Physical Therapy Korea (한국전문물리치료학회지)

Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy (한국전문물리치료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of Patients' Level of Participation in Rehabilitation on Functional Outcome in Patients With Stroke

뇌졸중 환자의 재활참여가 기능회복에 미치는 영향

  • Won, Jong-im (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Jeonju University)
  • 원종임 (전주대학교 의과학대학 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2019.10.22
  • Accepted : 2019.12.09
  • Published : 2020.02.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Stroke recovery is a long and complex process. Successful stroke recovery seems to be strongly associated with patients' high motivation and committed participation. Patients' motivation is a key determinant of successful rehabilitation outcomes, but it is difficult in defining and measuring. Patients' participation is defined as the degree or extent to which subjects take part in rehabilitation activities and can be measured by observable behavior. Objects: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of patients' level of participation in rehabilitation on functional outcomes in patients with stroke. Methods: Forty post-stroke inpatients participated in this study. The level of rehabilitation participation was measured by the Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale (HRERS). Other measures used for the evaluation were the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) and Korean version of the Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI). Overall measurements were made at early intervention and late intervention. Spearman correlation and multiple regression were used to measure the relationships between HRERS, RMI, and K-MBI. Results: The correlation found between HRERS total scores at early intervention and RMI total scores of late intervention was above moderate (r = 0.607, p < 0.01). RMI total scores at early intervention (p < 0.000), HRERS total scores at early intervention (p < 0.001), and disease duration (p < 0.003) were significant predictors of RMI total scores at late intervention. Conclusion: The level of participation at early intervention was associated with improvement in mobility. The level of mobility at early intervention, disease duration, and patients' participation at early intervention were important determinants of functional outcome. These findings suggest that patients' participation should be encouraged in order to achieve successful stroke recovery.

Keywords

References

  1. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 2011;377(9778):1693-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5
  2. Mohd Nordin NA, Aziz NA, Abdul Aziz AF, Ajit Singh DK, Omar Othman NA, Sulong S, et al. Exploring views on long term rehabilitation for people with stroke in a developing country: findings from focus group discussions. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:118. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-118
  3. Cifu DX, Stewart DG. Factors affecting functional outcome after stroke: a critical review of rehabilitation interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80(5 Suppl 1):S35-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90101-6
  4. Yagura H, Miyai I, Seike Y, Suzuki T, Yanagihara T. Benefit of inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation up to 1 year after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84(11):1687-91. https://doi.org/10.1053/S0003-9993(03)00286-7
  5. Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, Wood Dauphinee S, Richards C, Ashburn A, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2004;35(11):2529-39. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000143153.76460.7d
  6. Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Grasso MG, Morelli D, Troisi E, Coiro P, et al. Early versus delayed inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a matched comparison conducted in Italy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81(6):695-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90095-9
  7. Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Pratesi L, Traballesi M, Lubich S, Grasso MG. Functional outcome in stroke inpatient rehabilitation: predicting no, low and high response patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 1998;8(4):228-34. https://doi.org/10.1159/000015856
  8. Paolucci S, Matano A, Bragoni M, Coiro P, De Angelis D, Fusco FR, et al. Rehabilitation of left brain-damaged ischemic stroke patients: the role of comprehension language deficits. A matched comparison. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005;20(5):400-6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000088671
  9. Ween JE, Alexander MP, D'Esposito M, Roberts M. Factors predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabilitation setting. Neurology 1996;47(2):388-92. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.47.2.388
  10. Maclean N, Pound P. A critical review of the concept of patient motivation in the literature on physical rehabilitation. Soc Sci Med 2000;50(4):495-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00334-2
  11. Lenze EJ, Munin MC, Quear T, Dew MA, Rogers JC, Begley AE, et al. Significance of poor patient participation in physical and occupational therapy for functional outcome and length of stay. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004b;85(10):1599-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.027
  12. Paolucci S, Di Vita A, Massicci R, Traballesi M, Bureca I, Matano A, et al. Impact of participation on rehabilitation results: a multivariate study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2012;48(3):455-66.
  13. Horton S, Howell A, Humby K, Ross A. Engagement and learning: an exploratory study of situated practice in multi-disciplinary stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2011;33(3):270-9. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2010.524270
  14. Kortte KB, Falk LD, Castillo RC, Johnson-Greene D, Wegener ST. The Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale: development and psychometric properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88(7):877-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.03.030
  15. Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. Qualitative analysis of stroke patients' motivation for rehabilitation. BMJ 2000;321(7268):1051-4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7268.1051
  16. Horn W, Yoels W, Bartolucci A. Factors associated with patients' participation in rehabilitation services: a comparative injury analysis 12 months post-discharge. Disabil Rehabil 2000;22(8):358-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/096382800296601
  17. Resnick B. Geriatric rehabilitation: the influence of efficacy beliefs and motivation. Rehabil Nurs 2002;27(4):152-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2048-7940.2002.tb02224.x
  18. Medley AR, Powell T. Motivational Interviewing to promote self-awareness and engagement in rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a conceptual review. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2010;20(4):481-508. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010903529610
  19. Koh GC, Saxena SK, Ng TP, Yong D, Fong NP. Effect of duration, participation rate, and supervision during community rehabilitation on functional outcomes in the first poststroke year in Singapore. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012;93(2):279-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.017
  20. Lenze EJ, Munin MC, Quear T, Dew MA, Rogers JC, Begley AE, et al. The Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale: reliability and validity of a clinician-rated measure of participation in acute rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85(3):380-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.001
  21. Hsueh IP, Wang CH, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL. Comparison of psychometric properties of three mobility measures for patients with stroke. Stroke 2003;34(7):1741-5. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000075295.45185.d4
  22. Jung HY, Park BK, Shin HS, Kang YK, Pyun SB, Paik NJ, et al. Development of the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI): multi-center study for subjects with stroke. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2007;31(3):283-97.
  23. Chiou II, Burnett CN. Values of activities of daily living. A survey of stroke patients and their home therapists. Phys Ther 1985;65(6):901-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/65.6.901
  24. Luker J, Lynch E, Bernhardsson S, Bennett L, Bernhardt J. Stroke survivors' experiences of physical rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015;96(9):1698-708.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.017
  25. Mihaljcic T, Haines TP, Ponsford JL, Stolwyk RJ. Investigating the relationship between reduced self-awareness of falls risk, rehabilitation engagement and falls in older adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2017;69:38-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2016.11.003
  26. Lenze EJ, Munin MC, Quear T Jr, Dew MA, Rogers JC, Reynolds CF 3rd. Cognitive and affective predictors of rehabilitation outcome in patients with hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84(9):E18.
  27. Talkowski JB, Lenze EJ, Munin MC, Harrison C, Brach JS. Patient participation and physical activity during rehabilitation and future functional outcomes in patients after hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90(4):618-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2008.10.024
  28. Bright FA, Kayes NM, Cummins C, Worrall LM, McPherson KM. Co-constructing engagement in stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative study exploring how practitioner engagement can influence patient engagement. Clin Rehabil 2017;31(10):1396-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215517694678
  29. Yang SY, Kong KH. Level and predictors of participation in patients with stroke undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. Singapore Med J 2013;54(10):564-8. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2013201
  30. Skidmore ER, Whyte EM, Holm MB, Becker JT, Butters MA, Dew MA, et al. Cognitive and affective predictors of rehabilitation participation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91(2):203-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.026
  31. Taub M. Relationship of Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale to baseline cognition and FIM change in acute inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016;97(10):e111-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.08.347