Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Military Leader's Behavioral Integrity on the Subordinate's Change-Oriented OCB : Focusing on the Moderating Effect of LMX

군 조직 리더의 언행일치가 구성원의 변화지향적 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향 : LMX의 조절효과를 중심으로

  • Hax, Sun-Bok (Sun-Bok Ha Assistant Professor, Department of Military Art & Science, Kyungnam University)
  • Received : 2020.02.21
  • Accepted : 2020.05.20
  • Published : 2020.05.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of leader' behavioral integrity on subordinate's change-oriented OCB via their team commitment along with the moderating effect of LMX. For this, 395 soldiers from military organizations where external factors were relatively well controlled besides their personal characteristics were selected and surveyed using hierarchical regression methods. First, the results showed that leader' behavioral integrity was positively related to subordinate's change-oriented OCB. Second, the positive relationship between leader' behavioral integrity and subordinate's change-oriented OCB was mediated by team commitment. Third, the aforementioned mediated relationship was moderated by LMX. Although this study targeted members of military organizations with more restrictions on behavior than private organizations, such as corporations, it could be meaningful in that it confirmed that the leader's behavioral integrity lead to subordinate's voluntary behavior of change-oriented OCB, which should be followed by efforts to make it more general by comparing a variety of public and business organizations.

본 연구의 목적은 리더의 언행일치가 부하의 팀몰입을 매개로 하여 부하의 변화지향적 조직시민행동에 영향을 미치는가와 더불어, 그 관계가 리더와 부하의 LMX에 의해 조절되는가를 실증하는 것이다. 이를 위해, 개인특성 이외에 개인의 행동에 영향을 미칠 수 있는 다른 외부요인들이 비교적 잘 통제되어 있는 군 조직의 장병 395명을 대상으로 우편 및 방문 등의 방법을 이용하여 설문조사를 하였으며, 주로 위계적 회귀분석을 이용하여 실증하였다. 그 결과, 첫째, 리더의 언행일치가 부하의 변화지향적 조직시민행동에 유의미한 긍정적 영향을 미쳤음이 검증되었다. 둘째, 리더의 언행일치와 부하의 변화지향적 조직시민행동의 관계를 부하의 팀몰입이 부분매개 한다는 것이 실증되었다. 셋째, 리더와 부하의 LMX에 따라 리더의 언행일치가 부하의 팀몰입에 다른 영향을 미쳤음이 확인되었다. 본 연구는 기업 등의 민간조직에 비해 행동에 제약이 많은 군 조직의 구성원들을 대상으로 했음에도 불구하고 리더의 언행일치가 부하의 변화지향적 조직시민행동이라는 자발적 행동을 이끌어낸다는 결과를 확인했다는 점에서 그 의의를 찾을 수 있을 것이며, 이러한 결과는 향후 여러 공조직과 더불어 다양한 산업군의 기업조직을 비교해 봄으로써 보다 일반화하는 노력이 후속되어야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. T. Simons. (1999). Behavioral integrity as a critical ingredient for transformational leadership. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(2), 89-104. DOI : 10.1108/09534819910263640
  2. A. L. Davis & H. R. Rothstein. (2006). The effects of the perceived behavioral integrity of managers on employee attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 407-419. DOI : 10.1007/s10551-006-9034-4
  3. T. Simons, H. Leroy, V. Collewaert & S. Masschelein. (2015). How leader alignment of words and deeds affects followers: A meta-analysis of behavioral integrity research. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4), 831-844. DOI : 10.1007/s10551-014-2332-3
  4. J. H. Shin & J. K. Tak. (2011). The Effects of Behavioral Integrity and Leader Legitimacy Perception on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment: The Moderating Effects of Supervisor's Collaborative Communication and Follower's Conscientiousness. The Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 385-407. DOI : 10.24230/ksiop.24.2.201105.385
  5. D. S. Chiaburu, I. S. Oh, J. Wang & A. C. Stoverink. (2017). A bigger piece of the pie: The relative importance of affiliative and change-oriented citizenship and task performance in predicting overall job performance. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), 97-107. DOI : 10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.006
  6. L. A. Bettencourt. (2004). Change-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors: The direct and moderating influence of goal orientation. Journal of Retailing, 80(3), 165-180. DOI : 10.1016/j.jretai.2003.12.001
  7. J. N. Choi. (2007). Change‐oriented organizational citizenship behavior: effects of work environment characteristics and intervening psychological processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 28(4), 467-484. DOI : 10.1002/job.433
  8. L. Van Dyne, L. L. Cummings & J. M. Parks. (1995). Extra role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity. In L. L. Curamings & B. M. Staw (eds.), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 17, Greenwich, CT : JAL, 215-285. DOI : 10.1177/017084068100200307
  9. B. J. Prak & S. Y. Son. (2017). The Effect of CEO Korean Leadership on Firm Performance : Testing the Mediation Effect of Affective Commitment. Leadership Research, 8(3), 5-31. DOI : 10.22243/tklq.2017.8.3.5
  10. K. Baik. (2014). Exploring the Mediating Variables on the Relationship between Issue Leadership and Outcome Variables. Leadership Research, 5(2), 133-153.
