DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

도시공원에 번식하는 박새의 이소 전후 어미 행동권 분석

Home Range Analysis of Great Tit (Parus major) before and after Fledging in an Urban Park

  • 송원경 (단국대학교 녹지조경학과)
  • 투고 : 2020.01.20
  • 심사 : 2020.02.10
  • 발행 : 2020.02.28

초록

Urban parks provide a variety of ecosystem services and are an important means of providing positive functions to urban ecosystems. Recently, various studies on wildlifes in urban parks have been conducted. However, there is a lack of research on habitat use in urban parks at important times such as before and after fledging in bird ecology. This study analyzed habitat use and home-range before and after fledging on Cheongsa park, a neighborhood park located in Cheonan city. An artificial nest was set up to check and capture great tit in fledging time. One female was captured and attached to the NTQB-2 (0.4g) radio transmitter, the location was tracked using SIKA Radio Tracking Receiver, hand-held three element Yagi antenna and GPS. Location information was recorded for 10 minutes for 3 hours each morning and afternoon for 12 days from May 17 to May 31, 2019. As a result, the home-range of the target species was 1.776 ha (MCP) and the core area was 499 ㎡ (KD 50%). The average daily home-range was 0.513 ha for the entire period, 0.688 ha before fledging, 0.339 ha after fledging based on MCP. The bird moved about 29.9 m on average and moved up to 131.7 m. For the most of the time, the great tit stayed inside the park, but the bird also used small green spaces such as street trees, tree flower beds, and green areas of unused lands. The results of this study could be applied to the study of habitat use and the greenery management policy of the urban park considering wild birds.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alatalo RV. 1980. Seasonal dynamics of resource partitioning among foliage-gleaning passerines in northern Finland. Oecologia 45 : 190-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346459
  2. Chris BT. VH Ross-Smith. JA Clark. NA Clar k. GJ Conway. M Marsh. EHK Leat and NHK Burton. 2015. A trial of three harness attachment methods and their suitability for long-term use on Lesser Blackbacked Gulls and Great Skuas. Ringing & Migration 29(2) : 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/03078698.2014.995546
  3. Chung, CU. SH Han and CI Lee. 2010. Homerange Analysis of Pipistrelle Bat (Pipistrellus abramus) in Non-Reproductive Season by Using Radio-tracking. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 24(4) : 487-492. (in Korean with English summary)
  4. Costanza, R. R d’Arge. R de Groot. S Farber. M Grasso. B Hannon. K Limburg S Naee m. RV O’Neoll. J Paruelo. RS Raskin. P Sutto and M Belt. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387 : 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
  5. Davidson-Watts, I and GJ Johne. 2006. Differences in foraging behaviour between Pipistrellus pipistrellus and Pipistrellus pygmaeus. J. Zool. 268 : 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2005.00016.x
  6. Fernadez-Juricic, E. and J Jokimaki. 2001. A habitat island approach to conserving birds in urban landscapes: case studies from southern and norther Europe. Biodiversity and Conservation 10 : 2023-2043. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013133308987
  7. Hong, SH and JI Kwak. 2011. Characteristics ofAppearance by Vegetation Type of Paridaein Urban Forest of Korea. J. Environ. Ecol. 25(5) : 760-766. (in Korean with English summary)
  8. Jeon, YS. SC Kim. SH Han and CU Chung. 2018. Characteristics of the Home Range and Habitat Use of the Greater Horseshoe Bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) in an Urban Landscape. Journal of Environmental Science International 27(8) : 665-675. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2018.27.8.665
  9. Jeong, HJ. EA Cho. HS Ko and GS Jang. 2012. A research on the reproductive properties of great tits in the urban Forest. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 15(5) : 155-163. (in Korean with English summary)
  10. Jung, SM. MS Shin. HJ Cho. SW Han. HM Son. JW Kim. SI Kang. HS Lee and HS Oh. 2019. Study on the Home-range and Winter Habitat Pintail using the Wild-Tracker (WT-300) in Korea. J. Environ. Ecol. 33(1) : 1-8. (in Korean with English summary)
  11. Kang, TH. DH Kim. HJ Cho. YU Shin. HS Le e. JH Suh and JK Hwang. 2014. Movements and Home-range of Mallards by GPS-Mobile based Telementary(WT-200) in Korea. J. Environ. Ecol. 28(6) : 642-649. (in Korean with English summary)
  12. Kim, J. GD Moon and TH Koo. 2004. Characteristics of Bird Community and Habitat Use in Gildong Natural Ecological Park. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 7(1) : 19-29. (in Korean with English summary)
