Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of soft tissue grafting prior to orthodontic treatment on preventing gingival recession in dogs

  • Song, Young Woo (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jung, Heekyu (Department of Orthodontics, The Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Han, Seo Yeon (Department of Orthodontics, The Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Paeng, Kyeong-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Myong Ji (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Cha, Jae-Kook (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Choi, Yoon Jeong (Department of Orthodontics, The Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2020.01.22
  • Accepted : 2020.04.20
  • Published : 2020.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of prophylactic gingival grafting in the mandibular anterior labial area for preventing orthodontically induced gingival recession. Methods: Eight mongrel dogs received gingival graft surgery at the first (I1) and third (I3) mandibular incisors on both sides based on the following group allocation: AT group (autogenous connective tissue graft on I1), AT-control group (contralateral side in the AT group), CM group (xenogeneic cross-linked collagen matrix graft on I3) and CM-control group (contralateral side in the CM group). At 4 weeks after surgery, 6 incisors were splinted and proclined for 4 weeks, followed by 16 weeks of retention. At 24 weeks after surgery, casts were made and compared with those made before surgery, and radiographic and histomorphometric analyses were performed. Results: Despite the proclination of the incisal tip (by approximately 3 mm), labial gingival recession did not occur. The labial gingiva was thicker in the AT group (1.85±0.50 mm vs. 1.76±0.45 mm, P>0.05) and CM group (1.90±0.33 mm vs. 1.79±0.20 mm, P>0.05) than in their respective control groups. Conclusions: The level of the labial gingival margin did not change following labial proclination of incisors in dogs. Both the AT and CM groups showed enhanced gingival thickness.

