Journal of the Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회지)

Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Influences of Lecture Design Using CoRe upon Professor's Teaching Professionalism in College of Science-Engineering

CoRe를 활용한 수업 설계가 이공계열 교수의 수업 전문성에 미치는 영향

  • Song, Nayoon (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hong, Juyeon (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Noh, Taehee (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Han, JaeYoung (Department of Chemistry Education, Chungbuk National University)
  • Received : 2019.12.13
  • Accepted : 2020.01.19
  • Published : 2020.04.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, we analyzed the influences of lecture design using CoRe upon the professor's teaching professionalism in the aspects of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). The participants are three professors from the college of science-engineering located in Chungcheong-do. After collecting their syllabi, we observed their lecture and conducted the orientation. Afterward, we collected the CoRes which they prepared before the lecture. Then we observed their lecture and conducted semi-structured interviews. This process was carried out twice. We analyzed their syllabi, CoRes, videotaped lectures, field notes, the teaching materials, and interview transcripts. The results revealed that professors not only clarified the learning objectives and the characteristics of students but also reflected them in the lecture. In addition, they established the teaching strategies according to the characteristics of contents in the unit. As they recognized the necessity of understanding students' achievement, they selected the assessment method and applied it in the lecture. In some cases, however, they lacked presenting learning objectives specifically and explained students' misconceptions without inducing new concepts. They also presented a shortage of considering students' prior knowledge. They lacked providing students with an opportunity to participate in lectures, and their assessment method was not effective. Based on the results, we discussed implications to improve teaching professionalism using CoRe.

이 연구에서는 CoRe를 활용한 수업 설계가 이공계열 대학교수의 수업 전문성에 미치는 영향을 PCK의 측면에서 분석하였다. 충청도 소재의 대학교에 재직 중인 이공계열 교수 3명이 연구에 참여하였다. 강의 계획서를 수집하고 교수의 수업을 관찰한 후, 오리엔테이션을 진행하였다. 이후, 두 차례에 걸쳐 교수가 작성한 CoRe를 수집하고 이를 바탕으로 교수가 실행한 수업을 관찰하였으며, 반구조화된 면담을 실시하였다. 강의 계획서, 교수가 작성한 CoRe, 수업을 촬영한 영상, 관찰 노트, 수업 자료, 면담 전사본 등을 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 교수들은 학습목표와 학생의 특성을 명료화하고, 이를 수업에 반영하였다. 또한 단원 내용의 특성에 따른 교수전략을 수립하였으며, 학생의 이해 수준을 파악하는 것의 필요성을 인식함에 따라 평가 방법을 선정하고 이를 수업에서 활용하였다. 그러나 학습목표를 명시적으로 제시하는 것이 부족하였고, 학생의 오개념을 교수 중심으로 설명하는 것에 그쳐 새로운 개념을 유도하는 수업을 구성하는 것이 미흡하였다. 또한 학생의 사전 지식을 고려하거나 학생이 수업에 참여할 기회를 제공하는 것이 부족하였으며, 교수가 선정한 평가 방법이 효과적으로 이루어지지 않는 경우도 있었다. 이상의 결과를 바탕으로 CoRe를 활용한 교수의 수업 전문성 향상 방안을 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Yoon, C.-H. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 2017, 17, 245. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2017.17.16.245
  2. Lee, G.; Kwon, H.; Lee, J.; Lee, S. Journal of Engineering Education Research 2010, 13, 1.
  3. Jang, J.; Lee, H. Journal of Engineering Education Research 2016, 19, 3. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2016.19.4.3
  4. Bae, S.; Jeon, S.; Hong, J. The Journal of Yeolin Education 2017, 25, 149.
  5. Sinapuelas, M. L. S.; Stacy, A. M. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2015, 52, 790. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21215
  6. Chang, K. Korean Education Inquiry 2014, 32, 137.
  7. Song, N.; Hong, J.; Noh, T.; Han, J. Y. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2019, 39, 405. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2019.39.3.405
  8. Shin, Y.; Kim, D.; Hong, K. Journal of Engineering Education Research 2012, 15, 9.
  9. Fraser, S. P. Research in Science Education 2016, 46, 141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9459-1
  10. Min, H.; Yun, H. The Journal of Yeolin Education 2012, 20, 251.
  11. Lee, J.-K. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 2015, 15, 663.
  12. Shim, M.-J. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education 2012, 29, 371. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2012.29.1.371
  13. Loughran, J.; Berry, A.; Mulhall, P. Understanding and Developing Science Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge; Sense Publishers: Rotterdam, NL, 2006.
  14. Magnusson, S.; Krajcik, J.; Borko, H. In Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge; Gess-Newsome, J.; Lederman, N. G., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, NL, 1990; p 95.
  15. Van Driel, J. H.; Verloop, N.; De Vos, W. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1998, 35, 673. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<673::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-J
  16. Korthagen, F. A. J.; Kessels, J. P. A. M. Educational Researcher 1999, 28, 4. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028004004
  17. Loughran, J.; Mulhall, P.; Berry, A. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2004, 41, 370. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20007
  18. Hume, A.; Berry, A. Research in Science Education 2011, 41, 341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9168-3
  19. Loughran, J.; Mulhall, P.; Berry, A. International Journal of Science Education 2008, 30, 1301. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187009
  20. Williams, J.; Eames, C.; Hume, A.; Lockley, J. Research in Science & Technological Education 2012, 30, 327. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2012.740005
  21. Nilsson, P.; Karlsson, G. International Journal of Science Education 2019, 41, 419. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1551642
  22. Bertram, A.; Loughran, J. Research in Science Education 2012, 42, 1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9227-4
  23. Hong, S. Asian Journal of Education 2010, 11, 97. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2010.11.3.005
  24. Fernandez-Balboa, J.-M.; Stiehl, J. Teaching and Teacher Education 1995, 11, 293. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)00030-A
  25. Robert, J.; Carlsen, W. S. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2017, 54, 937. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21392
  26. Song, N.; Noh, T.; Han, J. Y. Journal of Engineering Education Research 2019, 22, 3. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2019.22.1.3
  27. Davidowitz, B.; Rollnick, M. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2011, 12, 355. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1RP90042K
  28. Padilla, K.; Ponce-de-Leon, A. M.; Rembado, F. M.; Garritz, A. International Journal of Science Education 2008, 30, 1389. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187033
  29. Schultz, M.; Lawrie, G. A.; Bailey, C. H.; Dargaville, B. L. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2018, 19, 508. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00251C
  30. Kil, Y. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education 2011, 28, 405. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2011.28.4.405
  31. Min, H.; Yoon, H. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 2017, 17, 307. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2017.17.11.307
  32. Kwon, S.; Shin, S. Y.; Kim, J. S. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 2011, 11, 51.
  33. Padilla, K.; Van Driel, J. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2011, 12, 367. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1RP90043A
  34. Strauss, A.; Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, U.S.A., 1998.
  35. Krathwohl, D. R. Theory Into Practice 2002, 41, 212. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
  36. Chan, C.; Burtis, J.; Bereiter, C. Cognition and Instruction 1997, 15, 1. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1501_1
  37. Carini, R. M.; Kuh, G. D.; Klein, S. P. Research in Higher Education 2006, 47, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
  38. Lee, Y. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies 2011, 23, 175. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2011.23.1.175
  39. Yorke, M. Higher Education 2003, 45, 477. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023967026413