한국심리학회지:학교 (Korean Journal of School Psychology)

학교심리학회 (Korean School Psychology Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

초등학생의 사회적 성취목표 유형에 따른 잠재집단 분류와 또래지위 및 공격성과의 관련성 탐색

Classifying the Latent Group of Elementary School Students Based on Social Achievement Goals Types and the Exploration of Peer Status and Aggression

  • 투고 : 2020.07.20
  • 심사 : 2020.08.17
  • 발행 : 2020.08.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 사회적 성취목표의 세 가지 유형을 기반으로 초등학생의 사회적 성취목표를 잠재집단으로 분류하고, 각 집단이 또래지위와 공격성에서 어떠한 차이점이 있는지를 탐색하는 것이다. 사회적 성취목표와 사이버 공격성은 자기보고 방식으로, 또래지위와 외현적 공격성과 대인관계 공격성은 또래지명 방식으로 측정하였다. 사회적 성취목표는 사회적 숙달목표와 사회적 수행접근목표, 사회적 수행회피목표로 나누었으며, 또래지위는 지각된 인기와 사회적 선호로, 공격성은 외현적 공격성, 대인관계 공격성, 사이버 공격성으로 구분하였다. 전체 연구 대상은 클래스넷 4차년도 자료 중 학년 비율을 고려해 무작위 추출한 초등학생 1,239명(남 633명, 여 606명)이다. 잠재프로파일 분석을 이용해 사회적 성취목표 유형을 분류한 결과 세 집단이 적합한 것으로 나타났다. 사회적 성취목표의 세 집단은 각각 '숙달지향 성취목표형(184명, 14.9%)', '평균 성취목표형(852명, 68.8%)', '고사회적 성취목표형(203명, 16.4%)'으로 명명되었다. 다항 로지스틱 회귀분석을 이용해 또래지위 및 공격성 간의 관련성을 살펴본 결과 1차 시기 사회적 선호가 높을수록 고사회적 성취목표형 집단에 속할 확률이 낮았고, 사이버 공격성이 높을수록 숙달지향 성취목표형 집단에 속할 확률이 낮았다. 또한 2차 시기 대인관계 공격성이 높을수록 평균 성취목표형 집단보다 고사회적 성취목표형 집단에 속할 확률이 높았다.

