Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society (한국지반공학회논문집)

Korean Geotechnical Society (한국지반공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Feasibility Study for Revision of Domestic Liquefaction Evaluation Criteria by Analyzing the Liquefaction Phenomenon Caused by the Pohang Earthquake

포항지진 액상화 현상 분석을 통한 국내 액상화 평가 기준의 개정 타당성 검토

  • Ha, Ik-Soo (Dept. of Civil Engrg., Kyungnam Univ.) ;
  • Oh, I-Tae (Dept. of Civil Engrg., Kyungnam Univ.)
  • 하익수 (경남대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 오이태 (경남대학교 토목공학과)
  • Received : 2020.03.01
  • Accepted : 2020.04.17
  • Published : 2020.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, liquefaction evaluation was performed by applying liquefaction evaluation criteria commonly applied in Korea and recently revised evaluation criteria to five sites where liquefaction was observed or potential for liquefaction was high during the 2017 Pohang earthquake. The purpose of this study is to examine the validity of the revised domestic liquefaction evaluation criteria by comparing and reviewing the results of the theoretical liquefaction evaluation with the actual liquefaction occurrence at the sites. For the analysis of earthquakes for the evaluation of the liquefaction, the actual Pohang earthquake wave, as well as the waves that was conventionally used in Korea, was used. The magnitude of the peak ground acceleration of analysis earthquake varied from 0.097 g to 0.2713 g. From the analysis results, the validity of the liquefaction evaluation criteria presented in the 2016 Foundation Design Criteria, which has been commonly applied in Korea, was evaluated. From the evaluation results, the improvement of the existing criteria was suggested, and the suitability of revised items of liquefaction evaluation criteria presented in the Seismic Design General established in 2018 was confirmed.

