DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Impact of Input and Output Tariffs on Domestic Employment across Industries: Evidence from Korea

  • Jang, Yong Joon (Department of International Business and Trade, Kyung Hee University)
  • Received : 2020.09.11
  • Accepted : 2020.12.15
  • Published : 2020.12.31

Abstract

Purpose - This paper examines how differently output and input tariffs affect domestic employment across industrial characteristics of comparative advantage such as labor quality and capital intensity. Design/methodology - The paper focuses on 453 Korean industries from 2007 to 2014 because Korea is a typical example of a natural resource-scarce open economy and experienced the transition of the export pattern from labor intensity to technology intensity during this period. Findings - The results show that input tariff reduction stimulated total employment, focusing on the early 2010s, while the effects of output tariff reduction were statistically insignificant in general. However, the stimulation effects of output tariff reduction on employment were found in comparative advantage industries with greater labor quality and capital intensity. As for input tariff reduction, its stimulation effects on employment were more prominent in comparative disadvantage industries with lower labor quality and capital intensity. Originality/value - These results provide significant implications for natural resource-scarce open economies which are experiencing the transition of the export pattern from labor intensity to technology intensity and the unequal distribution of income after trade liberalization: imported intermediate inputs has become increasing important, leading to trade effects on employment and alleviation of income inequality.

Keywords

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., D. Autor, D. Dorn, G. Hanson and B. Price (2016), "Import Competition and the Great US Employment Sag of the 2000s", Journal of Labor Economics, 34(1), 141-198.
  2. Amiti, M. and J. Konings (2007), "Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia", American Economic Review, 97(5), 1611-1638. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.5.1611
  3. Arellano, M. and S. Bond (1991), "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations", Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 227-297.
  4. Aw, B., S. Chung and M. Robers (2000), "Productivity and Turnover in the Export Market: Micro-level Evidence from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan (China)", World Bank Economic Review, 41(1), 65-90.
  5. Bae, Chan-Kwon, J. Kim, H. Keum and Y. Jang (2012), The Impact of Free Trade Agreements on Economic Performance in Korea (Policy Analyses, No. 12-03), Sejong, Korea: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
  6. Baier, S. and J. Bergstrand (2007), "Does Free Trade Actually Increase Members' International Trade?", Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005
  7. Bernard, A., J. Eaton, B. Jensen and S. Kortum (2003), "Plants and Productivity in International Trade", American Economics Review, 93(4), 1268-1290. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803769206296
  8. Bernard, A., S. Redding, S. and P. Schott (2007), "Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms", Review of Economic Studies, 74(1), 31-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00413.x
  9. Cameron, A. and P. Trivedi, P. (2005), Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Costinot, A. (2009), "On the Origins of Comparative Advantage", Journal of International Economics, 77(2), 255-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2009.01.007
  11. De Hoyos, R. and L. Iacovone (2013), "Economic Performance under NAFTA: A Firm-Level Analysis of the Trade-Productivity Linkages", World Development, 44(C), 180-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.09.008
  12. Feng, L., Z. Li and D. Swenson (2016), "The Connection between Imported Intermediate Inputs and Exports: Evidence from Chinese Firms", Journal of International Economics, 101(c), 86-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.03.004
  13. Fernandes, A. (2007), "Trade Policy, Trade Volumes and Plant-level Productivity in Colombian Manufacturing Industries", Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 52-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.03.003
  14. Goldberg, P., A. Khandelwal, N. Pavcnik and P. Topalova, P. (2010), "Imported Intermediate Inputs and Domestic Product Growth: Evidence from India", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(4), 1727-1767. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.4.1727
  15. Hahn, Chin-Hee (2004), Exporting and Performance of Plants: Evidence from Korean Manufacturing (NBER Working Paper, No. 10208), Cambridge, MA: NBER.
  16. Jang, Yong-Joon, M. Cho and H. Kim (2015), "Trade Liberalization and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Korea", Journal of Korea Trade, 19(4), 21-41.
  17. Kasahara, H. and J. Rodrigue (2008), "Does the Use of Imported Intermediates Increase Productivity? Plant-level Evidence", Journal of Development Economics, 87(1), 106-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.12.008
  18. Kim, Bae-Geun. (2014), "An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of a Change in Market Structure on Production and Employment in the Korean Economy", Journal of Economic Theory and Econometrics, 25(2), 1-39.
  19. Kim, Young-Gui, J. Kang, H. Kim and H. Hyun (2011), A Study on the Determinants and Productivity Spillover Effects of Korea's Intermediate Goods Trade (Policy Analyses, No. 11-13), Sejong, Korea: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
  20. Kim, Young-Gui, H. Park, H. Keum and S. Lee (2017), "Determinants of Korea's Import Structure and Its Effects on Firm's Distribution", World Economy Brief, 7(21).
  21. Kletzer, L. (2001), Measuring the Costs of Trade-Related Job Loss, Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  22. Leontief, W. (1953), "Domestic Production and Foreign Trade: The American Capital Position Reexamined", Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 97, 332-349.
  23. Liu, Q. and L. Qiu (2016), "Intermediate Input Imports and Innovations: Evidence from Chinese Firms' Patent Filings", Journal of International Economics, 103(c), 166-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.09.009
  24. Luong, T. (2011), "The Impact of Input and Output Tariffs on Firms' Productivity: Theory and Evidence", Review of International Economics, 19(5), 821-835. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2011.00988.x
  25. Ma, Y. and F. Dei (2009), "Product Quality, Wage Inequality and Trade Liberalization", Review of International Economics, 17, 244-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2009.00821.x
  26. MacDonald, J. (1994), "Does Import Competition Force Efficient Production?", Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(4), 721-727. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109773
  27. Pavcnik, N. (2002), "Trade Liberalization, Exit and Productivity Improvements: Evidence from Chilean Plants", Review of Economic Studies, 69(1), 245-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00205
  28. Rose, S. (2018), Is Foreign Trade the Cause of Manufacturing Job Losses?, Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
  29. Song, S. (2018), Establishment Size and Wage Inequality: The Roles of Performance Pay and Rent Sharing (BOK Working Paper, No. 2018-4), Seoul: Bank of Korea.
  30. Topalova, P. and A. Khandelwal (2011), "Trade Liberalization and Firm Productivity: The Case of India", Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(3), 995-1009. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00095
  31. Trefler, D. (1993), "International Factor Price Differences: Leontief Was Right!", Journal of Political Economy, 101(6), 961-987. https://doi.org/10.1086/261911
  32. Whang, Un-Jung, S. Lee, H. Kim and Y. Kang (2017), The Employment Effects of Exports (Policy Analyses, No. 17-18), Sejong, Korea: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
  33. Whang, Uu-Jung (2019), "Exports and Job Creation in South Korea: industry-level analysis", Journal of Korea Trade, 23(1), 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKT-05-2018-0042
  34. Yu, M. (2014), "Processing Trade, Tariff Reductions and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Firms", Economic Journal, 125(585), 943-988. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12127

Cited by

  1. Does Inward Foreign Direct Investment Affect Productivity across Industries in Korea? vol.25, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.11644/kiep.eaer.2021.25.2.394