The purpose of this study was to explore the latent profiles of social achievement goals and to investigate the differences in peer status (perceived popularity, social preference) and aggression (overt, relational, cyber) among those profile groups. Social achievement goals and cyber aggression data was acquired through self-reporting, and perceived popularity, social preference, and overt and relational aggression were assessed through peer nomination. Applying the latent profile analysis(LPA) to 1,239 elementary school students, three distinct groups of social achievement goals were identified: a development-oriented achievement goal group, an average social goal group, and a overall-high social achievement goal group. Using logistic regression analysis, the relationships between the latent group, peer status, and aggression were examined. The result indicated that the higher the social preference, the lower the probability of belonging to the 'overall-high social achievement goal group'. And the higher the cyber aggression, the lower the probability of belonging to the 'development-oriented achievement goal group'. In addition, the higher the relational aggression of the second time, the higher the probability of belonging to the 'overall-high social achievement goal group' as compared to the 'average social goal group'.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 권재기 (2011). 집단따돌림 피해경험의 발달양상과 내면화-외현화 문제행동의 변화: 잠재계층 성장 분석(LCGA).다집단 성장혼합모형(GMM)을 이용한 종단연구. 한국아동복지학, 34, 96-127.
  2. 김진구 (2017). 초등학생의 또래생태에 대한 교사-학생 지지와 갈등의 조절효과: 공격성의 또래영향과 사회화를 중심으로. 건국대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  3. 문경숙, 박종효, 안해정, 최지영, 홍경화, 김진구, 최은영 (2018). 초등학생의 공격성 유형에 따른 잠재집단 분류 및 심리사회적 특성 탐색. 한국교육, 45(4), 35-59.
  4. 박종효, 문경숙, 안해정, 최지영, 홍경화, 김진구, 최은영 (2017). 사회연결망분석에 기초한 웹 기반 클래스넷(ClassNet) 프로그램 개발 연구. 교육과학연구, 48(3), 107-137.
  5. 박종효.최은영 (2017). 성장혼합모형을 활용한 청소년의 사이버 괴롭힘 피해경험의 발달 유형화와 전통적 괴롭힘과의 관련성 탐색. 열린교육연구, 25(4), 217-242.
  6. 안혜진 (2012). 성취목표에 대한 재개념화 모형 검증. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 박사학위 청구논문.
  7. 안혜진, 송인섭 (2012). 사회적 성취목표 척도의 타당화. 교육심리연구, 26(4), 853-875.
  8. 양하련, 이은주 (2014). 청소년의 사회적 성취 목표와 또래관계 질의 관계: 친사회성과 공격성의 매개효과. 중등교육연구, 62(1), 235-260. https://doi.org/10.25152/SER.2014.62.1.235
  9. 여태철, 김명섭 (2019). 또래 내 인기와 사회적 성취목표가 공격성에 미치는 영향: 성별 차이를 중심으로. 교육문화연구, 25(1), 577-595.
  10. 염혜선 (2018). 중학생의 4요인 사회적 성취목표 잠재프로파일 분류 및 사회적 적응 탐색. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 18(24), 179-198.
  11. 염혜선, 이은주 (2015). 사회적 및 학업적 맥락에서 유능감과 성취목표지향성, 학업성취, 또래관계 질의 구조적 관계. 교육심리연구, 29(2), 185-207.
  12. 염혜선, 이은주 (2016). 학업적, 사회적 성취목표지향성의 잠재프로파일에 따른 학업적, 사회적 적응의 차이. 교육심리연구, 30(1), 255-276.
  13. 염혜선, 이은주 (2018). 중학생의 또래관계 변화신념, 사회적 성취목표, 갈등해결전략, 또래관계 질 및 공격성의 관계. 교육심리연구, 32(2), 295-319.
  14. 최지영, 문경숙, 안해정, 홍경화, 김진구, 최은영, 박종효 (2018). 자기보고와 또래지명을 활용한 공격성 수준별 유형의 학교적응과 심리적 특성 탐색. The SNU Journal of Education Research, 27(3), 29-51.
  15. 한승수, 이은주 (2020). 사회적 목표의 잠재프로파일과 성취정서, 학업노력, 학업성취도의 구조적 관계. 한국청소년연구, 31(1), 235-264.
  16. Andreou, E. (2006). Social preference, perceived popularity and social intelligence: Relations to overt and relational aggression. School Psychology International, 27(3), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034306067286
  17. Ang, R. P., & Goh, D. H. (2010). Cyberbullying among adolescents: The role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 41, 387-397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-010-0176-3
  18. van den Berg, Y. H. M., Burk, W. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2015). Identifying subtypes of peer status by combining popularity and preference: A cohort-sequential approach. Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(8), 1108-1137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614554704
  19. Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00900.x
  20. Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52-72). New York, NY: Guilford.
  21. Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle: A reissue. New York: Norton
  22. Garandeau, C. F., Ahn, H. J., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). The social status of aggressive students across contexts: The role of classroom status hierarchy, academic achievement, and grade. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1699-1710. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025271
  23. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3301_1
  24. Hawley, P. H. (2013). Social dominance in childhood and adolescence: Why social competence and aggression may go hand in hand. In P. H. Hawley, T. D. Little, & P. C. Rodkin (Eds.), Aggression and adaptation: The bright side to bad behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  25. Hinduja, S. & Patchin, J. W. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4, 123-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006286287
  26. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W.(2014). Bullying: Beyond the school yard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Cor-win Press.
  27. Huesmann, L. R., Eron, L. D., Guerra, N. G., & Crawshaw, V. B. (1994). Measuring children's aggression with teachers' predictions of peer nominations. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 329-336. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.329
