DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A lower cost method of preparing corn stover for Irpex lacteus treatment by ensiling with lactic acid bacteria

  • Zuo, Sasa (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Jiang, Di (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Niu, Dongze (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Zheng, Mingli (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Tao, Ya (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Xu, Chuncheng (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2019.04.24
  • Accepted : 2019.09.18
  • Published : 2020.08.01

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated a method of preparing corn stover for Irpex lacteus (I. lacteus) treatment to improve its in vitro rumen degradability under non-sterile conditions. Methods: Corn stover was inoculated with Lactobacillus plantarum (L. plantarum), Lactobacillus buchneri (L. buchneri), and an equal mixture of these strains, and ensiled for 0, 3, 7, 14, and 28 days. After each period, a portion of the silage was sampled to assess the silage quality, and another portion of the silage was further treated with I. lacteus at 28℃ for 28 d. All the samples were analyzed for fermentation quality, chemical composition, and in vitro gas production (IVGP) as a measure of rumen fermentation capacity. Results: Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) was found to improve the silage quality of the corn stover, and the corn stover silage inoculated with L. plantarum produced more lactic acid and higher IVGP than other silage groups. The I. lacteus colonies flourished in the early stage of corn stover silage, especially on the 3-d corn stover silage inoculated with both L. plantarum and L. buchneri. This led to an 18% decrease in the acid detergent lignin content, and a 49.6% increase in IVGP compared with the raw stover. Conclusion: The combination of ensiling with the mixed LAB inoculation and I. lacteus treatment provided a cost-effective method for the improvement of the IVGP of corn stover from 164.8 mL/g organic matter (OM) to 246.6 mL/g OM.