본 연구의 목적은 2017년 포항지진 시 액상화가 관측되었거나 액상화 가능성이 높은 부지 5곳에 대하여, 국내에서 통상적으로 적용해 왔던 액상화 평가 기준과 최근 개정된 평가 기준을 적용하여 액상화 평가를 실시하고, 이러한 이론적인 액상화 평가 결과와 대상 부지에서의 실제 액상화 발현여부를 비교·검토함으로써, 개정된 액상화 평가 기준의 타당성을 검토하는 데에 있다. 액상화 평가를 위한 해석지진은 기존 국내에서 통상적으로 사용해 온 지진파와 포항 실지진파를 사용하였고, 해석지진의 최대지반가속도 크기는 0.097g~0.2713g 범위의 값을 적용하였다. 해석결과로부터, 기존 국내에서 통상적으로 적용해 왔던 구조물기초설계기준(2016)에 제시된 액상화 평가 기준의 개선점을 제시하고, 2018년에 개정된 내진설계일반에 제시된 액상화평가 기준의 기존 기준대비 개정 사항의 상대적 타당성을 평가해 보았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, J. K., Baek, W. H., Choi, J. S., and Kwak, D. Y. (2018), "Investigation of Pohang Earthquake Liquefaction Using 1D Effective-Stress Site Response Analysis", Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol.34, No.8, pp.37-49. https://doi.org/10.7843/KGS.2018.34.8.37
  2. Choi, Y. J. and Hong Y. G. (2017), "A Study on Direction of Construction for Earthquake Disaster Information System in Daegu Based on GIS", Daegu Gyungbok Development Institute, pp.3-4.
  3. Choi, J. S., Park, I. J., Hwang, K., and Jang, J. (2018), "A Study on Seismic Liquefaction Risk Map of Electric Power Utility Tunnel in South-East Korea", Journal of the Korean Geo-environmental Society, Vol.19, No.10, pp.13-19. https://doi.org/10.14481/JKGES.2018.19.10.13
  4. EESK (2019), Manual of Seismic Design General (KDS 17 10 00 : 2018), Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, Goomibook, pp.72-75.
  5. Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C. F. (1956), "Earthquake Magnitude, Intensity, Energy, and Acceleration: (Second paper)", Bulletin of the seismological society of America, Vol.46, No.2, pp.105-145. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0460020105
  6. Han, S.M., Park, E.H., Ham, I.K., Park, S.C, Jeon, Y.S., Jo, E.Y., and Lee, C.W., "Technical Report for the Observation Environment of the Korean Meteorological Administration Seismic Observatory", National Institute of Meteorological Sciences, NIMR-TN-2014-007, pp.54.
  7. Idriss, I. M. (1990), "Response of Soft Soil Sites during Earthquakes", In Proceedings of HB Seed Memorial Symp., Vol.2, pp.273-289.
  8. Idriss, I. M. and Sun, J. I. (1993), User's manual for SHAKE91: a computer program for conducting equivalent linear seismic response analyses of horizontally layered soil deposits, http://nisee.berkeley.edu/elibrary/getpkg?id=SHAKE91
  9. Iwasaki, T. (1978), "A Practical Method for Assessing Soil Liqufaction Potential based on Case Studies at various Sites in Japan", In Proceedings of Second Int. Conf., Microzonation Safer Construction Research Application, Vol.2, pp.885-896.
  10. KGS (2018), Manual of Foundation Design Criteria, Korean Geotechnical Society, pp.826-837.
  11. Kim, D. K. (2013), Dynamics of Structure, Goomibook, pp.413-414.
  12. KMA (2019), 2018 Earthquake Annual Report, Korea Meteorological Administration, pp.1-10.
  13. Liao, S. S. and Whitman, R. V. (1986), "Overburden Correction Factors for SPT in Sand", Journal of Geotechnical engineering, Vol.112, No.3, pp.373-377. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1986)112:3(373)
  14. MOF (1999), Standard of Seismic Design for Fishing Port and Harbor Facilities, Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries.
  15. MOLIT (2016), Foundation Design Criteria, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.
  16. MOLIT (2018), Seismic Design General, KDS 17 10 00:2018, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.
  17. Mun, G. Y. (2018), A Study on the Effect of Relative Density and Particle Size Distribution on the Liquefaction Resistance Strength of Sand in Pohang Liquefaction Region, Master's thesis, Pusan National University, pp.66-68.
  18. NDMI (2017), The investigated result of liquefaction due to Pohang earthquake (2017.11.15.), National Disaster Management Research Institute.
  19. Nuttli, O. W. and Herrmann, R. B. (1978), State-of-the-Art for Assessing Earthquake Hazards in the United States : Report 12, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
  20. Park, S. S., Nong, Z., Choi, S. G., and Moon, H. D. (2018), "Liquefaction Resistance of Pohang Sand", Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol.34, No.9, pp.5-17. https://doi.org/10.7843/kgs.2018.34.9.5
  21. Schnabel, P. B. and Seed, H. B. (1973), "Accelerations in Rock for Earthquakes in the Western United States", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol.63, No.2, pp.501-516.
  22. Schnabel, P. B., Lysmer, K., and Seed, H. B. (1972), SHAKE: A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites, EERC Report 72-12, University of California, Berkeley.
  23. Seed, H. B. and Idriss, I. M. (1971), "Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Soil Liquefaction Potential", Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, Vol.97, No.9, pp.1249-1273. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001662
  24. Seed, H. B., Ugas, C., and Lysmer, J. (1976), "Site-dependent Spectra for Earthquake-resistant Design", Bulletin of the Seismological society of America, Vol.66, No.1, pp.221-243.
  25. Trifunac, M. D. and Brady, A. G. (1975), "On Correlation of Seismoscope Response with Earthquake Magnitude and Modified Mercalli Intensity", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol.65 No.2, pp.307-321.
  26. Youd, T. L. and Idriss, I. M. (2001), "Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils", Journal of geotechnical and geo-environmental engineering, Vol.127, No.4, pp.297-313. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:4(297)