DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of College-Language Small Group Cooperative Learning on English Reading Comprehension, English Reading Motivation and Cooperative Learning Awareness

대학 교양영어 소집단 협동학습이 영어독해력, 영어읽기동기, 협동학습인식에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2020.04.07
  • Accepted : 2020.06.20
  • Published : 2020.06.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of group co-learning on English reading ability and motivation and the change in group co-learning perception after planning and applying a group co-study class program that can be applied in university liberal arts English class. In order to achieve this goal, the experiment team (34 students) conducted the class from September 2 to December 13, 2019 for 62 freshmen who participated in the compulsory liberal arts English class at the four-year university in North Chungcheong Province, and the control team (28 students) conducted the class as a typical lecture class based on the basis of cooperative learning. The English proficiency of the learners was approached by dividing the area of academic proficiency into English reading skills and the area of justice into English reading motivations. The pre-experimental learners' English reading skills were measured by excerpting the national level educational achievement assessment (high 2). The research results are as follows. First, it was shown that the English reading ability score of a group that applied group cooperative learning and the English reading ability score of a group that did not apply group cooperative learning were statistically significant differences. Second, there was a difference between the English reading motivation score of the group applying the convocation group cooperative learning and the English reading motivation score of the group not applied. Third, the change in the perception of groups applying the convocation group cooperative learning occurred before and after the experiment. This study found that the awareness of English reading, English reading motivation, and cooperative learning increased through cooperative learning among university students during liberal arts English classes, which has a positive effect on self-identity and so on.

본 연구 목적은 대학 교양영어 수업에 활용 가능한 소집단 협동학습 수업 프로그램을 적용하여 소집단 협동학습이 영어 독해력과 영어 읽기동기에 미치는 영향과 소집단 협동학습 인식변화를 분석하는데 있다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위해, 충청북도의 4년제 종합대학교의 필수 교양영어 수업에 참여한 신입생 62명을 연구대상으로 2019년 9월 2일에서 12월 13일까지 실험반(34명)은 협동학습을 기반으로 한 맞춤식 소집단 협동학습으로 수업을 진행하고, 통제반(28명)은 전형적인 강의식 수업으로 진행하였다. 학습자들의 영어 능력은 학업 숙달도 영역을 영어 독해력으로, 정의적 영역은 영어 읽기 동기로 나누어 실험하였으며 실험 전 학습자들의 영어 독해력은 국가 수준 교육 성취도 평가문제를 발췌하여 측정하였다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 소집단 협동학습을 적용한 집단의 영어 독해력 점수와 소집단 협동학습을 적용하지 않은 집단의 영어독해력 점수는 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 있다는 것을 발견하였다. 둘째, 소집단 협동학습을 적용한 집단의 영어 읽기동기 점수와 적용하지 않은 집단의 영어 읽기동기점수는 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 있다는 것을 발견하였다. 셋째, 소집단 협동학습을 적용한 집단의 인식변화가 실험 전과 실험 후에 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 있다는 것을 발견하였다. 본 연구는 대학 교양영어 수업 시 대학생들 간의 협동학습을 통해 영어 독해력, 영어 읽기동기, 협동학습 인식이 상승했으며, 이를 통한 자아정체성, 자신감 등에 긍정적 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. Kwon, J. Lee, S. Han, & S. Bhang. (2017). A Study on Utilization of e-learning in General Education at University Level : Focus on Contents Sharing among Universities, Korean Journal of General Education, 6(1), 9-32. DOI : 10.31888/JKGS.2017.7.1.289
  2. I. Lee. (2002). "e-learning", Muneumsa.
  3. J. Kim. (2016). Design and Development of English e-Learning Content to Facilitate Interaction, Korea Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 11(4), 863-891. DOI:10.31888/JKGS.2016.62.1.317
  4. P. M. Kim. (2017). Learner Attitudes, Perceptions, and Beliefs in Language Learning, Foreign Language Annals, 45, S98-S117. DOI : 10.31888/JKGS.2017.25.4.219
  5. E. K. Seo. (2018). The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students, The Modern Language Journal, 72(3), 283-294. DOI : 10.31888/JKGS.2018.30.4.1409
  6. R. L. Hong. (2016). University students' beliefs about learning English and French in Lebanon, System, 34(1), 80-96. DOI : 15.31998/JKGS.2016.5.3.219 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.014
  7. E. K. Hwang. (2015). Using student beliefs about language learning and teaching in the foreign language methods course, Foreign Language Annals, 18(4), 333-340. DOI : 11.21008/JKGS.2015.23.1.038 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1985.tb01811.x
  8. E. K. Lee. Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners' beliefs about language learning: a review of BALLI studies, System, 27(4), 557-576, 9. DOI : 11.26381/JKGS.2017.6.2.364 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00050-0
  9. K. Kim. (2017). Language learning belief factors affecting English achievement, English Teaching, 67(4), 173-194. DOI : 11.33385/JKGS.2017.8.1.449 https://doi.org/10.15858/ENGTEA.67.4.201212.173
  10. Y. M. Son & B. S. Jung, (2017). Convergence Development of Video and E-learning System for Education Disabled Students, Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 6(4), 113-119. DOI:11.81442/JKGS.2017.32.2.369 https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2015.6.4.113
  11. J. T Kim. (2017). The Development and Validation of a Mobile-based English Speaking Test Convergence Model, Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 7(2), 25-31. DOI : 13.21009/JKGS.2017.7.8.324 https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2016.7.2.025
  12. Greive, D. (2018). Teaching strategies and techniques for adjunct faculty, ERIC document reproduction service(ED 428 804).
  13. Cameron. B. (2019). Active learning, Halifax, Canada: Society for Teaching Learning in Higher Education.
  14. Mc Keachie, W. (2012). Active learning: cooperative, collaborative, and pee learning, In W. McKeachie, McKeachie's teaching tips: strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers, Boston; Houghton Mifflin Company, 187-195.
  15. B, Min. (2016). Syntactic and lexical/semantic skill in foreign language reading: importance and interaction, Modern Language Journal, 70,. 343-349. DOI:11.32018/JKGS.2016.12.2.187 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05286.x
  16. M. Park. (2017). Sentence-level expectancy as an aide to advanced reading, TESOL Quarterly, 7(3), 269-277. DOI : 11.36853/JKGS.2017.7.3.269 https://doi.org/10.2307/3585675