  11. K. Bae. (2015). Influence of Leader's Performance Management Coaching on Team Members' Performance through Commitment and Positive Psychological Capitals: Based on Multi-Level Approach. Leadership Research, 6(1), 123-156.
  12. S. H. Sang & W. Jeung. (2015). The Effects of Empowering Leadership on Team Performance: The Mediating Effects of Team Efficacy and Team Commitment. Leadership Research, 6(3), 125-150.
  13. B. Mahembe & A. S. Engelbrecht. (2013). The relationship between servant leadership, affective team commitment and team effectiveness. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(1), 1-10. DOI : 10.4102/sajhrm.v11i1.495
  14. Y. Shin, W. K. Oh, C. H. S. Sim & J. Y. Lee. (2016). A multilevel study of supportive leadership and individual work outcomes: The mediating roles of team cooperation, job satisfaction, and team commitment. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 32(1), 55-70. DOI : 10.19030/jabr.v32i1.9523
  15. D. J. Prottas. (2008). Perceived behavioral integrity: Relationships with employee attitudes, well-being, and absenteeism. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 313-322. DOI : 10.1007/s10551-007-9496-z
  16. T. Simons, R. Friedman, L. A. Liu & J. McLean Parks. (2007). Racial differences in sensitivity to behavioral integrity: Attitudinal consequences, in-group effects, and" trickle down" among Black and non-Black employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 650-665. DOI : 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.650
  17. R. Friedman, Y. Y. Hong, T. Simons, S. C. Chi, S. H. Oh & M. Lachowicz. (2018). The impact of culture on reactions to promise breaches: Differences between East and West in behavioral integrity perceptions. Group & Organization Management, 43(2), 273-315. DOI : 10.1177/1059601116678101
  18. F. Dansereau Jr, G. Graen & W. J. Haga. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational behavior and human performance, 13(1), 46-78. DOI : 10.1016/0030-5073(75)90005-7
  19. R. Kannan-Narasimhan & B. S. Lawrence. (2012). Behavioral integrity: How leader referents and trust matter to workplace outcomes. Journal of business ethics, 111(2), 165-178. DOI : 10.1007/s10551-011-1199-9
  20. H. Erkutlu & J. Chafra. (2016). Impact of behavioral integrity on organizational identification. Management Research Review, 39(6), 672-691. DOI : 10.1108/mrr-01-2015-0011
  21. J. H. Fritz, N. B. O'Neil, A. M. Popp, C. Williams & R. C. Arnett. (2013). The influence of supervisory behavioral integrity on intent to comply with organizational ethical standards and organizational commitment. Journal of business ethics, 114(2), 251-263. DOI : 10.1007/s10551-012-1345-z
  22. J. P. Wanous, T. D. Poland, S. L. Premack & K. S. Davis. (1992). The effects of met expectations on newcomer attitudes and behaviors: a review and meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 77(3), 288-297. DOI : 10.1037/0021-9010.77.3.288
  23. H. Leroy, M. E. Palanski & T. Simons. (2012). Authentic leadership and behavioral integrity as drivers of follower commitment and performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 255-264. DOI : 10.1007/s10551-011-1036-1
  24. J. P. Meyer & M. Gagne. (2008). Employee engagement from a self-determination theory perspective. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 60-62. DOI : 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00010.x
  25. J. P. Meyer, T. E. Becker & R. Van Dick. (2006). Social identities and commitments at work: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(5), 665-683. DOI : 10.1002/job.383
  26. J. W. Bishop & K. D. Scott. (2000). An examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 439-450. DOI : 10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.439
  27. J. R. Han.(2016). The Effects of Shared Leadership on Team Performance and Team Commitment of Team-Based Learning in Nursing Students: Mediating Effects of Team Trust. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(12), 303-311. DOI : 10.14400/jdc.2016.14.12.303
  28. R. T. Mowday, L. W. Porter & R. Steers. (1982). Organizational linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. DOI : 10.1016/b978-0-12-509370-5.50010-1
  29. J. Hyun. (2008). Team change and turnover intentions: The role of team and organizational commitment . HRD Research, 10(3), 1-21.