Keywords

References

  1. Zucchelli G, Mounssif I. Periodontal plastic surgery. Periodontol 2000 2015;68:333-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12059
  2. Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J, Sinclair F, Thilander B. Some periodontal tissue reactions to orthodontic tooth movement in monkeys. J Clin Periodontol 1987;14:121-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1987.tb00954.x
  3. Rasperini G, Acunzo R, Cannalire P, Farronato G. Influence of periodontal biotype on root surface exposure during orthodontic treatment: a preliminary study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2015;35:665-75.
  4. Jung UW, Kim CS, Choi SH, Kim S. Gingival coverage of iatrogenically denuded labial bone resulting from thermal trauma. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013;33:635-9. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1024
  5. Junior MM, Anchieta RB, Rocha EP, Pereira JA, Archangelo CM, Freitas-Junior AC, et al. The influence of the alveolar ridge shape on the stress distribution in a free-end saddle removable partial denture supported by implant. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2011;24:168-75.
  6. Al-Wahadni A, Linden GJ. Dentine hypersensitivity in Jordanian dental attenders. A case control study. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:688-93. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.290804.x
  7. Reiker J, van der Velden U, Barendregt DS, Loos BG. A cross-sectional study into the prevalence of root caries in periodontal maintenance patients. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26:26-32. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.1999.260105.x
  8. Ravald N, Hamp SE. Prediction of root surface caries in patients treated for advanced periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1981;8:400-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1981.tb00889.x
  9. Yared KF, Zenobio EG, Pacheco W. Periodontal status of mandibular central incisors after orthodontic proclination in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:6.e1-8.
  10. Joss-Vassalli I, Grebenstein C, Topouzelis N, Sculean A, Katsaros C. Orthodontic therapy and gingival recession: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2010;13:127-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01491.x
  11. Garg N, Bhagyalakshmi A, Raghunath N, Shivalinga B, Avinash B. Gingival biotype and its relation to incisors' inclination and dentopapillary complex: an in vivo study. Int J Orthod Rehabil 2017;8:11. https://doi.org/10.4103/2349-5243.200219
  12. Melsen B, Allais D. Factors of importance for the development of dehiscences during labial movement of mandibular incisors: a retrospective study of adult orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:552-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.12.026
  13. Djeu G, Hayes C, Zawaideh S. Correlation between mandibular central incisor proclination and gingival recession during fixed appliance therapy. Angle Orthod 2002;72:238-45.
  14. Renkema AM, Fudalej PS, Renkema A, Bronkhorst E, Katsaros C. Gingival recessions and the change of inclination of mandibular incisors during orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 2013;35:249-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjs045
  15. Renkema AM, Navratilova Z, Mazurova K, Katsaros C, Fudalej PS. Gingival labial recessions and the post-treatment proclination of mandibular incisors. Eur J Orthod 2015;37:508-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cju073
  16. Choi YJ, Chung CJ, Kim KH. Periodontal consequences of mandibular incisor proclination during presurgical orthodontic treatment in class III malocclusion patients. Angle Orthod 2015;85:427-33. https://doi.org/10.2319/021414-110.1
  17. Morris JW, Campbell PM, Tadlock LP, Boley J, Buschang PH. Prevalence of gingival recession after orthodontic tooth movements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;151:851-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.09.027
  18. Dorfman HS. Mucogingival changes resulting from mandibular incisor tooth movement. Am J Orthod 1978;74:286-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(78)90204-X
  19. Maynard JG Jr, Ochsenbein C. Mucogingival problems, prevalence and therapy in children. J Periodontol 1975;46:543-52. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1975.46.9.543
  20. Boyd RL. Mucogingival considerations and their relationship to orthodontics. J Periodontol 1978;49:67-76. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1978.49.2.67
  21. Matter J. Free gingival grafts for the treatment of gingival recession. A review of some techniques. J Clin Periodontol 1982;9:103-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1982.tb01226.x
  22. Vanarsdall RL. Orthodontics and periodontal therapy. Periodontol 2000 1995;9:132-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1995.tb00061.x
  23. Kloukos D, Eliades T, Sculean A, Katsaros C. Indication and timing of soft tissue augmentation at maxillary and mandibular incisors in orthodontic patients. A systematic review. Eur J Orthod 2014;36:442-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjt073
  24. Hwang D, Wang HL. Flap thickness as a predictor of root coverage: a systematic review. J Periodontol 2006;77:1625-34. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.060107
  25. Cairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U. Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2014;41 Suppl 15:S44-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12182
  26. Zucchelli G, Mele M, Stefanini M, Mazzotti C, Marzadori M, Montebugnoli L, et al. Patient morbidity and root coverage outcome after subepithelial connective tissue and de-epithelialized grafts: a comparative randomized-controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37:728-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01550.x
  27. Song YW, Kim S, Waller T, Cha JK, Cho SW, Jung UW, et al. Soft tissue substitutes to increase gingival thickness: histologic and volumetric analyses in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2019;46:96-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13034
  28. Schmitt CM, Matta RE, Moest T, Humann J, Gammel L, Neukam FW, et al. Soft tissue volume alterations after connective tissue grafting at teeth: the subepithelial autologous connective tissue graft versus a porcine collagen matrix - a pre-clinical volumetric analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2016;43:609-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12547
  29. Thoma DS, Zeltner M, Hilbe M, Hammerle CH, Husler J, Jung RE. Randomized controlled clinical study evaluating effectiveness and safety of a volume-stable collagen matrix compared to autogenous connective tissue grafts for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites. J Clin Periodontol 2016;43:874-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12588
  30. Kilkenny C, Browne W, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DGNC3Rs Reporting Guidelines Working Group. Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments: the ARRIVE guidelines. Br J Pharmacol 2010;160:1577-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00872.x
  31. Albandar JM, Kingman A. Gingival recession, gingival bleeding, and dental calculus in adults 30 years of age and older in the United States, 1988-1994. J Periodontol 1999;70:30-43. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.1.30
  32. Kassab MM, Cohen RE. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:220-5. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0137
  33. Ruf S, Hansen K, Pancherz H. Does orthodontic proclination of lower incisors in children and adolescents cause gingival recession? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:100-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70244-6
  34. Renkema AM, Fudalej PS, Renkema A, Kiekens R, Katsaros C. Development of labial gingival recessions in orthodontically treated patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:206-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.09.018
  35. Thoma DS, Hammerle CH, Cochran DL, Jones AA, Gorlach C, Uebersax L, et al. Soft tissue volume augmentation by the use of collagen-based matrices in the dog mandible -- a histological analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38:1063-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01786.x
  36. Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Sager M, Herten M, Sculean A, Becker J. Biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen membranes: an experimental study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:369-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01108.x
  37. Grossman ES, Forbes ME. Studies related to reaction of supporting soft tissue to denture wear: the histological response of vervet monkey oral epithelium to a -80 mmHg vacuum. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:587-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1990.tb01430.x
  38. Vignoletti F, Nunez J, de Sanctis F, Lopez M, Caffesse R, Sanz M. Healing of a xenogeneic collagen matrix for keratinized tissue augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:545-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12441
  39. Thoma DS, Naenni N, Benic GI, Hammerle CH, Jung RE. Soft tissue volume augmentation at dental implant sites using a volume stable three-dimensional collagen matrix - histological outcomes of a preclinical study. J Clin Periodontol 2017;44:185-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12635

Cited by

  1. Changes of Periodontal Tissues Because of Orthodontic Treatment: A Retrospective Study vol.12, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/23202068211003416