs and can extract valid values for one specific breed.

Keywords

References

  1. Fox DB, Tomlinson JL, Cook JL, Breshears LM. Principles of uniapical and biapical radial deformity correction using dome osteotomies and the center of rotation of angulation methodology in dogs. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2005.00114.x
  2. Quinn MK, Ehrhart N, Johnson AL, Schaeffer DJ. Realignment of the radius in canine antebrachial growth deformities treated with corrective osteotomy and bilateral (type II) external fixation. Vet Surg 2000; 29: 558-563.
  3. Jevens DJ, Decamp CE. Bilateral distal fibular growth abnormalities in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 202: 421-422.
  4. Paley D. Normal lower limb alignment and joint orientation, In: Principles of deformity correction, 1st ed, Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 2002: 1-18.
  5. Dismukes DI, Tomlinson JL, Fox DB, Cook JL, Song KJE. Radiographic measurement of the proximal and distal mechanical joint angles in the canine tibia. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 699-704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007.00323.x
  6. Kroner K, Cooley K, Hoey S, Hetzel SJ, Bleedorn JA. Assessment of radial torsion using computed tomography in dogs with and without antebrachial limb deformity. Vet Surg 2017; 46: 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.12589
  7. Wood MC, Fox DB, Tomlinson JL. Determination of the mechanical axis and joint orientation lines in the canine humerus: a radiographic cadaveric study. Vet Surg 2014; 43: 414-417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12134.x
  8. Tomlinson JL, Fox DB, Cook JL, Keller GG. Measurement of femoral angles in four dog breeds. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 593-598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007.00309.x
  9. Kwan TW, Marcellin-Little DJ, Harrysson OL. Correction of biapical radial deformities by use of bi-level hinged circular external fixation and distraction osteogenesis in 13 dogs. Vet Surg 2014; 43: 316-329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12114.x
  10. Martinez S, Fajardo R, Valdes J, Ulloa-Arvizu R, Alonso R. Histopathologic study of long-bone growth plates confirms the basset hound as an osteochondrodysplastic breed. Can J Vet Res 2007; 71: 66.
  11. Tobias, Johnston. Veterinary surgery: Small Animal. 2012.
  12. Smith EJ, Marcellin-Little DJ, Harrysson OL, Griffith EH. Influence of chondrodystrophy and brachycephaly on geometry of the humerus in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016; 29: 220-226. https://doi.org/10.3415/vcot-15-11-0181
  13. Marcellin-Little DJ, Ferretti A, Roe SC, Deyoung DJ. Hinged Ilizarov external fixation for correction of antebrachial deformities. Vet Surg 1998; 27: 231-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.1998.tb00122.x
  14. Meola SD, Wheeler JL, Rist CL. Validation of a technique to assess radial torsion in the presence of procurvatum and valgus deformity using computed tomography: a cadaveric study. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 525-529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00399.x
  15. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2009.
  16. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiro Med 2016; 15: 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
  17. Knapp JL, Tomlinson JL, Fox DB. Classification of angular limb defromities affecting the canine radius and ulna using the center of rotation of angulation method. Vet Surg 2016; 45: 295-302 https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.12460
  18. Fasanella FJ, Tomlinson JL, Welihozkiy A. Radiographic measurements of the axes and joint angles of the canine radius and ulna. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: A11.