대한건축학회논문집:계획계 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design)

  • 제36권1호
  • /
  • Pages.105-111
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1226-9093(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-177X(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CPTED 사업으로 인한 근린의 물리적 환경변화가 빈곤지역 주민들의 범죄두려움과 동네만족도, 동네애착 형성에 미치는 영향 - 부산 사하구 감천2동을 대상으로 -

The Effects of Neighborhood Physical Changes caused by CPTED Project on Resident's Fear of Crime, Neighborhood Satisfaction, and Neighborhood Attachment in the Poverty Area - Focused on the Gamcheon 2-dong, Saha-gu, Busan -

  • 박주현 (공주대학교 도시.교통공학과) ;
  • 이경환 (공주대학교 건설환경공학부 도시.교통공학전공)
  • 투고 : 2019.08.01
  • 심사 : 2020.01.13
  • 발행 : 2020.01.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study was to empirically analyze the effects of physical environment change on the Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) project implemented in Gamcheon 2 Dong on the fear of crime, neighborhood satisfaction, and neighborhood attachment in the poor. In this study, the data collected through field surveys and questionnaires were analyzed using a structural equation model, specifically the SPSS AMOS 25 program. From the results of the analysis, it was found that the neighborhood satisfaction was enhanced by the improvement in the walking environment and the reduction in the neighborhood disorder level of the target area through the installation of major CPTED facilities. The results of the statistical analysis show that the reduction in the neighborhood disorder due to the CPTED project enhanced the neighborhood satisfaction and the level of neighborhood attachment in the local residents. In addition, the changes in the walking environment caused by the CPTED project had a positive effect on the neighborhood satisfaction, and as the degree of neighborhood disorder decreased, the neighborhood satisfaction increased and the local people's attachment level increased.

키워드

과제정보

이 연구는 형사정책연구원의 "국민안전 보장을 위한 형사정책의 실효성 제고 방안 연구(III) : 빈곤층 밀집지역의 안전실태와 개선방안 연구(2018)"의 조사자료를 일부 활용하여 작성함

참고문헌

  1. Moffat, R., M. (1983). Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design: A Management Perspective, Canadian Journal of Criminology, 25, 19-31. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjcrim.25.1.19
  2. Ha, S., & Kim, T. (2001). Socioeconomic Characteristics of Reoccupied - Residents in Housing Renewal Estate in Seoul, The Korean Regional Development Association, 13(3), 65-82.
  3. Kim, Y. (2007). Effect of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED)on the Fear of Crime, Korean Association of Public Safety and Criminal Justice Review, 16(4), 33-61.
  4. Shin, E., Park, K., Jung. Y., Kim, K., Park, H., & Hong, K. (2008). How to Institutionalize CPTED in Korea, Korean Institute of Criminology, 1-2.
  5. Kim, Y., & Han, S. (2008). An Empirical Analysis on the Broken Window Theory, The Korean Association For Public Administration, 229-252.
  6. Choi, H., & Choi, J. (2011). Applying an IPA(Importance-Performance Analysis) Model to Evaluate Elementary School Parents' Perceptions of Strategic Elements of CPTED for Protection of Children from Sexual Offences, The Journal of Police Science, 11(1), 87-130.
  7. Zainol, R., Ahmad, F., Nordin, N. A., & Aripin, A. W. M. (2014). Evaluation of users' satisfaction on pedestrian facilities using pair-wise comparison approach, In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 18(1), IOP Publishing.
  8. Ann, S. (2015). Relationship between Local Government's Social Security Network and Citizens' Fear of Crime and Quality of Life in Seoul, Master's Dissertation, Kyonggi University.
  9. Kim, H. (2017). A Study on CPTED Elements in Urban Regeneration Areas, Korean Police Studies Association, 16(2), 29-56.
  10. Kang, H., & Kim, H. (2018). Effects of Local Governments Social Security Network on Safety life satisfaction: Mediating effect of regional disorder, Korean Security Science Review, 77-99.
  11. Seo, S., Lee, W., Park, H., Chae, I., & Lee, K. (2018). The Time-series Analysis of the Effects of CPTED Project : A Case of Study of Wonseong-dong in Cheonan City, The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 37-62.
  12. Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows. Atlantic monthly, 249(3), 29-38.
  13. Jacobs, J. (1961). Death and Life of Great American Cities, New York: Random house.
  14. Newman, O. (1972). Defensible Space: Crime prevention through urban design, New York: Macmillan.
  15. Armstrong, G., & Giulianotti. R. (1998). From Another Angel: Police Surveillance and Football Supporters in C. Norris, J. Moran, and G. Armstrong (ed.): Surveillance, Closed Circuit Television and Social Control, Aldershot; Ashgate.
  16. Crowe, T. (2000). Crime prevention through environmental design: Applications of architectural design and space management concepts, Butterworth-Heineman.
  17. Ditton, J. (2002). Seasonality and fear of crime, London: Nuffield Foundation.
  18. Honess, T., & Charman, E. (2005). Closed Circuit Television in Public Place: Its Acceptability and Perceived Effectiveness, London: Home Office Police Department.
  19. Noe, H. (2005). Multivariate Analysis : Theory and Practice., Hyeongsuel.
  20. Kim, K. (2007). New Amos 16.0 Analysis of Structure Equation Model, Seoul:Hannarae.
  21. Cozens, P. (2008). Crime prevention through environmental design in R. Worterlry & L. Mazerolle (ed.), New York: Willan Publishing.
  22. Saville, G., & Cleveland, G. (2008). Second-Generation CPTED: The Rise and Fall of Opportunity Theory in Rondall I. Atlas (ed.), FL: CRC Press.