  13. Kim, SY. WM Kim. WK Song and EJ Hyeong. 2018. Home-range Analysis of Varied Tit(Parus varius) in the Post Fledging Period by Using Radio-tracking. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 21(1) : 95-102. (in Korean with English summary)
  14. Kim, JK. SK Lee. HK Min and KC Oh. 2002. A Study on Food Resource and Utilization of Artificial Nest of Wild-birds in Urban Woodland, J. Environ. Ecol. 25(5) : 275-282
  15. Kim, J and TH Koo. 2003. Influence of theEco-park Development on Bird Community in Urban Stream. The Korean Journal of Ecology 26(3) : 97-102. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2003.26.3.097
  16. Konijnendijk, CC. RM Richard. A Kenney and TB Randrup. 2006. Defining urban forestry -a comparative perspective of North America and Europe. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 4(3-4) : 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2005.11.003
  17. Lee, KJ. BH Han and SD Lee. 2004. Ecological Management Plan and Biotope Structure of Namsan Urban Natural Park in Seoul. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 32(5) : 102-118. (in Korean with English summary)
  18. Lee, WS and SW Kim. 1996. Foods and Nest Boxes of Wildbirds in Natural and Degraded Ecosystems. Kor. J. Orni. 3(1) : 43-50. (in Korean with English summary)
  19. Lee, WS. TH Koo and JY Park. 2000. A FieldGuide to the Birds of Korea, Seoul : LG Evergreen Foundation. (in Korean)
  20. MacArthur, RH and EO Wilson. 1963. An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution 17 : 373-387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1963.tb03295.x
  21. MacArthur, RH. and J. MacArthur. 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42 : 594-598. https://doi.org/10.2307/1932254
  22. Magura, T. A Baldi and R Horvath. 2008. Breakdown of the species-area relationship in exotic but not in native forest patches. Acta Oecologica 33 : 272-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2007.11.007
  23. Naef-Daenzer, B and L Keller. 1999. The foraging performance of great and blue tits (Parus major and P. caeruleus) in relation to caterpillar development, and its consequences for nestling growth and fledging weight. Journal of Animal Ecology 68 : 708-718. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00318.x
  24. Naef-Daenzer, B and MU Gruebler. 2008. Post-fledging range use of Great tit Parus major families in relation to chick body condition. Ardea 96(2) : 181-190 https://doi.org/10.5253/078.096.0204
  25. Paxton, EH. 2008. Geographic variation and migratory connectivity of Willow Flycatcher subspecies: Flagstaff, Arizona, Northern Arizona University, Ph.D. dissertation.
  26. R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/
  27. Reichard, DG and ED Ketterson. 2012. Estimation of Female Home-range Size During the NestlingPeriod of Dark-eyed Juncos. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 124(3) : 614-620. https://doi.org/10.1676/11-189.1
  28. Rhim, SJ. SH Son. MJ Kim and JH Kang. 2008. Use of Artificial Nest Boxes of Tits in Coniferous and Deciduous Forests. Journal of Korean Forest Society 97(1) : 83-87. (in Korean with English summary)
  29. Riddington, R and AG Gosler. 1995. Differences in reproductive success and parental qualities between habitat in the Great tit Parus major. Ibis 137 : 371-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919x.1995.tb08035.x
  30. Sansei, G. E Padoa-Schioppa. L Lorusso. L Bottoni and R Lafortezza. 2009. Avian ecological diversity as an indicator of urban forest functionality. Results from two case studies in northern and southern Italy. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry 35(2) : 80-86.
  31. Shin, YU. MS Shin. HS Lee. YM Kang. WK Moon. HS Park and HS Oh. 2016. Study for Habitat Usage of Spot-billed Duck in Korea, Using GPS-Mobile Telemetry (WT-200). J. Environ. Ecol. 30(2) : 146-154. (in Korean with English summary)
  32. Song, WK. 2015. Analysis of Bird Species Diversity Response to Structural Conditions of Urban Park: Focused on 26 Urban Parks in Cheonan City. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 18(3) : 65-77. (in Korean with English summary)
  33. Song, WK. 2017. Analysis of Bird Diversity According to Landscape Connectivity and Structure of Urban Park. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 18(3) : 65-77. (in Korean with English summary)
  34. Song, WK. 2018. Analysis of Urban Green Areas using NDVI and Development of a Model to Analyze Bird Diversity in Urban Parks. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 21(1) : 73-82.
  35. Tremblay, I. D Thomas. MM Lambrechts. J Blondel and P Perret. 2003. Variation in Blue Tit breeding performance. Ecology 84 : 3033-3043. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0663

피인용 문헌

  1. 도시녹지 유형별 박새과 둥지 재료 특성 연구 vol.35, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.13047/kjee.2021.35.3.256