DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Case Study on the Improvement Activities of Quality Circle by Improving Attorney System

품질분임조 개선 활동 활성화를 위한 개선변리사 제도

  • Park, Wanbok (SK Hynics, Cheongju Plant) ;
  • Ree, Sangbok (Dept. Industrial Management System Engineering, Seokyeong University)
  • 박완복 (SK하이닉스, 청주사업장) ;
  • 이상복 (서경대학교 경영문화대학원 경영학과 스마트품질경영전공)
  • Received : 2020.01.14
  • Accepted : 2020.02.18
  • Published : 2020.03.31

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to introduce the improving attorney system. It was confirmed by document writing that the staff in the field in Korea had the most difficulty in the Quality circle activities. The reform improving attorney is a quality expert at the Quality Secretariat and assists them in their documentation. Methods: Just as a patent attorney helps to get a patent, an improving attorney system helps document the improvement results of the field Quality circle and even standardizes the company. The process of introducing an improving attorney includes the declaration of an improving attorney are 11 levels of work. Results: An improving attorney was conducted in 600 organizations for 18 months. As a result of the comparison of the number of cases before and after the introduction of the improving attorney, the number of solution problem was lowered to 9 before 2016 and 8 in 2017, but after the introduction, it increased exponentially to 181 in 2018 and 162 in August 2019. In 2016 and 2017, only one standard was registered, but 64 standards were registered in 2018 and 71 in 2019. Conclusion: In this case, the improving attorney system was found to be helpful in activating the Quality circle. It is expected to revitalize Korea's Quality circle by spreading the improving attorney system to many companies.

Keywords

References

  1. JobKorea. 2005. 72% of Employees are Difficult to Prepare Business Documents. Gyeongbuk Daily Newspaper. September 26.
  2. Kim, Changnam. 2012. Need for Improvement Activities according to Company's Situation(a). KSAM Quality and Creativity 2012(April):114-121.
  3. Kim, Changnam. 2012. Need for Improvement Activities according to Company's Situation(b). KSAM Quality and Creativity. 2012(May):98-104.
  4. Lee, Kangin. 2011. Free Style Division Preparation Points Based on Judging Criteria. KSAM Quality and Creativity. 2011(March):80-89.
  5. Park, Hyuk-Jong. 2010. The Secret of Writing Documents that Inspires CEOs. Future and Management. Seoul.
  6. Park, Wanbokk. 2020. An Empirical Study on Improvement of the Patent Attorney System for Activation of Small Group Improvement Activities. Master's Thesis. Quality Management Major. Graduate School of Business Culture. Seokyong University.
  7. Ree, Sangbok. 2012. Quality Story. Eretec: Kunpo.
  8. Ree, Sangbok. 2014. Let's Make a Korean Quality Circle. KSAM Quality and Creativity 2014(October):65-69.
  9. Ree, Sangbok. 2018. Proposal of Role of Quality People and Quality Department in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Management 46(4):785-796.
  10. Ree, Sangbok. 2019. Review and Critique of the 45th National Quality Circle Competition. KSAM Quality and Creativity 2019(October):52-55.
  11. TTA(Telecommunications Technology Association). 2014. ICT Standardization Issue and Overseas Trend Report-Conflict Analysis between Patent and Standard 2:100-110.
  12. https://www.kpaa.or.kr/kpaa/member/download.do?clickPage=31. 2019. 11. 23. 2014 KOREA PATENT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION. All Rights Reserved.