Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회지)

Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Microleakage Assessment of Resin Infiltration Combined Restoration in Artificial Decalcified-Cavitated Lesion

인공 우식 수복시 레진 침투법 전처리의 미세누출에 대한 효과

  • Jang, Eunjeong (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Soyoung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Shin, Jonghyun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Shin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Taesung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 장은정 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 박소영 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 신종현 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김신 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 정태성 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2019.11.05
  • Accepted : 2019.12.03
  • Published : 2020.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate the restoration combined with resin infiltration (RI) of early cavitated smooth surface caries lesion in terms of microleakage. Flowable resin and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) were compared. Sound 20 extracted 3rd molars were divided into 2 groups randomly. Artificial decalcified lesion was induced. Cavities were prepared on the mesial and distal surfaces, and randomly set as experimental and control group. RI was applied to the experimental group before cavity restoration. The control group was restored without RI. In group I and II, flowable resin and RMGIC was used for restoration respectively. After thermocycling and silver nitrate immersion, microleakage was assessed by μ-CT. Depth of microleakage was lower in experimental group than control group only in group II (p = 0.05). Microleakage depth was lower in group II than group I in both experimental and control groups (p = 0.05). RI pretreatment before restoration of early cavitated caries lesions might reduce the microleakage and help long-term maintenance of restoration. In this study, RMGIC was less polymerization shrinkage. Restoration with RMGIC after RI pretreatment reduced the microleakage of the restoration compared to the flowable resin.