  30. E,. G. Kang & S. K. Lee. (2017). A Study on the effect of Perceived Organizational Support to Organizational Citizenship Behavior in the convergence age. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(9), 99-110. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2017.15.9.99
  31. Y. Wiener. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Academy of management review, 7(3), 418-428. DOI : 10.5465/amr.1982.4285349
  32. C. A. O'Reilly, & J. Chatman. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of applied psychology, 71(3), 492-499. DOI : 10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.492
  33. R. C. Mayer & F. D. Schoorman. (1992). Predicting participation and production outcomes through a two-dimensional model of organizational commitment. Academy of Management journal, 35(3), 671-684. DOI : 10.2307/256492
  34. J. C. Munene. (1995). 'Not-on-seat': An Investigation of Some Correlates of Organisational Citizenship Behaviour in Nigeria. Applied psychology, 44(2), 111-122. DOI : 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1995.tb01069.x
  35. C. L. Pearce & P. A. Herbik. (2004). Citizenship behavior at the team level of analysis: The effects of team leadership, team commitment, perceived team support, and team size. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(3), 293-310. DOI : 10.3200/socp.144.3.293-310
  36. J. H. Dulebohn, W. H. Bommer, R. C. Liden, R. L. Brouer & G. R. Ferris. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of management, 38(6), 1715-1759. DOI : 10.1177/0149206311415280
  37. S. K. Shin. (2018). The Effect of Job Demands on Social Worker's Organizational Commitment: The Moderating of Leader-Member Exchange. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(9), 443-452. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2018.16.9.443
  38. R. Eisenberger, R. Huntington, S. Hutchison & D. Sowa. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied psychology, 71(3), 500-507. DOI : 10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
  39. A. J. Kinicki & R. P. Vecchio. (1994). Influences on the quality of supervisor-subordinate relations: The role of time‐pressure, organizational commitment, and locus of control. Journal of organizational behavior, 15(1), 75-82. DOI : 10.1002/job.4030150108
  40. J. J. Jordan, R. Sommers, P. Bloom & D. G. Rand. (2017). Why do we hate hypocrites? Evidence for a theory of false signaling. Psychological science, 28(3), 356-368. DOI : 10.1177/0956797616685771
  41. T. Simons. (2002). Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers' words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13(1), 18-35. DOI : 10.1287/orsc.13.1.18.543
  42. M. C. Schippers, D. N. Den Hartog, P. L. Koopman & J. A. Wienk. (2003). Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 24(6), 779-802. DOI : 0.1002/job.220 https://doi.org/10.1002/job.220
  43. R. C. Liden & J. M. Maslyn. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of management, 24(1), 43-72. DOI : 10.1016/s0149-2063(99)80053-1
  44. H. H. Harman. (1976). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago press.
  45. R. M. Baron & D. A. Kenny. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  46. J. C. Anderson & D. W. Gerbing. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  47. C. Fornell & D. F. Larcker. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388. DOI : 10.1177/002224378101800313
  48. L. S. Aiken & S. G. West. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.