Keywords

References

  1. Van Kuijk SJA, Sonnenberg ASM, Baars JJP, Hendriks WH, Cone JW. Fungal treated lignocellulosic biomass as ruminant feed ingredient: a review. Biotechnol Adv 2015;33:191-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.10.014
  2. Chaturvedi V, Verma P. An overview of key pretreatment processes employed for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass into biofuels and value added products. 3 Biotech 2013;3:415-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-013-0167-8
  3. Vasco-Correa J, Ge X, Li Y. Fungal pretreatment of non-sterile miscanthus for enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol 2016;203:118-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.018
  4. Song L, Yu H, Ma F, Zhang X. Biological pretreatment under non-sterile conditions for enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. BioResources 2013;8:3802-16. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.8.3.3802-3816
  5. Liu S, Li X, Wu S, et al. Fungal pretreatment by Phanerochaete chrysosporium for enhancement of biogas production from corn stover silage. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2014;174:1907-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-1185-7
  6. Thomsen ST, Londono JE, Ambye-Jensen M, Heiske S, Kadar Z, Meyer AS. Combination of ensiling and fungal delignification as effective wheat straw pretreatment. Biotechnol Biofuels 2016;9:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0437-x
  7. Zheng ML, Niu DZ, Jiang D, Zuo SS, Xu CC. Dynamics of microbial community during ensiling direct-cut alfalfa with and without LAB inoculant and sugar. J Appl Microbiol 2017;122:1456-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13456
  8. Shrestha S, Fonoll X, Khanal SK, Raskin L. Biological strategies for enhanced hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass during anaerobic digestion: current status and future perspectives. Bioresour Technol 2017;245:1245-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.089
  9. Xu Z, He H, Zhang S, Kong J. Effects of inoculants Lactobacillus brevis and Lactobacillus parafarraginis on the fermentation characteristics and microbial communities of corn stover silage. Sci Rep 2017;7:13614. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14052-1
  10. Johnston SR, Boddy L, Weightman AJ. Bacteria in decomposing wood and their interactions with wood-decay fungi. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2016;92:fiw179. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw179
  11. Xu C, Ma F, Zhang X. Lignocellulose degradation and enzyme production by Irpex lacteus CD2 during solid-state fermentation of corn stover. J Biosci Bioeng 2009;108:372-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2009.04.023
  12. Zuo S, Niu D, Zheng M, et al. Effect of Irpex lacteus, Pleurotus ostreatus and Pleurotus cystidiosus pretreatment of corn stover on its improvement of the in vitro rumen fermentation. J Sci Food Agric 2018;98:4287-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8951
  13. Xu C, Cai Y, Moriya N, Ogawa M. Nutritive value for ruminants of green tea grounds as a replacement of brewers' grains in totally mixed ration silage. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2007;138:228-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.11.014
  14. Owens VN, Albrecht KA, Muck RE, Duke SH. Protein degradation and fermentation characteristics of red clover and alfalfa silage harvested with varying levels of total nonstructural carbohydrates. Crop Sci 1999;39:1873-80. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961873x
  15. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74:3583-97. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  16. Van Kuijk SJA, Sonnenberg ASM, Baars JJP, Hendriks WH, Cone JW. Fungal treatment of lignocellulosic biomass: Importance of fungal species, colonization and time on chemical composition and in vitro rumen degradability. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2015;209:40-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.07.026
  17. Menke KH, Steingass H. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Dev 1988;28:7-55.
  18. Weinberg ZG, Muck RE. New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1996;19:53-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-6445(96) 00025-3
  19. Filya I. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri, with or without homofermentative lactic acid bacteria, on the fermentation, aerobic stability and ruminal degradability of wheat, sorghum and maize silages. J Appl Microbiol 2003;95:1080-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02081.x
  20. Muck RE. Silage microbiology and its control through additives. Rev Bras Zootec 2010;39:183-91. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010001300021
  21. Ennahar S, Cai Y, Fujita Y. Phylogenetic diversity of lactic acid bacteria associated with paddy rice silage as determined by 16S ribosomal DNA analysis. Appl Environ Microb 2003;69:444-51. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.1.444-451.2003
  22. Weinberg ZG, Ashbell G, Hen Y, Azrieli A. The effect of cellulase and hemicellulase plus pectinase on the aerobic stability and fibre analysis of peas and wheat silages. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1995;55:287-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00785-L
  23. Borras E, Caminal G, Sarra M, Novotny C. Effect of soil bacteria on the ability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) removal by Trametes versicolor and Irpex lacteus from contaminated soil. Soil Biol Biochem 2010;42:2087-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.08.003
  24. Yahaya M, Kimura A, Harai J, et al. Effect of length of ensiling on silo degradation and digestibility of structural carbohydrates of lucerne and orchardgrass. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2001;92:141-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00265-6
  25. Rooke JA, Hatfield RD. Biochemistry of ensiling. In: Buxton D, Muck R, Harrison J, Editors. Silage science and technology. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy; 2003. pp. 95-139.
  26. Driehuis F, Oude Elferink SJWH, Van Wikselaar PG. Fermentation characteristics and aerobic stability of grass silage inoculated with Lactobacillus buchneri, with or without homofermentative lactic acid bacteria. Grass Forage Sci 2001;56:330-43. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2494.2001.00282.x
  27. Weinberg ZG, Szakacs G, Ashbell G, Hen Y. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and L. plantarum, applied at ensiling, on the ensiling fermentation and aerobic stability of wheat and sorghum silages. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 1999;23:218-22. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jim.2900726
  28. Contreras-Govea FE, Muck RE, Broderick GA, Weimer PJ. Lactobacillus plantarum effects on silage fermentation and in vitro microbial yield. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2013;179:61-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.11.008
  29. Cone JW, Van Gelder AH, Visscher GJW, Oudshoorn L. Influence of rumen fluid and substrate concentration on fermentation kinetics measured with a fully automated time related gas production apparatus. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1996;61:113-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(96)00950-9
  30. Zuo S, Niu D, Jiang D, et al. Effect of white-rot fungal treatments on the in vitro rumen degradability of two kinds of corn stover. BioResources 2019;14:895-907.