Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Promotion of Regional Innovation and Industrial-Academic Cooperation Using Living Labs

리빙랩을 활용한 지역혁신과 산학협력 촉진방안

  • Kim, Young Mi (Dept. of Public Administration, Sangmyung University)
  • Received : 2020.03.13
  • Accepted : 2020.04.20
  • Published : 2020.04.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Innovation in local industries and the development of public services require, among other things, shared growth with the concept of regional co-prosperity. Regional co-prosperity is essentially aimed at bridging regional balance or regional gaps, which means a relationship that can achieve shared growth through complementary cooperation. In this study, cases using living labs were drawn based on the current status of industry-academic cooperation at the level of regional innovation and its policy implications were sought. Local governments are making various attempts to solve regional problems and enhance the linkage effect of securing mutual competitiveness through co-prosperity cooperation autonomously. In particular, an effective approach has been continued by activating the Living Lab Network, a problem-solving mechanism, focusing on pending regional issues. Above all, one of the strategies for regional development should be linked to the establishment of a cooperative system for win-win cooperation and policy means to support it. The activation of cooperative programs with local universities, companies and local governments and the case of problem-solving using living labs. Therefore, it suggested that active participation by various stakeholders and a cooperative governance model were needed to enable Living Lab.

지역 산업의 혁신과 공공서비스의 발전을 위해서는 무엇보다 지역상생 개념을 적용한 동반 성장이 필요하다. 지역상생은 본질적으로 지역 간 균형 또는 지역 간 격차를 해소하기 위한 것으로, 상호보완적 협력을 통해 동반 성장을 할 수 있는 관계를 의미한다. 본 연구에서는 지역혁신 차원의 산학협력 현황을 중심으로 리빙랩을 활용한 사례를 도출하고 이의 정책적 함의를 모색하였다. 지방자치단체는 자율적으로 상생협력을 통해 지역의 문제를 해결하고 상호 경쟁력 확보 차원의 연계 효과를 제고 하기 위한 다각적인 시도가 이어지고 있다. 특히 지역의 현안을 중심으로 문제해결 기제인 리빙랩 네트워크를 활성화하여 실효성 있는 접근이 이어지고 있다. 무엇보다 지역의 발전을 위한 전략 중 하나로 상생 협력을 위한 협력체제 구축과 이를 지원하기 위한 정책 수단이 연계되어야 한다. 지역의 대학과 기업 및 지자체가 함께 하는 협력 프로그램의 활성화와 리빙랩을 활용한 문제해결 사례는 그 의의가 크다고 평가받고 있다. 따라서 리빙랩의 활성화를 위해 다양한 이해관계자의 적극적 참여와 협력적 거버넌스 모델이 필요함을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. H .D. Hong. (2002). A Study on the Establishment of Strategies for Industrial-Academic Cooperation : Focusing on the Role Model of National Industrial Universities, KAPA, The Presentation of the Fall Conference. 1-18.
  2. K. S. Lee, K. S. Kwon & Y. P. Chun. (2005). An Empirical Study on Regional Innovation Governance in a Local Government: the Case of Pohang City, KPAR, 39(4), 39-62.
  3. S. C. Ko. (2004). Regional Innovation Theory and Strategy, Seoul:Daeyoung publish.
  4. J. W. Yoo. (2003). Korean Local Political Theory, Seoul:Bakyungsa.
  5. Y. P. Chun. (2003). Building a Governance Model for Local Governments: Focused on the Formation and Policy Participation Level of Public-Public NGOs, KJPS, 41(1), 47-71.
  6. J. E. Sung, K. Y. Han, W. J. Song & M. S. Kim. (2019). Current Status and Tasks of Campus Living Labs as a New Model for Innovation, Social Science Research, 26(2), 171-195.
  7. H. I. Jin, J. Y. Kang, D. S. Choi & M. S. Lee. (2020). The effect of Living-Lab project for the social participation of NEETs, Innovation Studies, Korea Society of Innovation, 15(1), 251-272.
  8. H. T. Leem. (2019). Nature and Sources of Business Values in Digital Social Innovation, Journal of information and communication convergence engineering, KIICE, 23(8), 950-958.
  9. A. S. Halibas, R.O. Sibayan & R. L. R. Maata. (2017). The Penta Helix Model of Innovation in Oman: An HEI Perspective, Interdisciplinary journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, Informing Science Institute, 12. 159-174.
  10. J. A. Ok. (2019.4). a meeting of people and regions: Living Lab Solves Regional Problems.Issue & Analysis, GRI, 367. https://www.gri.re.kr/%ec%9d%b8%ed%8f%ac%ea%b7% b8%eb%9e%98%ed%94%bd%ec%8a%a4/?brno=13261&p rno=6505.
  11. H. S. Shon, (2018), A study and case study of Living Lab. Journal of the Academic Presentation Conference of the Korean Society of Urban Public Administration, KSUPA, 144-155.
  12. J. E. Sung & M. S. Kim. (2018). Living Labs as a Model for University Innovation, Journal of Engeering Educational Research, KSEE, 18(1), 118-127.
  13. H. J. Kim & M. A. Jung. (2017). Policies for Urban Innovation in the Age of Digital Transformation : Innovation Districts and Data-Driven Smart Cities, Science and Technology Policy, STEPI.
  14. H.Etzkowitz & L. Leydesdorff. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ''Mode2'' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy, (29), 109-123.
  15. Y. M. Kim. (2019). Digital-Based Regional Innovation and Industry-Academic Cooperation Promotion Plan, Korea's Balanced Development in 2019 a policy fair Presentation Paper. 1-23.
  16. Y. M. Kim. (2018). Power to change the city! Find in companies and universities. Local Information Magazine, KLID,(11-12). 66-69.
  17. Y. M. Kim. (2019). In the Regional Information Begin again Government Innovation, Local Information Magazine, KLID,(11-12). 52-55.
  18. Y.M.Kim.(2017). Paradigm Change and Strategy of Government Services through the Utilization of Big Data - Focused on Disaster and Safety Management in Seoul City, Journal of Digital Convergence, SDPM, 15(2), 59-65.
  19. T. Y. Kim, W. S. Seol, Y. I. Lee & H. J. Ko. (2019). Research for activation of new industry-university cooperation, Journal of Digital Convergence, SDPM, 17(12), 77-82. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.12.077
  20. M. Harbers, P. Waart & E. Visser. (2015). Value Sensitive Design of Smart Cities, Conference Paper, (8).
  21. A. Kleibrink & S.Schmidt.(2015). Communities of Practice as New Actors: Innovation Labs Inside and Outside Government. in Open Innovation Yearbook 2015. European Commission. (53). 1-30.