이 연구는 와동이 형성된 초기 우식 병소를 재현하여 레진 침투법 처리 후 복합 레진과 레진 강화형 글라스아이오노머 시멘트로 수복을 시행하고 그에 따른 미세누출의 정도를 평가하기 위해 수행되었다. 건전한 20개의 발치된 제3대구치에 인공 우식을 유발하고 무작위로 I군과 II군으로 나누었다. 각 치아의 근원심면에 각각 와동을 형성하여 무작위로 실험군과 대조군으로 설정하였다. 실험군에는 레진 침투법 전처리를 시행하였고 대조군에는 전처리 없이 수복하였으며, I군은 유동성 레진을, II군은 레진 강화형 글라스아이오노머 시멘트로 수복하였다. 열순환 및 질산은 침지 후 μ-CT로 미세누출 양상을 확인하였다. 질산은 침투 깊이는 I군과 II군 모두에서 실험군이 대조군에 비하여 낮았으나, 통계적 유의성은 II군에서만 확인되었다. 재료 별로 비교 시 실험군과 대조군 모두 I군에 비해 II군의 침투 깊이가 통계적으로 유의하게 낮았다. 인공적으로 재현한 와동성 초기 우식 병소에 대하여 수복 전 레진 침투법 전처리를 하는 것은 치면과 수복물 계면에서의 미세누출을 감소시켰다. 레진 침투법 전처리 후 레진 강화형 글라스아이오노머 시멘트로 수복하였을 때 유동성 레진에 비하여 미세누출이 감소하는 결과를 얻었으며 실험적인 한계를 고려할 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Frencken JE, Peters MC, Eden E, et al. : Minimal intervention dentistry for managing dental caries-a review: report of a FDI task group. Int Dent J, 62:223-243, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12007
  2. Banerjee A, Frencken J, Schwendicke F, Innes N : Contemporary operative caries management: consensus recommendations on minimally invasive caries removal. Br Dent J, 223:215, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.672
  3. Schwendicke F, Frencken J, Ricketts D, et al. : Managing carious lesions: consensus recommendations on carious tissue removal. Adv Dent Res, 28:58-67, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516639271
  4. Gray G, Shellis P: Infiltration of resin into white spot carieslike lesions of enamel : an in vitro study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 10:27-32, 2002.
  5. Mueller J, Meyer-Lueckel H, Kielbassa A, et al. : Inhibition of lesion progression by the penetration of resins in vitro: influence of the application procedure. Oper Dent, 31:338-345, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2341/05-39
  6. Ratledge D, Kidd E, Beighton D : A clinical and microbiological study of approximal carious lesions. Caries Res, 35:3, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1159/000047423
  7. Toda S, Featherstone J : Effects of fluoride dentifrices on enamel lesion formation. J Dent Res, 87:224-227, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700303
  8. Alani AH, Toh CG : Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent, 22:173-185, 1997.
  9. Landis JR, Koch GG : The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 159-174, 1977.
  10. Soncini JA, Maserejian NN, Hayes C, et al. : The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. J Am Dent Assoc, 138:763-772, 2007. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0264
  11. Bernardo M, Luis H, Leitao J, et al. : Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc, 138:775-783, 2007. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0265
  12. Fontana M, Gonzalez-Cabezas C : Secondary caries and restoration replacement: An unresolved problem. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 21:15-18, 21-14, 26, 2000.
  13. Kermanshahi S, Santerre J, Cvitkovitch D, Finer Y : Biodegradation of resin-dentin interfaces increases bacterial microleakage. J Dent Res, 89:996-1001, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510372885
  14. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Vijay P, et al. : Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent, 28:215-235, 2003.
  15. Mjor I, Gordan V : Failure, repair, refurbishing and longevity of restorations. Oper Dent, 27:528-534, 2002.
  16. Prajapati D, Nayak R, Kamath P, et al.: Effect of resin infiltration on artificial caries: an in vitro evaluation of resin penetration and microhardness. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 10:250, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1445
  17. Kielbassa AM, Ulrich I, Werth VD, et al. : Resin infiltration of deproteinised natural occlusal subsurface lesions improves initial quality of fissure sealing. Int J Oral Sci, 9:117, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2017.15
  18. Korner P, El Gedaily M, Taubock TT, et al. : Margin integrity of conservative composite restorations after resin infiltration of demineralized enamel. J Adhes Dent, 19:483-489, 2017.
  19. Park SY, Jeong TS, Kim S : A study on the clinical usage of the flowable composite resin. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 29:255-261, 2002.
  20. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Wilkerson M, et al. : A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc, 129:567-577, 1998. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0274
  21. Kim YJ, Kwon TY : Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Six Flowable Composite Resins and a Conventional Composite Resin. Kor J Dent Mater, 43:159-165, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14815/kjdm.2016.43.2.159
  22. Ding Y, Yao H, Wang G, Song H : A randomized doubleblind placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of Clinpro XT varnish and Gluma dentin desensitizer on dentin hypersensitivity. Am J Dent, 27:79-83, 2014.
  23. Mitra SB, Lee CY, Rusin RP, et al. : Long-term adhesion and mechanism of bonding of a paste-liquid resin-modified glass-ionomer. Dent Mater, 25:459-466, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.09.008
  24. Choi K, Oshida Y, Yi K, et al. : Microtensile bond strength of glass ionomer cements to artificially created carious dentin. Oper Dent, 31:590-597, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2341/05-108
  25. Alves FBT, Hesse D, Loguercio AD, et al. : The bonding of glass ionomer cements to caries-affected primary tooth dentin. Pediatr Dent, 35:320-324, 2013.
  26. Burrow M, Nopnakeepong U, Phrukkanon S : A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin. Dent Mater, 18:239-245, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00041-0
  27. Carrera CA, Lan C, Aparicio C, et al. : The use of micro-CT with image segmentation to quantify leakage in dental restorations. Dent Mater, 31:382-390, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.002
  28. Coutinho E, Yoshida Y, Nakayama Y, et al. : Gel phase formation at resin-modified glass-ionomer/tooth interfaces. J Dent Res, 86:656-661, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910708600714
  29. Yiu C, Tay F, Neo J, et al. : Interaction of glass-ionomer cements with moist dentin. J Dent Res, 83:283-289, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300403
  30. Shafiei F, Yousefipour B, Farhadpour H : Marginal microleakage of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restoration: Interaction effect of delayed light activation and surface pretreatment. Dent Res J, 12:224, 2015.
  31. Parolia A, Adhauliya N, de Moraes Porto I, Mala K : A comparative evaluation of microleakage around class V cavities restored with different tooth colored restorative materials. Oral Health Dent Manag, 13:120-126, 2014.
  32. Nematollahi H, Bagherian A, Mehr MA, et al. : Microbial microleakage assessment of class V cavities restored with different materials and techniques: A laboratory study. Dent Res J, 14:344, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.215958
  33. Pereira AdFV, Poiate IAVP, Miranda Jr WG, et al. : Influence of restorative techniques on marginal adaptation and dye penetration around Class V restorations. Gen Dent, 60:17-21, 2012.
  34. Cho TS, Yoon JH, Kim SG, Lee SH : Ultra-structure and acid etching characteristics of occlusal fissure enamel. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 32:321-331, 2005.
  35. Arnold W, Haddad B, Danesh G, et al. : Enamel surface alterations after repeated conditioning with HCl. Head Face Med, 11:32, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-015-0089-2