DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

딸기 시설 하우스 점박이응애에 대한 살비 효과 평가

Evaluation of Acaricidal Effect Against Two-spotted Spider Mite Collected from Strawberry in Greenhouse

  • 권덕호 (국립한국농수산대학 채소학과) ;
  • 안율균 (국립한국농수산대학 채소학과) ;
  • 홍규현 (국립한국농수산대학 채소학과)
  • Kwon, D.H. (Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries) ;
  • Ahn, Y.K. (Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries) ;
  • Hong, K.H. (Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries)
  • 투고 : 2020.11.06
  • 심사 : 2020.12.10
  • 발행 : 2020.12.28

초록

딸기 재배지에서 점박이응애는 엽록소를 직접적으로 흡즙하여 생산량을 낮추는 주요 난방제 해충이다. 본 연구에서는 간이 약효 검정법을 개발하여 친환경유기농자재와 화학합성살비제가 포함된 10종의 약효를 평가하였다. 해당 기법은 4개의 약제를 3반복으로 실험할 수 있는 장점이 있어 시료 전처리 시간을 단축시킬 수 있다. 감수성 계통(SL_YS)을 포함한 전북 정읍(2020_JB_01), 충북 청주(2020_CB_01), 강원 고성(2020_GW_01)에서 채집한 지역 계통을 대상으로 약효를 평가한 결과 감수성 계통은 약 90-100% 사충률을 보인 반면에 지역 계통은 약제별로 상이하게 나타났다. 우수 약제를 선발하기 위해 약효 지수를 감수성 계통을 기준으로 산출하였다. 2020_JB_01 계통에 대한 우수 약제는 Test_02, Test_03 그리고 Test_10 약제가 선정되었다. 2020_CB_01 계통에 대해서는 Test_03과 Test_04가 선정되었다. 2020_GW_01 계통에서는 Test_01, Test_02, Test_03, Test_06 그리고 Test_10이 선정되었다. 계통 별 약제 반응이 다른 이유는 농가별 사용 약제와 살포 횟수가 다르기 때문인 것으로 사료된다. 약효 간이 검정법은 우수 약제 선발을 가능하게 하여 딸기 재배지 점박이응애 방제 효율을 증대시킬 것으로 기대된다.

In the strawberry cultivation areas and domestic farms, two-spotted spider mites are the most serious pests. It decreases the product yield due to the direct feeding of chlorophyll by the mites resulting in reduced photosynthetic ability of host plant. In this study, a simplified acaricidal effect evaluation system (SAEES) was employed to choose the effective acaricidal products among 10 items based on leaf-dipping bioassay methods. SAEES had the advantage of being able to screen four commercial products with three replications at the same time in the recommended concentration. The susceptible strains (SL_YS) showed a high mortality rate of about 90-100%, whereas the mortality of local strains was differed by each acaricides. It suggests that the acaricide responses of field populations might differ due to spray frequencies and acaricide product. An efficacy index (0.8-1.0) was determined based on the mortality of susceptible strain, which would allow the most effective commercial products to be selected by the range of this index. In summary, SAEES will enable the selection of effective commercial products and contribute to increasing control against T. urticae in strawberries.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 국가통계포털. 2020. http://kosis.kr/index/index.do
  2. 김용헌, 김정환, 박상구. (2001). 비닐하우스 재배 딸기에서 점박이응애의 발생. 한국곤충학회지. 31: 139-142.
  3. 이승찬, 김운영, 김상수. (1986). 점박이응애의 약제저항성 (藥劑抵抗性) 수준결정방법 (水準決定方法) 비교 (比較) 와 Benzomate, Cyhexatin 및 Dicofol 저항성 (抵抗性) 조사 (調査) 연구(硏究). 한국식물보호학회지. 25: 133-138.
  4. 최병렬, 박형만, 유재기, 김선곤, 백채훈, 이시우. (2005). 시설 재배 작물 주요 해충에 대한 약제저항성 모니터링. 농약과학회지. 9: 380-390.
  5. 남명현, 김태일, 김현숙, 이이하, 이희철, 장원석. (2015). 쉽게 알아보는 딸기 병해충(제3판). 농촌진흥청 딸기수출연구사업단, 충남농업기술원 과채연구소 논산딸기시험장
  6. Azadi Dana, E., Sadeghi, A., Guncan, A., Khanjani, M., Babolhavaeji, H., Maroufpoor, M. (2018). Demographic comparison of the Tetranychus urticae Koch. (Acari: Tetranychidae) reared on different cultivars of strawberry. Journal of Economic Entomology. 111: 2927-2935.
  7. Bi, J.L., Niu, Z.M., Yu, L., Toscano, N.C. (2016). Resistance status of the carmine spider mite, Tetranychus cinnabarinus and the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae to selected acaricides on strawberries. Insect Science. 23: 88-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12190
  8. Croft, B.A., Van De Baan, H.E. (1988). Ecological and genetic factors influencing evolution of pesticide resistance in tetranychid and phytoseiid mites. Experimental Applied Acarology. 4: 277-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01196191
  9. Dennehy, T., Grafton-Cardwell, E., Granett, J., Barbour, K. (1987). Practitioner-assessable bioassay for detection of dicofol resistance in spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae). Journal of Economic Entomology. 80: 998-1003. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/80.5.998
  10. Dennehy, T.J., Granett, J., Leigh, T.F. (1983). Relevance of slide-dip and residual bioassay comparisons to detection of resistance in spider mites. Journal of Economic Entomology. 76: 1225-1230. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/76.6.1225
  11. Helle, W., Sabelis, M. W. (1985). Spider mites: their biology, natural enemies and control.
  12. Houck, M. A., 1994. Mites: An ecological and evolutionary analyses of life history patterns. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.
  13. Koh, S. H., Ahn, J., Im, J. S., Jung, C., Lee, S. H., Lee, J. H. (2009). Monitoring of acaricide resistance of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) from Korean apple orchards. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology. 12: 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2008.10.004
  14. Oatman, E., Sances, F., LaPre, L., Toscano, N., Voth, V. (1982). Effects of different infestation levels of the two-spotted spider mite on strawberry yield in winter plantings in southern California. Journal of Economic Entomology. 75: 94-96. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/75.1.94
  15. Van Leeuwen, T., Vontas, J., Tsagkarakou, A., Dermauw, W., Tirry, L. (2010). Acaricide resistance mechanisms in the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae and other important Acari: A review. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 40: 563-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2010.05.008
  16. Vassiliou, V.A., Kitsis, P. (2013). Acaricide resistance in Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) populations from Cyprus. Journal of Economic Entomology. 106: 1848-1854. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC12369
  17. Wang, Z., Cang, T., Wu, S., Wang, X., Qi, P., Wang, X., Zhao, X. (2018). Screening for suitable chemical acaricides against two-spotted spider mites, Tetranychus urticae, on greenhouse strawberries in China. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 163: 63-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.07.058
  18. Whalon, M. E., Mota-Sanchez, R. M., Hollingworth, R.M., Duynslager, L., 2008. Artrhopods Resistant to Pesticides Database (ARPD).
  19. Yalcin, K., Doker, I., Kazak, C. (2018). Acaricide resistance in Tetranychus urticae red form (Acari: Tetranychidae) collected from strawberry in southern Turkey: Bioassay and biochemical studies1. Systematic and Applied Acarology. 23: 2279-2287. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.23.12.1