The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (문화기술의 융합)

The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology (국제문화기술진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Combination Patterns between HRM and Business Strategy on Performance

인사관리와 사업전략 간의 결합패턴과 성과와의 관계에 대한 연구

  • Kim, Jinhee (Business School, Daegu Catholic University)
  • 김진희 (대구가톨릭대학교 경영학부)
  • Received : 2019.12.27
  • Accepted : 2020.01.21
  • Published : 2020.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper examines the performance according to the combination pattern of HRM and business strategy. The business strategy was divided into Miles & Snow's prospector, defender, and analyzer. Data were collected from the Korea Labor Institute's workplace panel survey from 2005 to 2015, and the analysis used 465 companies that are common respondents of the six wave surveys. To test the research model, structural equation modeling was employed. The results of the analysis showed that the combination of high commitment HRM and prospector had a positively significant effect on the performance. Contrariwise, the combination of high commitment HRM and defender, the combination of high commitment HRM and analyzer were not significant effect on performance.

본 논문은 기업의 인사관리와 사업전략 간의 결합패턴에 따른 성과에 대해 분석하였다. 사업전략은 Miles & Snow의 혁신자, 방어자, 분석자 전략으로 구분하였으며, 각 전략 하에서 인사관리가 성과에 미치는 효과를 분석하였다. 자료는 한국노동연구원(KLI)이 2015년까지 진행한 사업체패널조사에 모두 응답한 업체들 중 사업전략에 대해 응답한 465개 기업의 자료를 사용하였다. 분석은 구조방정식모형을 활용하였다. 먼저 전체 표본을 대상으로 몰입형 인사관리와 성과에 대한 관계를 분석하였으며, 다음으로 사업전략 유형에 따라 나눈 개별 자료에서 인사관리가 성과에 미치는 모형을 분석하여 각 모형에서의 변수 간 관계와 모형적합도를 비교하였다. 먼저 전체 표본을 대상으로 한 분석결과에서 몰입형 인사관리가 성과에 유의한 영향을 미쳤고, 모형적합도도 양호하였다. 다음으로 개별 전략 하에서의 모형을 분석하였는데, 몰입형 인사관리는 혁신자 전략에서 성과에 유의한 영향을 미쳤으며, 모형적합도도 양호하였다. 그러나 방어자 및 분석자 전략과 몰입형 인사관리 간의 결합은 성과에 유의하지 않았고 모형적합도도 낮게 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Datta, D. K., Guthrie, J. P., & Wright, P. M. (2005). Human Resource Management and Labor Productivity: Does Industry Matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 135-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.15993158
  2. Moon, C. (2013). The Effects of Aligning Competitive Strategy with Organizational Orientations and Environmental Characteristics on Performance of Venture Firms. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 26(11), 2899-2930.
  3. Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  4. Hambrick, D. C. (1983). Some Test of Effectiveness and Functional Attributes of Miles and Snow's Strategy Types. Academy of Management Journal, 26(1), 5-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/256132
  5. Snow, C. C., & Hrebiniak, L. G. (1980). Strategy, Distinctive Competence, and Organizational Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15. 317-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2392457
  6. Jun, I., Oh, S., & Ahn, S. (2013). High Performance Work System and Operational Performance: Focusing on a Mediating Role of Employee Performance. Korean Journal of Labor Studies, 19(1), 65-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.17005/kals.2013.19.1.65
  7. Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in The Performance of High-Technology Firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794671
  8. Chadwick, C., Way, S. A., Kerr, G., & Thacker, J. W. (2013), Boundary Conditions of The High-Investment Human Resource Systems-Small-Firm Labor Productivity Relationship. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 311-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/peps.12015
  9. Hur, C., & Lee, H. (2006). Strategic HRM Oriented in High-Performance and Technology Innovation: The Mediation Effects of Labor Worker's Attitude. Quarterly Journal of Labor Policy, 6(4), 195-231.
  10. Kim, J. (2009). The Effects of High Commitment HRM on Internalization of HRM Practices, Organizational Commitment and Quality Management Activity. Quarterly Journal of Labor Policy, 9(3), 81-111. https://doi.org/10.22914/JLP.2009.9.3.004
  11. Cooney, R.(2004), Empowered Self-Management and The Design of Work Teams. Personnel Review, 33(6): 677-692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00483480410561556
  12. Pal, M. N., & Choushury, K. (2009). Exploring The Dimensionality of Service Quality: An Application of TOPSIS in The Indian Banking Industry. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 26(1), 115-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217595909002110
  13. Yoon, K. & Chang, Y. (2016). IOT-based SMEs Producing Standardized Information System Model Analysis and Design. The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology, 2(1), 87-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2016.2.1.87
  14. Dyer, L., & Reeves, T. (1995). Human Resource Strategies and Firm Performance: What Do We Know and Where Do We Need to Go? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(3), 656-670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585199500000041
  15. Kim, J. (2019). Effect of Fitness between Organizational Innovation and HRM Type on Performance. The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology, 5(1), 21-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2019.5.1.21
  16. Arthur, J. B. (1994). Effects of Human Resource System on Manufacturing Performance and Turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 670-687. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256705
  17. Gelade, G. A., & Ivery, M. (2003). The Impact of Hman Resource Management and Work Climate on Organizational Performance. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 383-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00155.x
  18. Kim, J. (2011). The Relationships between HR Throughflow Types, Business Strategy and Organizational Performance. The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(2), 45-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.18211/kjhrdq.2011.13.2.003
  19. Kim, M. (2019). A Study on Management Competency Affecting Organizational Performance. International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology, 7(2), 93-102. DOI : 10.17703/IJACT.2019.7.2.93