한국ITS학회 논문지 (The Journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems)

  • 제19권1호
  • /
  • Pages.83-93
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1738-0774(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-1729(eISSN)
한국ITS학회 (The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

분석모형별 신호교차로 평균제어지체 비교·분석 연구

A Comparative Study on the Mean Control Delay by Signalized Intersections by the Analysis Model

  • 이규순 (동림티엔에스 교통시스템엔지니어링) ;
  • 박진우 (동림티엔에스 교통시스템엔지니어링) ;
  • 성삼현 (동림티엔에스 교통시스템엔지니어링) ;
  • 이탁수 (동림티엔에스 교통시스템엔지니어링)
  • Lee, kyu soon (Dept of Transportation Systems Engineering, DongRim TNS) ;
  • Park, Jin Woo (Dept of Transportation Systems Engineering, DongRim TNS) ;
  • Sung, Sam Hyun (Dept of Transportation Systems Engineering, DongRim TNS) ;
  • Lee, Tak Soo (Dept of Transportation Systems Engineering, DongRim TNS)
  • 투고 : 2019.11.08
  • 심사 : 2019.12.30
  • 발행 : 2020.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

지체시간은 신호교차로의 교통혼잡 수준을 나타내는 주요 지표로 활용되고 있다. 교통정체가 발생하는 대치역사거리와 비교적 교통상황이 원활한 영동5교 사거리를 비교 대상구간으로 선정하여, 현장조사를 기반으로 한 평균지체시간과 다양한 시뮬레이션 프로그램을 통하여 산출한 지체시간을 비교·분석하였다. 현장조사데이터와 신호교차로 분석 모형의 평균 제어지체 비교·분석결과 KHCS는 대치역사거리 7.7초/대, 영동5교사거리 7.9초/대의 차이를 보였으며, VISSIM은 대치역사거리 21.1초/대, 영동5교사거리 8.1초대의 차이로 분석되었다. T7F는 대치역사거리 3.3초/대, 영동5교사거리 9.3초/대의 결과값 차이로 분석되었다. 동일한 교차로를 분석하더라도 시뮬레이션 모형별로 결과값이 차이가 나는 것을 증명하였다.

The time delay is used as a major indicator of the level of traffic congestion on traffic crossroads. For this purpose, the Daechi Station intersection where traffic congestion occurs and the Yeongdong 5 Bridge intersection where the traffic condition is relatively good, and the average lag time based on the field survey with the lag time calculated various simulation programs. comparison of the average control delay of the field survey data the signal intersection analysis model the KHCS Dechi intersection 7.7 second / vehicle Young dong 5 bridge intersection 7.9 second / vehiclehe VISSIM showed a difference Dechi intersection 21.1 second / vehicle and Young dong 5 bridge intersection 8.1 second / vehiclehe T7F showed a difference Dechi intersection 3.3 second / vehicle and Young dong 5 bridge intersection 9.3 second / vehicle. Analyzing the same intersection proved that the results differed from one simulation model to another.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cho J. H., Cho Y. C. and Kim S. H.(2005), "Comparison of Delay Estimates for signalilzed intersection," Journal of Korean Society of Transportation, vol. 23, no.1, pp.67-80.
  2. Fambro D. B. and Ouphail N. M.(1997), "Generalized Delay Model for Signalized Intersections and Arterial Streets," Transportation Research Record, vol. 1572, no.1, pp.112-121. https://doi.org/10.3141/1572-14
  3. Hand S. S. and Park B. H.(2010), "Comparative Analysis on the Delay Between Multi-legged Roundabout and Signalized Inter," The Journal of Korean Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems, vol. 9, no.6, pp.83-93.
  4. Hand Y. H. and Kim Y. C.(2012), "The Macroscopic Model for Signalized Intersections to Consider Progression in relation to Delay," The Journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems, vol. 16, no. 5, pp.109-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2012.688384
  5. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport(2013), Korea Highway Capacity Manual, pp.210-416.
  6. Park B. K., Yun I. S. and Choi K. C.(2004), "Evaluation of Microscopic Simulation Tools for Coordinated Signal System Deployment," Journal of Korean KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 8, no. 2, pp.239-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02829124
  7. Yun I. S., Oh C., Ahn H. K., Kim K. H., Han E. and Kang N. W.(2014), "Performance Comparison of Signalized Intersections Analysis Tools in Estimating Control Delays," International Journal of Highway Engineering, vol. 16, no. 5, pp.109-119. https://doi.org/10.7855/IJHE.2014.16.5.109