  28. Jung, T., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 302-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x
  29. Kowalski, R., Giummetti, G., Schroeder, A., & Lattanner, M. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 1-61.
  30. Lee, H. Y., & Yeager, D. S. (2020). Adolescents with an entity theory of personality are more vigilant to social status and use relational aggression to maintain social status. Social Development, 29(1), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12393
  31. Lee, J. (2018). Social Achievement Goals and Social Adjustment in Adolescence: A Multiple-Goal. Perspective. Japanese Psychological Research, 60(3), 121-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12189
  32. Logis, H. A., Rodkin, P. C., Gest, S. D., & Ahn, H. J. (2013). Popularity as an organizing factor of preadolescent friendship networks: Beyond prosocial and aggressive behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 413-423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12033
  33. Marsh, H. W., Ludtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person-and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(2), 191-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510902751010
  34. Mouratidis, A. A., & Sideridis, G. D. (2009). On social achievement goals: Their relations with peer acceptance, classroom belongingness, and perceptions of loneliness. The Journal of Experimental Education, 77(3), 285-308. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.77.3.285-308
  35. Murray-Close, D., & Ostrov, J. M. (2009). A longitudinal study of forms and functions of aggressive behavior in early childhood. Child Development, 80(3), 828-842. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01300.x
  36. Muthen, B., & Muthen, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variablecentered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24(6), 882-891. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02070.x
  37. Ojanen, T., Gronroos, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2005). An interpersonal circumplex model of children's social goals: Links with peer-reported behavior and sociometric status. Developmental Psychology, 41, 699-710. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.5.699
  38. Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36(2), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20336
  39. Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.36.1.14
  40. Rodkin, P. C., Ryan, A. M., Jamison, R., & Wilson, T. (2013). Social goals, social behavior, and social status in middle childhood. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1139-1150. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029389
  41. Ryan, A. M., & Hopkins, N. B. (2003). Achievement goals in the social domain. University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign.
  42. Ryan, A. M., & Shim, S. S. (2006). Social achievement goals: The nature and consequences of different orientations toward social competence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1246-1263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206289345
  43. Ryan, A. M., & Shim, S. S. (2008). An exploration of young adolescents' social achievement goals and social adjustment in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 672-687. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.672
  44. Ryan, A. M., & Shin, H. (2018). Peers, academics, and teachers. In W. M. Bukowski, B.Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds.). Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups(pp. 637-656). (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
  45. Ryan, A. M., Hicks, L., & Midgley, C. (1997). Social goals, and avoiding seeking help in the classroom. Journal of Early Adolescence, 17, 152-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431697017002003
  46. Ryan, A. M., Jamison, R. S., Shin, H., & Thompson, G. N. (2012). Social achievement goals and adjustment at school during early adolescence. In A. M. Ryan, & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships and adjustment at school (pp. 165-186). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  47. Shim, S. S., & Ryan, A. M. (2012). What do students want socially when they arrive at college? Implications of social achievement goals for social behaviors and adjustment during the first semester of college. Motivation and Emotion, 36(4), 504-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9272-3
  48. Sijtsema, J. J., Ojanen, T., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Hawley, P. H., & Little, T. D. (2010). Forms and functions of aggression in adolescent friendship selection and influence: A longitudinal social network analysis. Social Development, 19(3), 515-534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00566.x
  49. Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.202
  50. Willard, N. (2006). Cyberbullying and Cyberthreat: Responding to the Challenge of Online Social Aggression, Threats, and Distress. Eugene, OR: Center for the Safe and Responsible Internet Use.
  51. Wright, M. F. (2014). Longitudinal investigation of the associations between adolescents' popularity and cyber social behaviors. Journal of School Violence, 13(3), 291-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2013.849201